Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Well, the Mac went back...  (Read 8883 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Dog6bravo

Offline Offline

Location: New Jersey
Member Since: Aug 2011
Posts: 13



« Reply #60 on: September 09, 2011, 05:36 AM »

Google Chrome is the browser you need to use with Citrix on Mac.  I could never use Citrix on my Mac, switched browser to Chrome and never had an issue with Citrix.
Logged
Julian Tracy

Offline Offline

Location: Redford, MI
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 426


WWW
« Reply #61 on: October 01, 2011, 11:58 AM »

Jeesh Bob - you might as well start selling Ryobi's!

Sounds like the folks that fault Festool's because their too complicated to use, metric, etc.  When we here know they're worth the xtra $$ and time spent figuring out how to use em.

Your $850 HP will be worth $35 in 8 months.  A $1000 iMac would be worth $650 a year later and $450 two years later.

Welcome to viruses and hassles.  Would have been worth the effort to get it ironed out...

They say that within 20 seconds of connecting to broadband, a new pc will be infected.  I've used Macs since 99 with no virus software with no issues.

Takes two hands to count the number of times per week I get spam emails from friends and acquaintances who's computers have been infected and are sending spam through their email accounts.  Takes another two hands to count the folks who complain about their computer's being slow or at the shop to be cleaned up and reset.

Why anyone would buy a PC I don't know...
Macs:
- no viruses
- high resale
- better hardware
- longevity of os/hardware compatibility
- better integration of os
- loaded with simple powerful apps
- better design, build
- did I say no viruses?

For you - compatibility with your warehousing network is key to your business, but for folks without those specific-type concerns, Macs are a better choice from any and all angles.

Julian
Logged
Alex

Offline Offline

Location: The Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 2800



« Reply #62 on: October 01, 2011, 12:17 PM »

Why anyone would buy a PC I don't know...

Luckily 92% of the market does know ....  Tongue Out
Logged
Julian Tracy

Offline Offline

Location: Redford, MI
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 426


WWW
« Reply #63 on: October 01, 2011, 12:42 PM »

That's like suggesting all those folks buying Craftsman tools at Sears or the new Porter Cable cordless stuff at Lowes know better than the folks here buying Festool products.

Can't have it both ways...

JT
Logged
Alex

Offline Offline

Location: The Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 2800



« Reply #64 on: October 01, 2011, 01:16 PM »

That's like suggesting all those folks buying Craftsman tools at Sears or the new Porter Cable cordless stuff at Lowes know better than the folks here buying Festool products.

 Huh?!

No, no, it's not like that at all.   Tongue Out

Btw, do you have any idea how incredibly smug you just sounded there?  Unsure
Logged
Julian Tracy

Offline Offline

Location: Redford, MI
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 426


WWW
« Reply #65 on: October 01, 2011, 01:54 PM »

Well, like most of the folks here, I'm quite sure of my opinions of quality and the value of spending a bit more to get it, along with the benefits that come from buying better tools (and computers, in this case).

I'll admit to being a tool snob as well.  If I have contractor's on a job using Ryobi or Craftsman tools, I do loose a bit of respect for them, or at least understand that they have no concept of quality tools; perhaps of quality work as well.

I have my limits as well though - not gonna spend $50 on a router bit or $400 for 38 driver and drill bits...

JT
Logged
GhostFist

Offline Offline

Location: Canada
Member Since: Oct 2010
Posts: 1068


« Reply #66 on: October 01, 2011, 02:40 PM »

the fact remains you spend more for less on mac. Less software compatibility, less upgrade options means all around less usability.
Logged
Dovetail65

Offline Offline

Location: UNITED STATES (US)
Member Since: Feb 2008
Posts: 3864



« Reply #67 on: October 01, 2011, 03:51 PM »

Losing respect for a contractor because of the tools they use is not tool snobbery, its insanity.

It is the final product and quality of work that counts, not the tools they use. A Ryobi does the EXACT same thing a Festool does, the tools do not make the work better, the user does. Around here a lot of guys keep their good stuff home and have a completely different set for the jobs. The tools they use has absolutely no bearing on the quality work they do. Many here admit they have loads of Festools and are horrible woodworkers and do it as a hobby.

Its like the plumbers I used. The guy that came in with the fancy truck and all the current stuff  and the clean and fancy tools did NOT pass the inspections. He laughed at the other sub that he called bucket plumbers. Well those bucket plumbers and their old rusty tools never failed an inspection and their work was always top of the line!

