NEW2FES
Offline
Location: USA Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 25
|
 |
« on: June 08, 2012, 12:00 PM » |
|
Ok, finally ordered my first Festool and sorry to say not 100% impressed/ I lurked around here so I knew the miter fence was questionable but for the money was expecting more. Yes it can be set for accuracy but the repeatability is not there without fiddling or checking. I need more set and cut accuracy as others also have posted so on to the first addition. I have an Osbourne t track miter gauge for a table saw and figured why not router a t track slot and use the Osbourne gauge. It is free and would hopefully eliminate all the flex and non repeatability of the Festool one. Anybody ever mount a miter fence like this?  Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Festool USA does not pre-approve the contents of this website nor endorse the application or use of any Festool product in any way other than in the manner described in the Festool Instruction Manual. To reduce the risk of serious injury and/or damage to your Festool product, always read, understand and follow all warnings and instructions in your Festool product's Instruction Manual. Although Festool strives for accuracy in the website material, the website may contain inaccuracies. Festool makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness or timeliness of the material on this website or about the results to be obtained from using the website. Festool and its affiliates cannot be responsible for improper postings or your reliance on the website's material. Your use of any material contained on this website is entirely at your own risk. The content contained on this site is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.
|
|
Kevin Stricker
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Feb 2009
Posts: 437
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2012, 05:28 PM » |
|
Check out qwas dogs. There is another user who also makes dogs to attach rails, forgetting his name right now.
Just realize that the fence is only half of the equation leading to possible inaccuracies. I find the more important variable to control is your plunge and cut as the rail also has some play.
Maybe I am just lazy, but when I want dead accurate I use my table saw. For cabinet building the MFT is plenty accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ScotF
Offline
Location: Southern Orange County, CA, USA Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 1357
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2012, 12:48 AM » |
|
I find that with the MFT/3 properly set up that it is very accurate and repeatable. It did take some adjusting and there are a lot of things to tighten down. At Festool training class they walked through an order of how to set things up and adjust and since I have followed that method everything has checked out fine for me...now I only square things if I take the protractor off and put it back on...otherwise, it stays adjusted. You can look at the process on Festool TV on YouTube or a call to Festool Service and they can walk you through the adjustments.
Scot
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
b_m_hart
Offline
Location: SF, CA Member Since: May 2008
Posts: 345
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2012, 02:29 AM » |
|
I realize that it will feel a bit like a "gotcha", but buying at least a pair of the qwas dogs will enable you to square your table up easily. The MFT top is CNC bored to pretty much a dead perfect grid - you can use the qwas dogs to calibrate the rail and the fence to be square. It takes me all of two minutes (tops) to go from having the fence and and guide rail detached to setup and perfectly square.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
TS 55 EQ, ETS 150/5, RO 150 FEQ, OF 1010 EQ, DF 500 Q, C12, CT Midi, OF 2200 EB, MFT/3s, DTS 400 EQ, parallel guides, and seemingly growing by the day...
|
|
|
Peter Parfitt
Magazine/Blog Author
Offline
Location: England Member Since: Apr 2011
Posts: 964
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2012, 02:37 AM » |
|
I have no problems at all with the accuracy (squareness) of my MFT 3 - it is a great piece of kit and an essential tool if you do work away from base. It would be a good idea to get it set up properly in the first place so get some 20mm dogs (from Qwas in North America or Intelligent Workshop in Europe) and follow the routine in either Paul Marcel's video or my video review of the dogs in the 'Other Tool Review' section here on the FOG.
Yes, there is a new dog design on the way which will improve accuracy, repeatability and ease of travel. It will be a couple of weeks more before they are annouced.
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Kapex 120, OF 2200, OF1400, TS55, TS55R, CMS-TS55R, PSC420, Domino 500, MFT3, Rotex 90, Rotex 150, CTL26, 1400 & 2700 Guide Rails and a lovely watch Wish List: C15, HL850, BS75, DF700, Second Extractor, new secretary
|
|
|
NEW2FES
Offline
Location: USA Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 25
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2012, 07:28 PM » |
|
I have the Qwas and the problem isn't setting it up it is the flex and movement of all the fixtures. I am always lost when someone says their's works perfect when in design it would be impossible??