Not to mention some of these so called cheap tools outperform the Festools for less than 1/2 the money. I am not getting into it to much, but many here in the last day have said the new Ryobi drill is a fantastic tool! Compare the persons work, not their tools.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2011, 03:53 PM by Dovetail65 » Logged

The one who says it can't be done should avoid interrupting the person doing it.
jmbfestool

Online Online

Location: UK
Member Since: Jan 2009
Posts: 5194



« Reply #68 on: October 01, 2011, 03:52 PM »

Well, like most of the folks here, I'm quite sure of my opinions of quality and the value of spending a bit more to get it, along with the benefits that come from buying better tools (and computers, in this case).

I'll admit to being a tool snob as well.  If I have contractor's on a job using Ryobi or Craftsman tools, I do loose a bit of respect for them, or at least understand that they have no concept of quality tools; perhaps of quality work as well.

I have my limits as well though - not gonna spend $50 on a router bit or $400 for 38 driver and drill bits...

JT

Not gonna spend $50 on a router bit?  Well da aint alot? Da is £32  You can easily spend that on a cutter! Thats CHEAP for some cutters.   I have few ''cheap'' cutters which are £60 up   the more expensive ones are £100 up all for my OF2200.    £32 is for a decent cutter is  low.   My average cutter cost is properly £30-45 for good cutters

JMB
Logged

NEW UK members check out the new GB crew topic below

http://festoolownersgroup.com/member-connections/gb-crew/msg198248/#msg198248
Dovetail65

Offline Offline

Location: UNITED STATES (US)
Member Since: Feb 2008
Posts: 3864



« Reply #69 on: October 01, 2011, 03:55 PM »

Remember guys, we here in the states get a lot better pricing on tools. I guarantee some 25.00 USD cutters are as good or the same exact cutters you guys  pay almost double for. I consider us lucky over here.

Yes, good cutters are worth it, unless you ever hardly use them then throw a ways are fine. I find the lower quality cutters just don't last as long, but the first 100- 150 feet are just fine.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2011, 04:33 PM by Dovetail65 » Logged

The one who says it can't be done should avoid interrupting the person doing it.
fdengel

Offline Offline

Location: United States
Member Since: Jun 2010
Posts: 577


« Reply #70 on: October 01, 2011, 04:49 PM »

Why anyone would buy a PC I don't know...

Luckily 92% of the market does know ....  Tongue Out


Then why in the world do they still do it, if they already know better?
Logged
Brice Burrell

Offline Offline

Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Member Since: Mar 2007
Posts: 6195


Remodeling Contractor


WWW
« Reply #71 on: October 01, 2011, 05:07 PM »

Losing respect for a contractor because of the tools they use is not tool snobbery, its insanity.

It is the final product and quality of work that counts, not the tools they use.............


Well of course, it goes without saying, you know, you can't judge a book by it's cover.  But I assume Julian was speaking in generality and I agree with him, at least to some extent. 

As to PCs being overly problematic in regards to viruses, that's not been my experience.  I've never had a virus cause a problem that I needed to be concerned with.             
Logged

Check out my new blog, The Green and Dark Blue Blog.
Alex

Offline Offline

Location: The Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 2800



« Reply #72 on: October 01, 2011, 05:13 PM »

Why anyone would buy a PC I don't know...

Luckily 92% of the market does know ....  Tongue Out


Then why in the world do they still do it, if they already know better?


Do what exactly? What do they know better? You're a bit vague.
Logged
Alex

Offline Offline

Location: The Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 2800



« Reply #73 on: October 01, 2011, 05:17 PM »

I'm quite sure of my opinions of quality

You sure are.  Roll Eyes

I'll admit to being a tool snob as well.  If I have contractor's on a job using Ryobi or Craftsman tools, I do loose a bit of respect for them, or at least understand that they have no concept of quality tools; perhaps of quality work as well.

A good tool does not a good contractor make.  Wink

Logged
Julian Tracy

Offline Offline

Location: Redford, MI
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 426


WWW
« Reply #74 on: October 01, 2011, 05:32 PM »

Maybe not, but the fact remains that in many instances, good tools deliver better results; cleaner cuts, less slop, less chipping...

I've got a friend that could care less, but he uses a lot more caulk than I do...

Having said all that, in some cases, it's not worth the premium, or the results will be the same, but just take longer.  In other cases, such as as compressors and shop vacs, it's just rude to have the crappy stuff because of the increased noise they produce.

As for router bits, obviously I have a lot of $50-80 + bits, but I was referring to the basic 1/4", 1/2" shank edge cutters.  No need to spend Festool's cost of $38-58 a bit, when very good bits are available for much less.  The value proposition is much less.   Same with driver bits and drill bits.  Buy good ones, but no need to spend 300% more just cause they match your tools.

Those that dog macs usually have no actual experience with them.  Resale value alone makes the increased cost worth it by many times.

Four year old Mac laptop worth $500, two year old pc laptop = $25...  The lack of viruses does it for me.  And for those pc users that haven't had any virus isssues, I'd bet you've spent some time and money paying for and updating the Mcafee, etc. scanning software.

Another hidden cost of those scans is hugely increased startup times.  Most macs boot up in less than 30 seconds, some less.

Julian
Logged
Brice Burrell

Offline Offline

Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Member Since: Mar 2007
Posts: 6195


Remodeling Contractor


WWW
« Reply #75 on: October 01, 2011, 06:00 PM »


....The lack of viruses does it for me.  And for those pc users that haven't had any virus isssues, I'd bet you've spent some time and money paying for and updating the Mcafee, etc. scanning software.

Another hidden cost of those scans is hugely increased startup times.  Most macs boot up in less than 30 seconds, some less.

Julian

The current anti-virus software is very good and reasonably priced.  There is software that is pretty darn good for free.  The software I used was included for free for 24 months.  It does its thing without my spending any time dealing with it.  It will only bring a problem it can't deal with to my attention, but that hasn't happened yet and I doubt it will. 



....Those that dog macs usually have no actual experience with them.  Resale value alone makes the increased cost worth it by many times......



I never though of resale value because I've never thought of selling a computer.  I've never looked but I'd be surprised that a two old PC laptop only being worth $25 unless it was pretty beat up, I'm sure a beat Mac would be worth considerably less too.     
Logged

Check out my new blog, The Green and Dark Blue Blog.
Peter Halle
Global Moderator

Offline Offline

Location: Powhatan, Virginia USA
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 6382



WWW
« Reply #76 on: October 01, 2011, 06:35 PM »

I will unusually stay out of the Mac versus PC part of this, BUT, if you have a Mac, I would advise that you should be running antivirus software also.  It is possible to get a virus. I know first hand.  Remember, Macs are more popular now and it is a status symbol to write one.  Many cable providers will provide you with a free version.  It may be stripped down, but it sure is better than nothing.  I now run a FULL virus scan nightly.

Happy conversations!

Peter

Logged

The tools in my truck were talking the other day.  The Dewalts, PC's, Boschs, Makitas were not happy.  They also were in the minority.  Their complaint:  They felt unused and unappreciated since the Festools moved in.  I guess the truth hurts.
Alex

Offline Offline

Location: The Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 2800



« Reply #77 on: October 01, 2011, 07:56 PM »

I've been looking for a used laptop for my mother the last month and I only wished they came at 25% retail price. For a two year old laptop they certainly want at least 70% and 4-6 year olds go still for 50% minimum. No idea why you would want a 4 year old piece of hardware anyway, with the rate modern hardware develops, it's severely outdated already. You can also be sure that a 4 year old laptop comes with a dead battery so you can add a new one to the cost also, if you're lucky enough to find one.

As for virusses, their relevance is greatly exaggerated by some. Like me, most people never have a problem with them. I own and build my own pc's now for 15 years and I've only had two or three major problems with virusses in that time. Problems which were easily resolved in a day's time, by the way. I have my virus scanner and my firewall turned off all the time, because their restricting measures bother me a lot more than any virus does. And I'm one of those guys who downloads, installs and experiments with about any program or utility I can get my hands on. I just run my virus scanner manually once in a while and it hardly finds anything but tracking coockies.   

Anyway, my view is, if you like one system or the other, Mac or PC, fine, but respect people with different opinions.
Logged
RL

Online Online

Location: Canada
Member Since: Feb 2010
Posts: 2115



« Reply #78 on: October 01, 2011, 08:42 PM »

This is one of those arguments that will never be settled. But my 2c is this.

My three-year old macbook laptop works as fast and as well as it did on day one, and I have no need to replace it for the foreseeable future.