If you set the miter gauge up to perfection then lift, remove a piece of wood, set in a new one, you will show a difference. I know it is wood and everybody's idea of accuracy is different. Simply set the gauge then grab the opposite end of the bar and you can flex it about 10 degrees. If you put pressure of the short end you can also move it.
The miter assy attaches with pressure from a clamp that has rubber on it that also causes flex and inaccuracy.
The idea to use a t track miter gauge is they are adjustable to keep movement to a min. You have a hardened steel bar moving within a aluminum track that has adjustability to remove any slop. Once that is set the assy itself has again almost no deflection.
I just do not understand why at this price point the miter gauge isn't more "SET AND GO" without constant checking. There is no argument here it is just fact. I like think if more were honest instead of cheerleading there would be a better product. I am sorry but if I just picked this up at Hardor for $250 I would say fine but this is a $600 folding table without accys that work properly and accurate.
I like this site and don't want anybody to get the wrong idea, I call it as I see it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Michael Kellough
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 1905
Southern New York
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2012, 12:32 AM » |
|
I have the Qwas and the problem isn't setting it up it is the flex and movement of all the fixtures. I am always lost when someone says their's works perfect when in design it would be impossible??
If you set the miter gauge up to perfection then lift, remove a piece of wood, set in a new one, you will show a difference. I know it is wood and everybody's idea of accuracy is different. Simply set the gauge then grab the opposite end of the bar and you can flex it about 10 degrees. If you put pressure of the short end you can also move it.
The miter assy attaches with pressure from a clamp that has rubber on it that also causes flex and inaccuracy.
The idea to use a t track miter gauge is they are adjustable to keep movement to a min. You have a hardened steel bar moving within a aluminum track that has adjustability to remove any slop. Once that is set the assy itself has again almost no deflection.
I just do not understand why at this price point the miter gauge isn't more "SET AND GO" without constant checking. There is no argument here it is just fact. I like think if more were honest instead of cheerleading there would be a better product. I am sorry but if I just picked this up at Hardor for $250 I would say fine but this is a $600 folding table without accys that work properly and accurate.
I like this site and don't want anybody to get the wrong idea, I call it as I see it.
You're right, as a miter gauge it doesn't compare to an Incra etc. Just think of it as a pivot point with some ballpark angle positions that you have to dial in for your purpose. Once you have the angle set you should clamp the fence down if you plan to make more than one cut.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Parfitt
Magazine/Blog Author
Offline
Location: England Member Since: Apr 2011
Posts: 964
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2012, 01:42 AM » |
|
The 'Parf Dogs' will go a long way to solving this problem. The prototype sets will be made very soon.
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Kapex 120, OF 2200, OF1400, TS55, TS55R, CMS-TS55R, PSC420, Domino 500, MFT3, Rotex 90, Rotex 150, CTL26, 1400 & 2700 Guide Rails and a lovely watch Wish List: C15, HL850, BS75, DF700, Second Extractor, new secretary
|
|
|
b_m_hart
Offline
Location: SF, CA Member Since: May 2008
Posts: 345
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2012, 02:26 AM » |
|
I have the Qwas and the problem isn't setting it up it is the flex and movement of all the fixtures. I am always lost when someone says their's works perfect when in design it would be impossible??
If you set the miter gauge up to perfection then lift, remove a piece of wood, set in a new one, you will show a difference. I know it is wood and everybody's idea of accuracy is different. Simply set the gauge then grab the opposite end of the bar and you can flex it about 10 degrees. If you put pressure of the short end you can also move it.
The miter assy attaches with pressure from a clamp that has rubber on it that also causes flex and inaccuracy.
The idea to use a t track miter gauge is they are adjustable to keep movement to a min. You have a hardened steel bar moving within a aluminum track that has adjustability to remove any slop. Once that is set the assy itself has again almost no deflection.
I just do not understand why at this price point the miter gauge isn't more "SET AND GO" without constant checking. There is no argument here it is just fact. I like think if more were honest instead of cheerleading there would be a better product. I am sorry but if I just picked this up at Hardor for $250 I would say fine but this is a $600 folding table without accys that work properly and accurate.
I like this site and don't want anybody to get the wrong idea, I call it as I see it.
Nothing wrong with you saying that at all. I am curious to know what you're doing with your MFT that you are pushing hard enough on whatever it is that you're cutting that you'd set the fence off by that much. Also, if there IS that much flex, why not simply put a clamped stopper behind it as mentioned? I agree with you that it is an expensive piece of gear, but you also have to bear in mind that it was designed to be portable - and to make it rock solid would mean that it would be too heavy to be practical to move. So, you get a table that will give you very accurate references, you just need to take the extra step of securing them to the point where it's solid enough for whatever you're doing. As a functional example, I've cut shims of varying widths on each end to true up the subfloor of my house. I had to cut well over 500 of them, and rarely more than 2 or 3 at a time were the exact same dimensions in a given batch. I used dogs to attach a rail to two tables, and a 2x4 that I had planed down to give me a straight reference point. I slid that under the rail and butted it up against the dogs. From there, I had shims that I had cut, and would insert them as needed. Now, I could shove on the 2x4s that I'd trim down as hard as I wanted to, and nothing was going to budge ever. Here are some pictures, hopefully it'll help a bit. As far as the fence goes, it's the same idea - just have to secure it to meet your needs.  That's one of the spacers  That's the table setup  That's one of the "better" transitions between sheets of ply in terms of elevation changes  And that was the subfloor before a bit of sanding to do some smoothing here and there. Flat, level, and solid - three things it certainly was NOT before I started. There was no way I would have been able to do that in any reasonable period of time without the tables and (qwas) dogs. Finally...  That's the hallway and one of the bedrooms having the first coat of poly applied. Every room on that floor needed the subfloors corrected, with some areas having a drop of more than 2 inches over 8 feet. Anyway, long-winded and rambling way of getting to the point I suppose, but it is what it is. Ripping down 2x4s in random lengths to glue and nail under ply or on their own onto old wavy subfloor was not a gentle task, and there was a lot of slamming of pieces to ensure that they were firmly in place before cutting. Yes, there were some mistakes, but they were all due to failures relative to things such as simple math.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
TS 55 EQ, ETS 150/5, RO 150 FEQ, OF 1010 EQ, DF 500 Q, C12, CT Midi, OF 2200 EB, MFT/3s, DTS 400 EQ, parallel guides, and seemingly growing by the day...
|
|
|
Frank-Jan
Offline
Location: Belgium Member Since: Sep 2007
Posts: 726
Dutch Canadian living in Belgium
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2012, 02:38 AM » |
|
From the amount of flex you say your fence has, I'm fairly certain you didn't install the black thingy to secure the other end of the fence. You can see it near the end of this video (it is installed at about 5 min into the video)
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 18, 2012, 03:27 PM by Frank-Jan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kayaker145
Offline
Location: United States Member Since: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2012, 11:29 PM » |
|
I also just purchased the track saw and am having the slope issue. I have it dialed in perfectly square, however when I change the angle I am roughly a half of a degree off. A real pain when cutting picture frames. Also I am having an issue with a "D" shape when cutting the stock. Not sure why this is occurring. Does anyone have any ideas? Oh and the fence does have some slope to it. If i use the lock down at the end of the fence that too is throwing me off from time to time either pushing or pulling the fence back. Any ideas on this as well?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ScotF
Offline
Location: Southern Orange County, CA, USA Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 1357
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2012, 01:15 AM » |
|
I also just purchased the track saw and am having the slope issue. I have it dialed in perfectly square, however when I change the angle I am roughly a half of a degree off. A real pain when cutting picture frames. Also I am having an issue with a "D" shape when cutting the stock. Not sure why this is occurring. Does anyone have any ideas? Oh and the fence does have some slope to it. If i use the lock down at the end of the fence that too is throwing me off from time to time either pushing or pulling the fence back. Any ideas on this as well?
As far as the stop on the end of the fence, I think that the key is to tighten to the fence first and then to the table profile at square. If you do it the other way around you can throw things off when you tighten to the fence as it will pull or push the fence in or out -- the fence will flex and the rail on the MFT is stronger where the clamp is tightened. Scot
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NEW2FES
Offline
Location: USA Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 25
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2012, 02:56 PM » |
|
This is a $600 table it should not need anything to work properly. I like the bench otherwise but it just is annoying to have to make excuses for it. I am well aware of the outward clamp and yes it will lock it in place but is awkward at best. The design of the miter gauge needs work. There are just too many clamping points that cause the flex and misalignment.
The internet is a very powerful forum. I bet Festools sales have gone up 75% from internet use as the Brands name has been wide spread as people always seek what is supposedly the best. I am the kind that does not mind spending the money as long as the item works, end of story. I do not want to build this or that or I would have just built myself a table.
By saying something works and knowing it is an issue just hurts everyone as the Co will not make changes and it creates dissatisfied buyers like myself. They can develop a miter gauge that works out of the box especially at this price point. Festools are great tools but I did not buy them to look at them and polish them. It should work and I hope someone sees this and redesigns it so it works better in the future.
I will correct to my liking but again shouldn't of had to at that price point. $600 for a folding table.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sancho57
Offline
Location: So Cal USA Member Since: Jan 2011
Posts: 1073
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2012, 06:28 PM » |
|
I at one time was extremely frustrated and upset with my festools and the MFT in particular. I couldnt get the darn thing square for the life of me. I watched the videos, talked to the tech support on the phone I was pizzzed
Until went to a end user class, went through the set up with the instructor. My issue was a I didnt have a known good square for squaring up the guide ail and fence. When I realized what was happening, It was a ephinany the light came down fro heaven and I heard the angels sing.
I can now set my MFT and square everything up faster then I can roll out my table saw, plug it in and plug in and attach my dust collector.
I suggest going to your brick and mortar festool dealer if he cant help you, get the number of the tech rep and meet him and he will learn ya everything you need to know.
Festools are a different way of doing things you have to change your mind set to the "festool way of doing thing" If that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shhhhhh Dont tell the wife butttttt I bought another…….
|
|
|
deBeaupre
Offline
Location: Canada Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: January 25, 2013, 04:12 PM » |
|
This is a $600 table it should not need anything to work properly. I like the bench otherwise but it just is annoying to have to make excuses for it. I am well aware of the outward clamp and yes it will lock it in place but is awkward at best. The design of the miter gauge needs work. There are just too many clamping points that cause the flex and misalignment.
The internet is a very powerful forum. I bet Festools sales have gone up 75% from internet use as the Brands name has been wide spread as people always seek what is supposedly the best. I am the kind that does not mind spending the money as long as the item works, end of story. I do not want to build this or that or I would have just built myself a table.
By saying something works and knowing it is an issue just hurts everyone as the Co will not make changes and it creates dissatisfied buyers like myself. They can develop a miter gauge that works out of the box especially at this price point. Festools are great tools but I did not buy them to look at them and polish them. It should work and I hope someone sees this and redesigns it so it works better in the future.
I will correct to my liking but again shouldn't of had to at that price point. $600 for a folding table.
Amen, I feel the exact same way about my mft/3.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fastbike
Offline
Location: North Texas, USA Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 92
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: January 25, 2013, 04:35 PM » |
|
Then it would be time to use the return policy. This is a $600 table it should not need anything to work properly. I like the bench otherwise but it just is annoying to have to make excuses for it. I am well aware of the outward clamp and yes it will lock it in place but is awkward at best. The design of the miter gauge needs work. There are just too many clamping points that cause the flex and misalignment.
The internet is a very powerful forum. I bet Festools sales have gone up 75% from internet use as the Brands name has been wide spread as people always seek what is supposedly the best. I am the kind that does not mind spending the money as long as the item works, end of story. I do not want to build this or that or I would have just built myself a table.
By saying something works and knowing it is an issue just hurts everyone as the Co will not make changes and it creates dissatisfied buyers like myself. They can develop a miter gauge that works out of the box especially at this price point. Festools are great tools but I did not buy them to look at them and polish them. It should work and I hope someone sees this and redesigns it so it works better in the future.
I will correct to my liking but again shouldn't of had to at that price point. $600 for a folding table.
Amen, I feel the exact same way about my mft/3.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.
|
|
|
tjbnwi
Offline
Location: Northwest Indiana Member Since: May 2008
Posts: 708
Cedar Tucky Indiana
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2013, 10:18 AM » |
|
In reply number 12 the statement was made "it should not need anything extra". The "fence rail clamp" (black thingy) is not an extra, it should have been in the MFT package. It is there to secure the free end of the fence. The fence is over 3' long, the primary connecting point is close to the guide rail. That gives you a lever of about 2'. The engineers knew this could be a problem and supplied the fence rail clamp. Would you use a table saw fence without both ends being clamped to the saw rails?  Think about that flex. The first thing you should do with the fence rail clamp is take it apart (don't loose the spring). Relocate the upper clamp section to the hole that moves the knob farther from the rail. Set the rail, slide the fence rail clamp in position, as previously mentioned, snug the clamp to the rail with the knob, now snug the clamp to the table with the lever. Neither have to be tightened, just snugged. The above will eliminate any flex in the rail. Both "ends" are now secure to the table. Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
waho6o9
Offline
Location: San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles California Member Since: Dec 2009
Posts: 471
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2013, 12:05 PM » |
|
No sense in being frustrated, just call Festool tech support. They'll dial it in for you and address your concerns.
Personally, I use rail dogs and qwas dogs as it's quicker for me. Sometimes I attach the blue Rockler t track rails to make multiple cuts.
I like the idea of using a t track and Osborne miter gauge as well. Maybe make a "V" and put the t track on it, that way you can use the width and length of the MFT3. The V will fit in the extruded aluminum on the outside of the MFT3.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sancho57
Offline
Location: So Cal USA Member Since: Jan 2011
Posts: 1073
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2013, 10:31 PM » |
|
I bought the quas dogs and they do make it easier to get a true 90 between the fence and guide rail. I use them to put the fence exactly 90' from the guide rail they square the guide rail to the fence. Its dead nuts
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shhhhhh Dont tell the wife butttttt I bought another…….
|
|
|
foxvalley63
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: February 02, 2013, 01:50 PM » |
|
I have to agree with NEW2FES. The MFT3 fence system has way to much flex in it. It drove me crazy trying to make square cuts on it. After months of messing around with it, got mad and drilled through the fence and bolted it down. Well that warped the fence. Ended up pitching the fence and making one out of a old delta sliding table fence. Cuts are dead on now and can have table much closer to wall. As for table being portable, really?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Parfitt
Magazine/Blog Author
Offline
Location: England Member Since: Apr 2011
Posts: 964
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2013, 02:09 PM » |
|
I have to agree with NEW2FES. The MFT3 fence system has way to much flex in it. It drove me crazy trying to make square cuts on it. After months of messing around with it, got mad and drilled through the fence and bolted it down. Well that warped the fence. Ended up pitching the fence and making one out of a old delta sliding table fence. Cuts are dead on now and can have table much closer to wall. As for table being portable, really?
I took a leaf out of Paul Marcel's book and got an extra fence clamp. It is an excellent addition if you are using rear fence and guide rail. Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Kapex 120, OF 2200, OF1400, TS55, TS55R, CMS-TS55R, PSC420, Domino 500, MFT3, Rotex 90, Rotex 150, CTL26, 1400 & 2700 Guide Rails and a lovely watch Wish List: C15, HL850, BS75, DF700, Second Extractor, new secretary
|
|
|
foxvalley63
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: February 02, 2013, 02:20 PM » |
|
I tried the back fence setup with the "black thingy" attached to the rear rail, the plastic hook didn't hold so I jammed a shim in it. That worked but the fence from the protractor to the right still flexed. Thats why I drilled it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonathan-m
Online
Location: Belgium Member Since: Apr 2012
Posts: 137
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: February 02, 2013, 02:54 PM » |
|
I'll join team unhappy with my MFT/3. Some of my personal findings:
To be clear, the MFT/3 does work. It can be set to precision (and I constantly have to). The problem is the precision is lost after a few operations and you constantly have to fiddle with the fence/miter gauge to keep it from going out of square. I'm sorry having to be blunt and say that after everything I've tried, even on a second MFT/3, I simply cannot believe anyone who says their MFT/3 is perfect and does not exibit problems.
MFT issues summary: - It's not stable. (Cross braces help a lot, but really these should come with the standard package shouldn't they) - The miter guage is sloppy. - The fence doesn't stay put.
When you place your miter gauge as close to the guide rail as possible and apply just a little pressure to the part of the fence that slides under the rail, you'll see it flexes back by 2mm.
I've tried PaulMarcel's setup of attaching the fence with 2 rail fixing clamps. But only using 2 of these clamps and not the miter gauge I can't fix the fence in place no matter how hard I bolt it down. The fence totally moves out of square after a couple of sheets have been butted against it. It can't be locked down hard enough to stay in place with this method.
Now before everyone comes arguing, my unit is not faulty. I've tried all this on a second MFT/3. I've also been searching for months, and keep doing so, for Youtube videos on the MFT/3. I've tried just about anything under the rainbow except for permanently fixing it to the table.
This sadly makes me conclude the fence & sloppy miter gauge design is flawed and could definitely be improved.
As to the portability. Technically it is portable. You just have to be a pretty strong guy to move it from a van, through a house and up some stairs with ease. I have a love/hate realtionship with the MFT/3. It's a good concept and when I have it dialled in it performs lovely. I'm just annoyed to no end I have to keep re-setting it after 20 cuts.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 02, 2013, 03:11 PM by jonathan-m »
|
Logged
|
Green: MFT/3, MFT/3-QT, OF-1400, MFS-400, MFS-700, MFS-FS, RO-90, SYS-ROLL, VAC-SYS SET SE1, VAC SYS AD MFT/3 Orange: VCP 260 LE AC Red: MT55cc, P1cc
|
|
|
Tim Raleigh
Offline
Location: Oakville Canada Member Since: Jan 2010
Posts: 1671
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: February 02, 2013, 04:28 PM » |
|
When you place your miter gauge as close to the guide rail as possible and apply just a little pressure to the part of the fence that slides under the rail, you'll see it flexes back by 2mm.
I've tried PaulMarcel's setup of attaching the fence with 2 rail fixing clamps. But only using 2 of these clamps and not the miter gauge I can't fix the fence in place no matter how hard I bolt it down. The fence totally moves out of square after a couple of sheets have been butted against it. It can't be locked down hard enough to stay in place with this method.
Line up the straight edge to a row of holes and before you tighten it to the miter gauge put some Qwas dogs behind them. You will find the slight tension the miter gauge puts on the straight edge holds it from flexing when you put stock against it. Tim
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonathan-m
Online
Location: Belgium Member Since: Apr 2012
Posts: 137
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: February 02, 2013, 11:20 PM » |
|
Tim, that isn't the problem. Like I said, I can set the MFT/3 up to be as good as perfectly square. The problem I'm trying to describe is that when you butt up a thin piece of wood to the fence, It can flex out of alignment by about 2mm at the point of cut. So that's 2mm over the distance of about 20cm of fence...
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 03, 2013, 02:13 PM by jonathan-m »
|
Logged
|
Green: MFT/3, MFT/3-QT, OF-1400, MFS-400, MFS-700, MFS-FS, RO-90, SYS-ROLL, VAC-SYS SET SE1, VAC SYS AD MFT/3 Orange: VCP 260 LE AC Red: MT55cc, P1cc
|
|
|
Tim Raleigh
Offline
Location: Oakville Canada Member Since: Jan 2010
Posts: 1671
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: February 03, 2013, 02:11 PM » |
|
I will take a photo and post later, got some cleaning to do. If I understand you correctly when you say fence you are referring to the thinner aluminum extrusion held in place by the miter gauge and end clamp not the rail? I leave the dogs in on either side of the miter gauge after I tighten it. I put one at the end of the fence and put one close to the cutting edge. It is so close to the cutting edge it is covered by the rail. I don't get any flex in the fence.
If you are referring to the rail, yes there is a bit of play which someone here (I can't remember who) has come up with a solution for.
Tim
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
GhostFist
Offline
Location: Canada Member Since: Oct 2010
Posts: 1072
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: February 03, 2013, 06:12 PM » |
|
I have to say, reading on the FOG has swayed me from purchasing an MFT/3. Most reviews are positive but common themes show up such has adjustments and extra jigs necessary for accurate and repeatable cuts. I might as well build my own. See Guido
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Guilliaume woodworks
Offline
Location: orange county,calif. Member Since: Nov 2012
Posts: 187
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: February 04, 2013, 01:34 AM » |
|
I like mft. But I only use mine for 90 degree crosscuts . I've anchored fence to table, I've installed the SlopStop on guide rail & use qwas dogs every chance I get. I also treat it gently & periodically check for accuracy. In the process of building larger & longer version of mft. Will post pics when finished. Not gonna be portable though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Parfitt
Magazine/Blog Author
Offline
Location: England Member Since: Apr 2011
Posts: 964
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: February 04, 2013, 04:41 AM » |
|
I like mft. But I only use mine for 90 degree crosscuts . I've anchored fence to table, I've installed the SlopStop on guide rail & use qwas dogs every chance I get. I also treat it gently & periodically check for accuracy. In the process of building larger & longer version of mft. Will post pics when finished. Not gonna be portable though.
I think Guilliaume is right and Ghostfist should not be so worried. A lot of the discussion in this thread, and many other MFT threads, is about superb accuracy. The MFT3 will deliver good accuracy and certainly enough for the mobile fitter. On the odd occasion when supreme accuracy is required then I do a final check with a square just before the cut. The use of either Rail Dogs or Parf Dogs may help a bit but at the end of the day it is about good workshop (or on site) practices - knowing the limitations and mitigating them when required. I have been using my MFT3 a lot lately for jig work, mainly in support of Domino work, and it just cannot be beaten. I can do offset face-frame Domino joints in next to no time thanks to the versatile clamping support concept of the MFT3. Check out this link:
Sawing is important but it is only one part of the MFT story. Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Kapex 120, OF 2200, OF1400, TS55, TS55R, CMS-TS55R, PSC420, Domino 500, MFT3, Rotex 90, Rotex 150, CTL26, 1400 & 2700 Guide Rails and a lovely watch Wish List: C15, HL850, BS75, DF700, Second Extractor, new secretary
|
|
|
fastbike
Offline
Location: North Texas, USA Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 92
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: February 04, 2013, 11:27 AM » |
|
You're not understanding the advice. Put some dogs behind the fence, butt the fence to the dogs, tighten the head. Leave the dogs in place. No flex. Tim, that isn't the problem. Like I said, I can set the MFT/3 up to be as good as perfectly square. The problem I'm trying to describe is that when you butt up a thin piece of wood to the fence, It can flex out of alignment by about 2mm at the point of cut. So that's 2mm over the distance of about 20cm of fence...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.
|
|
|
|