Never had a virus or a problem in all that time, and I must have replaced my laptops every two years prior to buying a macbook.

So draw whatever conclusions you like, but in my experience, I'll can't see myself buying a pc again unless things radically change.

Oh, and my laptop battery still lasts for nearly three hours after being fully charged, which is amazing.
Logged

I like green.
GhostFist

Offline Offline

Location: Canada
Member Since: Oct 2010
Posts: 1068


« Reply #79 on: October 01, 2011, 09:28 PM »

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/240603/new_mac_trojan_pretends_to_be_flash.html
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2011/09/mac-trojan-poses-as-pdf-to-open-botnet-backdoor.ars
Logged
joraft

Offline Offline

Location: SoCal (San Fernando Valley)
Member Since: Feb 2008
Posts: 699



« Reply #80 on: October 02, 2011, 09:19 AM »


... As to PCs being overly problematic in regards to viruses, that's not been my experience.  I've never had a virus cause a problem that I needed to be concerned with.             


I've had the same experience as you, Brice, I've been using MS based computers since the eighties and they have served me well.

I have nothing against Apple based computers, or the people who choose to use them, they're just machines after all. But what I do find annoying is that so many Apple users seem to have such an attitude of superiority. They're not satisfied with just using and enjoying their machines, they for some reason feel compelled to frequently tell the world how much smarter they are than those who are using and enjoying a different choice.
Logged

John
Brice Burrell

Offline Offline

Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Member Since: Mar 2007
Posts: 6195


Remodeling Contractor


WWW
« Reply #81 on: October 02, 2011, 12:50 PM »

....I have nothing against Apple based computers, or the people who choose to use them, they're just machines after all. But what I do find annoying is that so many Apple users seem to have such an attitude of superiority. They're not satisfied with just using and enjoying their machines, they for some reason feel compelled to frequently tell the world how much smarter they are than those who are using and enjoying a different choice.

John, I don't mind at all because secretly I know I'm the smarter one.  With the thousands I've saved buying PC's over the years I've bought a ton more Festools. Tongue Out
Logged

Check out my new blog, The Green and Dark Blue Blog.
Tim Raleigh

Offline Offline

Location: Oakville Canada
Member Since: Jan 2010
Posts: 1668



WWW
« Reply #82 on: October 02, 2011, 01:55 PM »


I've had the same experience as you, Brice, I've been using MS based computers since the eighties and they have served me well.

I have nothing against Apple based computers, or the people who choose to use them, they're just machines after all. But what I do find annoying is that so many Apple users seem to have such an attitude of superiority. They're not satisfied with just using and enjoying their machines, they for some reason feel compelled to frequently tell the world how much smarter they are than those who are using and enjoying a different choice.


Same here...I won't add any other comments or examples other than this clip from "The life of Brian" "... it's symbolic of his struggle against reality" Hilarious!
Monty Python - Life of Brian - PFJ Union meeting

http://youtu.be/hUBAx8jbYNs
Logged
Dovetail65

Offline Offline

Location: UNITED STATES (US)
Member Since: Feb 2008
Posts: 3864



« Reply #83 on: October 02, 2011, 01:59 PM »

The main reason there are barely any viruses for mac(there are some)is that it is not worth a hacker time to create the virus. That's a fact. Why would anyone try to exploit a few million users when they could mess with a billion+ PC machines. Google it, the mac is just as easy to get into and make viruses for. It's simply a numbers game and is not worth anyone's time when there are so many PC's to infiltrate.

When any mac user can come close to the performance of my machine (and 3 d graphics as well!) at 1/2 the cost get back to me. I will put up my home made machine against the best macs on the market and my machine is 12 months old!
« Last Edit: October 02, 2011, 02:02 PM by Dovetail65 » Logged

The one who says it can't be done should avoid interrupting the person doing it.
jmbfestool

Online Online

Location: UK
Member Since: Jan 2009
Posts: 5194



« Reply #84 on: October 02, 2011, 02:13 PM »

The main reason there are barely any viruses for mac(there are some)is that it is not worth a hacker time to create the virus. That's a fact. Why would anyone try to exploit a few million users when they could mess with a billion+ PC machines. Google it, the mac is just as easy to get into and make viruses for. It's simply a numbers game and is not worth anyone's time when there are so many PC's to infiltrate.

When any mac user can come close to the performance of my machine (and 3 d graphics as well!) at 1/2 the cost get back to me. I will put up my home made machine against the best macs on the market and my machine is 12 months old!

And all that power just for FOG.   Tongue Out Tongue Out
Logged

NEW UK members check out the new GB crew topic below

http://festoolownersgroup.com/member-connections/gb-crew/msg198248/#msg198248
fidelfs

Offline Offline

Location: Houston, TX
Member Since: Mar 2007
Posts: 372


Houston, TX


« Reply #85 on: October 02, 2011, 03:34 PM »

Well,

Joraft, it is both ways.  I work with high technologiy companies, with the gratest and latest tools.  This is how It is my work every day.

Most of the companies are using pc windows for the clients, (users like you and me).  They have big servers, using windows, Unix, linix what not.

Most of the companies IT decides what the users will use as tools and computers.  It has been traditionally pc and windows.

I was strugling early 2000 with some requirements, because at that time, it was a big thing with the companies, moving into the web.  Most of the tools to have graphics were on mac or very expensive windows versions, that require a very advance graphic card and processor for their graphics.

I decide to buy my first mac.  I discover that it was not much difference that windows, but some tasks were simplier and easier than windows base OS.  I kept using my mac and linix at home, and windows at work.
People say that apple users are snow, but my experience is windows user always try to tell me how dumb I am for drinking the apple cool aid.  How I am wasting my monyey, etc.  See, it is the other side of the coin.

Nowdays the big IT Departments are opening up and letting users pick their tools, so I am seing more diversity on the workplace, linux laptops and apple laptops.

It is not that 92% know better, I would say 92% of that 92% dont know what they are  buying.  They just buy for impulse, or seing some bechmarks published by a magazine paid by the manufacturer to print the info.

So, if it works for you be happy, if you want test the waters in the other side it is not that bad ( either side)
Logged

There is never a situation where it can't be done with the right hand tool - even though it may be a lot more work.
Dovetail65

Offline Offline

Location: UNITED STATES (US)
Member Since: Feb 2008
Posts: 3864



« Reply #86 on: October 02, 2011, 03:48 PM »

The main reason there are barely any viruses for mac(there are some)is that it is not worth a hacker time to create the virus. That's a fact. Why would anyone try to exploit a few million users when they could mess with a billion+ PC machines. Google it, the mac is just as easy to get into and make viruses for. It's simply a numbers game and is not worth anyone's time when there are so many PC's to infiltrate.

When any mac user can come close to the performance of my machine (and 3 d graphics as well!) at 1/2 the cost get back to me. I will put up my home made machine against the best macs on the market and my machine is 12 months old!

And all that power just for FOG.   Tongue Out Tongue Out

hehe, well that, cad ,cam and mostly for my kids games.
Logged

The one who says it can't be done should avoid interrupting the person doing it.
Alex

Offline Offline

Location: The Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 2800



« Reply #87 on: October 02, 2011, 05:27 PM »


It is not that 92% know better, I would say 92% of that 92% dont know what they are  buying.  They just buy for impulse, or seing some bechmarks published by a magazine paid by the manufacturer to print the info.


Well, wadda ya know, another smug remark by a Mac fanboy.   Thumbs Up You guys just can't help yourselves, can you?  Scratching Chin Thanks for once again proving the point Joraft made.  Roll Eyes

Tsk, tsk.

Logged
fdengel

Offline Offline

Location: United States
Member Since: Jun 2010
Posts: 577


« Reply #88 on: October 02, 2011, 06:34 PM »

the fact remains you spend more for less on mac. Less software compatibility, less upgrade options means all around less usability.

Less hassle, less time wasted on troubleshooting, less worrying, fewer viruses, fewer problems...
Logged
fidelfs

Offline Offline

Location: Houston, TX
Member Since: Mar 2007
Posts: 372


Houston, TX


« Reply #89 on: October 02, 2011, 07:50 PM »


It is not that 92% know better, I would say 92% of that 92% dont know what they are  buying.  They just buy for impulse, or seing some bechmarks published by a magazine paid by the manufacturer to print the info.


Well, wadda ya know, another smug remark by a Mac fanboy.   Thumbs Up You guys just can't help yourselves, can you?  Scratching Chin Thanks for once again proving the point Joraft made.  Roll Eyes

Tsk, tsk.



Alex, if you want to put it out of context to prove your point is ok, but that it is not what I said.
Logged

There is never a situation where it can't be done with the right hand tool - even though it may be a lot more work.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: