Author Topic: No CT wings for me, I guess  (Read 20007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
No CT wings for me, I guess
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:48 PM »
I was a bit surprised to see the new Festool CT wings.

I think we can all make something better, with the use of our festools of course.

You need some scrap materials and 10 minutes.

If I need one that I haven't got, I make one.

I wonder what different designs we can come up with if we shared our plans and uses.

Here's a few pictures and a video for inspiration.























 
« Last Edit: October 01, 2014, 06:15 PM by bror »

Festool USA does not pre-approve the contents of this website nor endorse the application or use of any Festool product in any way other than in the manner described in the Festool Instruction Manual. To reduce the risk of serious injury and/or damage to your Festool product, always read, understand and follow all warnings and instructions in your Festool product's Instruction Manual. Although Festool strives for accuracy in the website material, the website may contain inaccuracies. Festool makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness or timeliness of the material on this website or about the results to be obtained from using the website. Festool and its affiliates cannot be responsible for improper postings or your reliance on the website's material. Your use of any material contained on this website is entirely at your own risk. The content contained on this site is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.


Offline Deansocial

  • Posts: 2114
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2014, 03:56 PM »
Whats the white seal

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2014, 04:01 PM »
the white seal is just standard foamy tape. I think it's called weatherstripping in English.


Offline Alex

  • Posts: 5474
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2014, 04:20 PM »
Amazing it can hold 25 kilogram. Never realised that much power can come out of the vac. Clever idea Bror, with some scraps you can make endless variations for all kinds of purposes. I'll keep this in mind.

Offline Kev

  • Posts: 7647
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2014, 04:33 PM »
Well done! [wink]

Did you experiment with different surface areas?

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2014, 04:46 PM »
Thanks. Yes I did. The rougher the surface the thicker foam you need. But thicker tape will allow more vertical movement.
So the thinnest tape possible without air-leakage is probably the best.

The bigger the surface the more power. With full vacuum you can lift something like 10.000 kilo's per square meter, I think. That would be 1 kilo per square centimeter in case of full vacuum (- 1 atm). I don't know what % vacuum a CT26 can reach. I guess something like 10 or 20 %. maybe some Fogger knows.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2014, 06:17 PM by bror »

Offline roblg3

  • Posts: 751
  • Transforming into a whole new machine
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2014, 05:16 PM »
 [thumbs up]  GREAT JOB!  Sometimes I'm so lazy [not worthy]
Rob Gardner
Operator
RL3 Enterprises

Offline Peter Halle

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 10868
  • Let's Redux / Revive / Rewind / Rollback the FOG!
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2014, 05:50 PM »
I too wouldn't have thought about that much suction.  One thing I might suggest based on using vacuum pump "pucks" would be to apply a hard finish to all sides before applying the weatherstripping tape so that air bleed thru the "puck" is minimized.

Peter
Disclaimer:  I have been involved with the development of some TSO Products.  I have offered thoughts and ideas freely.  I am not paid but I may receive products during the development process or afterwards.

Offline GOT8SPD

  • Posts: 228
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2014, 05:50 PM »
That thing really sucks

Offline Peter Parfitt

  • Magazine/Blog Author
  • *
  • Posts: 3739
    • New Brit Workshop on YouTube
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #10 on: September 14, 2014, 06:42 AM »
Years ago, long before I bought my CT26, I tried to make a vacuum clamp to hold small flat pieces for router edge work. My vacuum let me down and I gave up on the idea.

After playing with the CT Wings I had another go at my idea but this time using the CT26. It is not as elegant as the device made by Bror but it works. The black rubber stuff is that non slip matting used for bench top router work.

Peter

The basic box with some 15 mm holes and ability to be clamped to the bench:


The magic matting:


Holding a piece of ply:

Offline RKA

  • Posts: 916
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #11 on: September 14, 2014, 07:43 AM »
Huh! I never would have thunk to try this...learn something new every day!  Thanks gents!   [thumbs up]
-Raj

Offline Ollie

  • Posts: 45
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #12 on: September 14, 2014, 11:14 AM »
Brilliant.

I will definitely make some of these.

Ollie

Offline TelcoRandy

  • Posts: 230
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #13 on: September 14, 2014, 12:07 PM »

Offline rst

  • Posts: 1551
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #14 on: September 14, 2014, 12:39 PM »
Vacuum jigs are simple to make...use closed cell weatherstripping.  I have various jigs for making acrylic parts.  I make the pattern from 3/8" acrylic.  When I occasionally damage the acrylic pattern, it is easy to repair by using acrylic cement of even modeling glue to soften chips and glue back into the damaged area and sand.  If you are machining thin pieces just glue spacers with bits of the weatherstripping from pulling the material down beyond level.

Offline jmbfestool

  • Posts: 6568
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #15 on: September 14, 2014, 05:09 PM »
I seen a vacuum hold up a car on TV once ->
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/none-of-the-above/videos/super-suction/

That's one of the worst links I have clicked on FOG.    You don't get to see it lifting the car.  Just stupid question at the end how many vacs or fail.


Jmb
*********************************************************************** [thumbs up]UK members click me
*********************************************************************** [thumbs up]

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #16 on: September 15, 2014, 03:02 PM »
Peter Parfitt, Nice idea. I think I'll have a go on making my own vacuum holder too. Has anyone made a similar jig?

Rogier
« Last Edit: September 15, 2014, 04:21 PM by bror »

Offline waho6o9

  • Posts: 1288
    • Garage Door Handyman.com
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #17 on: September 15, 2014, 03:11 PM »
Amazing

Offline Peter Parfitt

  • Magazine/Blog Author
  • *
  • Posts: 3739
    • New Brit Workshop on YouTube
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #18 on: September 15, 2014, 03:14 PM »
Peter Parfitt, Nice idea. I think I'll have a go on making my own vacuum holder too. Has any one made a similar jig?

Rogier

Not that I am aware of.

Peter

Offline Roseland

  • Posts: 530
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #19 on: September 15, 2014, 04:03 PM »
One of the best threads I've come across.  Fabulous food for thought.  Thanks to bror and Peter for the photos.  I see a range of applications...

Andrew
TS55, MFT/3, OF1400, OF1010, CT26, RS100, ETS125, CXS, MFS400, DF-500, Zobos.

Offline andyman

  • Posts: 629
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #20 on: September 15, 2014, 04:18 PM »
 [thumbs up]

Offline overanalyze

  • Posts: 409
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #21 on: September 15, 2014, 07:55 PM »
Great solutions!

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2014, 03:38 PM »
I had a few hours spare time in the workshop this afternoon and took up my vacuum project.

Managed to make a few prototypes.

For who is interested here's some pic's and a few video's. Sorry for the filming quality, I only have two hands.

Peter Parfitt: here is my version of the vacuum-bench-holder.

It is a box that holds itself to the bench and holds a workpeace.





there is an adaptor for smaller peaces





It really sucks





You can easily change the pattern of the weathering strip when you use coated ply for concrete







tried to film it:

 

It took a lot of force to move the peace of ply:




Next part of the project was a vacuum rail holder







At first I wanted it to clamp the rail to the work peace, then I realized it would be better if it was able to slide in line. that could come in handy if you haven't brought a long rail.

 

Again a sort of filming:






That's all for now, thanks for watching

Rogier


« Last Edit: September 17, 2014, 04:33 AM by bror »

Offline Peter Parfitt

  • Magazine/Blog Author
  • *
  • Posts: 3739
    • New Brit Workshop on YouTube
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2014, 03:50 PM »
Hi Rogier

I say again - I think that your designs are far better than mine - well done. The idea of having the work piece clamp hold itself to the bench is so simple but so brilliant.

One addition that you might like to think about...In order to hold a guide rail in place why not use the channel on the underside. You would need to stop it off with a rubber plug (not sure of the cross section of the channel but about 10 cm long in order for it not to get sucked inwards) and a short strip of rubber at either end of the work piece that goes between the rubber strips under the rail.

By the way; You can damage an extractor if you do not allow some bleeding. I am sure that the CT Wings design takes this into account but I am not sure that Rogier's designs do.

Peter

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2014, 03:58 PM »
Hi Peter,

Good point, the necessary air bleed, I am afraid that my hose automatically provides that.

And it is always possible to drill a small hole somewhere in the vacuum clamp.

And thank you for the compliment!

Rogier
« Last Edit: September 20, 2014, 01:27 PM by bror »

Offline ART at WORK

  • Posts: 199
  • Buy less Recycle more
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2014, 06:20 PM »
Wow what great ideas you have come up with Rogier. You are an insparation to me. So simple and good looking, love the fact the wall units fit in a systainer. Thinking in the system. Could you make one of your great systainer tops in to a vac clamp as well. [smile]
Thanks for inspiring and sharing.
Pip
Kapex 120 + UG Set, ETS 150/3, DF 500, RO 90, MFT/3, CTL 36 AC, RO 150, 0F 900, OF 2200, T15+3,  CDD 12, TS 55, A5 Router table, First Aid kit, LR 32 SYS, FS 800, FS 1400/2, FS 1400/2 LR32 FS2 3000, CTL Midi + Cleaning Set, Clamps, Parallel Guides, Centrotec drills, Zobo Forstner set and countersinks, Routers, Systainers, Sortainers, Sys Cart, Syslite

Offline overanalyze

  • Posts: 409
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2014, 09:36 PM »
That is awesome! A homemade vac clamp!! Brilliant. Thanks for sharing.

Online Dongar

  • Posts: 77
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #27 on: September 16, 2014, 10:00 PM »
I believe that the CT's have bypass motors that have a separate fan for cooling and therefore will not over heat from blocked flow like cheaper vacuums that use the same fan for cooling and vacuum.
 Don

Offline NERemodeling

  • Posts: 608
    • New England Remodeling, LLC
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #28 on: September 16, 2014, 11:48 PM »
Great ideas!!    Thanks for sharing

John
CT26  -  (2) Midi  - Planex - Kapex -  Domino 500  -  Carvex  -  TS55EQ -  Rails; 800, 1080, 1400(holy rail), 1900, 3000 -  OF1400 - OF1010  - LR 32 - RO 150 - RO90 - RAS115 - ETS125 - DTS400 - LS130 -  EHL65 - HL850 -  MFT1080 - (2) MFT800

Offline bossie

  • Posts: 4
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2014, 09:23 AM »
@bror, really smart stuff. Somebody posted a link on woodworking.nl. I hope it is royalty free  [wink]


Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2014, 04:17 PM »
Hi Rogier

I say again - I think that your designs are far better than mine - well done. The idea of having the work piece clamp hold itself to the bench is so simple but so brilliant.

One addition that you might like to think about...In order to hold a guide rail in place why not use the channel on the underside. You would need to stop it off with a rubber plug (not sure of the cross section of the channel but about 10 cm long in order for it not to get sucked inwards) and a short strip of rubber at either end of the work piece that goes between the rubber strips under the rail.

By the way; You can damage an extractor if you do not allow some bleeding. I am sure that the CT Wings design takes this into account but I am not sure that Rogier's designs do.

Peter

Peter, adapting the rail like that, wouldn't that look an awful lot like the mafell aerofix? A nice product, but I'm looking for a vacuum rail-holder that I could use whenever I needed one. On any length of rail. Shouldn't get in the way when I don't need it. And be cheap.
Furthermore I wanted it to be able to slide forward without getting off track.

Rogier
« Last Edit: September 22, 2014, 04:34 PM by bror »

Festool USA does not pre-approve the contents of this website nor endorse the application or use of any Festool product in any way other than in the manner described in the Festool Instruction Manual. To reduce the risk of serious injury and/or damage to your Festool product, always read, understand and follow all warnings and instructions in your Festool product's Instruction Manual. Although Festool strives for accuracy in the website material, the website may contain inaccuracies. Festool makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness or timeliness of the material on this website or about the results to be obtained from using the website. Festool and its affiliates cannot be responsible for improper postings or your reliance on the website's material. Your use of any material contained on this website is entirely at your own risk. The content contained on this site is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.


Offline Peter Parfitt

  • Magazine/Blog Author
  • *
  • Posts: 3739
    • New Brit Workshop on YouTube
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #31 on: September 23, 2014, 12:19 AM »
Hi Rogier

I am not familiar with the Mafell aerofix but just watched a video about it. Yes, that is the sort of idea that I had in mind except I would want to use the standard Festool track rather than a special one. The Festool guide rail has the rubber underneath which should act as a seal to the left and right of the rail. All that is then needed are seals under the rail at each end of the workpiece. This could be just a couple of small pieces of that non slip matting that you can see in the middle photo of my rubbish design somewhere up above.

Peter

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #32 on: October 01, 2014, 05:42 PM »
Thanks, Slartibartfass, Alex, Kev, roblg3, Peters, GOT8SPD, RKA, Ollie, waho6o9, Roseland, andyman, overanalyze, Pip, Dongar, NERemodeling and bossie.

I've used the vacuum lifting jig four times in the last weeks, lifting tiles, opening a concrete lid and removing floors. It worked OK. Even with a fair amount of air-bleeding.

I've even used the bench-vacuum-jig a few times, I don't call my old Festool vacuum a spare any more.

I guess there must be a lot more possible uses.

Has any one got a (brilliant) idea for this new use of the dust extractor?

I'm all for sharing inspiration.

@bossie, thanks for the link alert.

@Peter Halle, take care and all the best to you

Rogier
« Last Edit: October 01, 2014, 06:14 PM by bror »

Offline #Tee

  • Posts: 783
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #33 on: October 02, 2014, 04:39 AM »
i was gonna buy 4 ct wings but after this thread im goona cancel that order and make my own lol
When youre feeling depressed just treat yourself to a systainer even if its a mini systainer its ok.

IG: tee212

Offline wow

  • Inactive Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3579
  • Official WalMart greeter to the FOG
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #34 on: October 02, 2014, 05:35 AM »
I believe that the CT's have bypass motors that have a separate fan for cooling and therefore will not over heat from blocked flow like cheaper vacuums that use the same fan for cooling and vacuum.
 Don

I don't believe this is true? EKAT only shows one motor/turbine that I can see? And I really can't tell if it has an external fan attached to that motor for cooling?

If I am wrong about the bypass motor I'm sure someone will be quick to correct me. Whether I am wrong or right, I don't want misinformation to cause someone to damage their CT. It's wise to be careful to not wreck your CT if you intend to use the vac clamp for extended periods. A small bypass gap ought to do the trick?
Trying to be one of the most helpful members on the FOG.

Offline Peter Parfitt

  • Magazine/Blog Author
  • *
  • Posts: 3739
    • New Brit Workshop on YouTube
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #35 on: October 02, 2014, 06:27 AM »
I believe that the CT's have bypass motors that have a separate fan for cooling and therefore will not over heat from blocked flow like cheaper vacuums that use the same fan for cooling and vacuum.
 Don

I don't believe this is true? EKAT only shows one motor/turbine that I can see? And I really can't tell if it has an external fan attached to that motor for cooling?

If I am wrong about the bypass motor I'm sure someone will be quick to correct me. Whether I am wrong or right, I don't want misinformation to cause someone to damage their CT. It's wise to be careful to not wreck your CT if you intend to use the vac clamp for extended periods. A small bypass gap ought to do the trick?

I am sure that getting as much suction power out of the CT to lift blocks and so on is going to risk a burn out unless bleed valves are built in. Now which FOGger has the knowledge to work out just how much 'bleeding' will be needed in order to be able to protect an extractor? Will those calculations work for every extractor in the range?

I think that Rogier's ideas are brilliant but they are not for the faint hearted.

Peter

Offline wow

  • Inactive Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3579
  • Official WalMart greeter to the FOG
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #36 on: October 02, 2014, 08:21 AM »
I believe that the CT's have bypass motors that have a separate fan for cooling and therefore will not over heat from blocked flow like cheaper vacuums that use the same fan for cooling and vacuum.
 Don

I don't believe this is true? EKAT only shows one motor/turbine that I can see? And I really can't tell if it has an external fan attached to that motor for cooling?

If I am wrong about the bypass motor I'm sure someone will be quick to correct me. Whether I am wrong or right, I don't want misinformation to cause someone to damage their CT. It's wise to be careful to not wreck your CT if you intend to use the vac clamp for extended periods. A small bypass gap ought to do the trick?

I am sure that getting as much suction power out of the CT to lift blocks and so on is going to risk a burn out unless bleed valves are built in. Now which FOGger has the knowledge to work out just how much 'bleeding' will be needed in order to be able to protect an extractor? Will those calculations work for every extractor in the range?

I think that Rogier's ideas are brilliant but they are not for the faint hearted.

Peter

I would think that looking at the CT wings would be a good place to start. Whatever they use for a bleed opening there ought to be a clue, shouldn't it?
Trying to be one of the most helpful members on the FOG.

Offline Peter Parfitt

  • Magazine/Blog Author
  • *
  • Posts: 3739
    • New Brit Workshop on YouTube
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #37 on: October 02, 2014, 09:35 AM »
Hi Wow,

The more I think of this the more I think that a home made CT based vacuum clamp is too great a risk. I am already one of the naughty ones who uses a Dust Deputy (risk of static discharge destroying the CT) but I think, after seeing the information above, that I will give up any ideas of such a clamp.

I hope that Festool HQ are aware of the great design ideas that Rogier has demonstrated and feed this into their design team.

Peter

Offline pugilato

  • Posts: 579
  • Pugilato is not really my name... Andy
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #38 on: October 02, 2014, 02:46 PM »
Hmmm... it occurs to me that with these truly nice helpers, you would need to dedicate the vac to the helper, and need another for the machine unless you're going to do some handwork. I wonder if it works with wet-dry vacs.

Offline wow

  • Inactive Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3579
  • Official WalMart greeter to the FOG
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #39 on: October 02, 2014, 03:29 PM »
Hmmm... it occurs to me that with these truly nice helpers, you would need to dedicate the vac to the helper, and need another for the machine unless you're going to do some handwork. I wonder if it works with wet-dry vacs.

I don't see any reason why it shouldn't? In this case, I think a vacuum is a vacuum. It's simply the suction that the machine produces that we're after. The Festool DE's might well produce more vacuum than a shop vac - I don't know. But as long as the vacuum produced is adequate to the task, I would think it would be fine.

And it would be a lot cheaper to learn a lesson with a shop vac than with a DE...if such a thing were to occur.
Trying to be one of the most helpful members on the FOG.

Offline Peter Parfitt

  • Magazine/Blog Author
  • *
  • Posts: 3739
    • New Brit Workshop on YouTube
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #40 on: October 02, 2014, 03:41 PM »
I have a Numatic NDD 900 which has a safety circuit that first warns when the motor is working too hard and then shuts the machine down. Not many extractors will have that sort of protection and so I would not risk it.

Peter

Offline rst

  • Posts: 1551
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #41 on: October 02, 2014, 03:59 PM »
i make pattern routed plastics parts, hundreds at at time.  I used a cheap Sears shop vac and the intake on make air compressor for years, sometimes 6-8 hours a day with self made jigs...never burnt one up.  I finally got serious and bought a surplus vac pump.  These are smooth parts so there is serious suction, It may be that for job site use more volume may be needed for leakage.

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #42 on: October 02, 2014, 04:14 PM »
Maybe Peter Halle can shed a little light on this,



from: http://festoolownersgroup.com/festool-tool-reviews/gary-katz-reviews-the-ct-wings/

He appears to know some one who knows all about it.

His statement got me thinking in the first place, btw thanks for that Peter.

Don't know about the construction of the CT 26 and family, but I replaced the motor of my old Festo SR151-AS once. (wasn't it originally a WAP?) It had a seperate fan on the back of the motor for cooling.



But still; you can hear the rpm of the motor rise if you block the inlet completely. I wonder what effects that might have.

I usually let the vacuum-jigs bleed air with the aid of the Festool vacuum air bleeding valve:



In this case the valve was closed (for 12 seconds only), but later on it became clear that this was not necessary at all.

To get lifting power you need maximum surface, thats's more important than suction power.

All you have to do is lower the air pressure inside the jig, than the atmospheric pressure provides the force.

When using vacuum jigs I open the bleeding valve as much as possible for the purpose at hand. It is amazing how little suction you need when the surface is big enough.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2014, 04:35 PM by bror »

Offline roblg3

  • Posts: 751
  • Transforming into a whole new machine
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #43 on: October 02, 2014, 04:19 PM »
festool ct's have built in thermal protection.  is that what we're talking about here?
Rob Gardner
Operator
RL3 Enterprises

Offline amt

  • Posts: 362
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #44 on: October 02, 2014, 04:37 PM »
There may be some rare cases where blocking the flow can cause problems with overheating the bearings, and not the motor, but I doubt it's likely to happen for this stuff.

Offline Tom Bellemare

  • Inactive Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5148
  • Festool demo's & personal service in Central Texas
    • Tool Home LLC
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #45 on: October 02, 2014, 04:46 PM »
I'm not certain it's analogous but perhaps it's the air impeller equivalent of a router dwelling. If the router bit isn't really cutting, the motor isn't really working. The router motor works hardest when the bit is cutting the most.

By the same token, if an impeller isn't moving any air, it isn't really working, it is dwelling. It seems to me that it would work less and draw less current, (which I'm pretty certain it does). If it had a separate fan for bypass cooling, it would remain happily spinning with only the cooling fan's load.


Tom


EDIT:
It's always a bad idea to let a router bit dwell because it overheats. I don't think the same is true of a CT with a separate cooling fan.
Tom Bellemare
Customer Svc
Tool Home LLC
www.tool-home.com
512-428-9140

Offline amt

  • Posts: 362
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #46 on: October 02, 2014, 05:20 PM »
There's some info here regarding my message about the bearings. http://www.centralvacuummotor.com/shopbot.htm
The motors referenced there do have separate cooling for the motors.  However, they all have 3 stage fans, and probably produce a lot more heat than the standard 1 or 2 stage vacuum motor

Offline downtheroad

  • Posts: 126
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #47 on: October 04, 2014, 06:28 PM »
Tehdoor just posted his version on YouTube today.

Tony

Offline jimbouk

  • Posts: 338
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #48 on: October 05, 2014, 04:04 AM »
Thats awesome!
BHC 18, TSC 55REB, OF 1400, MIDI, TS55, TRION, Df500, CSX...

Offline wow

  • Inactive Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3579
  • Official WalMart greeter to the FOG
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #49 on: October 05, 2014, 05:32 AM »
Anybody know which laser that is that he's using?
Trying to be one of the most helpful members on the FOG.

Offline bror

  • Posts: 70
    • diafer.nl
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #50 on: November 01, 2014, 03:45 PM »
I guess the discussion about the possible dangers of restricting or blocking the air flow when using a Festool vacuum has moved to this thread:

http://festoolownersgroup.com/festool-tools-accessories/can-ct-vacs-safely-run-under-blocked-suction/msg349293/?topicseen#msg349293

It would be nice to hear an official Festool opinion on the matter though.

Rogier

Offline Bob D.

  • Posts: 660
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #51 on: June 04, 2017, 09:50 AM »
Since it is negative pressure (or vacuum) that does the work and not volume of air moved, why wouldn't a HVAC vacuum pump work? They are made to be dead-headed and pull a higher vacuum than a shop vac or dust extractor is meant to.

There are vacuum attachments that you can use with your air compressor that use the venturi affect to draw a vacuum as well. These can be used for vacuum clamping, vacuum chucks for lathes,  and other applications.

-----
It's a table saw, do you know where your fingers are?

Offline ben_r_

  • Posts: 791
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #52 on: June 04, 2017, 11:26 AM »
Wow, resurrected and old thread here. Good one though, still cool!
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!

Offline rst

  • Posts: 1551
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #53 on: June 04, 2017, 04:24 PM »
I've been using a surplus HVAC pump for more than 20 years...$15.00 from a local surplus shop.  I've used it with self made jogs, Virutex clamping jigs and now with the two Festool stations.  These things are virtually indestructible.264096-0264098-1264100-2

Offline ben_r_

  • Posts: 791
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #54 on: June 05, 2017, 01:03 PM »
I've been using a surplus HVAC pump for more than 20 years...$15.00 from a local surplus shop.  I've used it with self made jogs, Virutex clamping jigs and now with the two Festool stations.  These things are virtually indestructible. (Attachment Link) (Attachment Link) (Attachment Link)
Wow! Thank you for mentioning that! Those look awesome (LINK) and much cheaper than the Festool option! Looks like Lee Valley even sells the hold down plate: LINK


Any other brands to check out for similar products? Any suggestions for a new pump? How about a way to add a foot switch?
« Last Edit: June 05, 2017, 01:13 PM by ben_r_ »
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!

Offline Bob D.

  • Posts: 660
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #55 on: June 05, 2017, 04:37 PM »
From their website 80 PSI gives you ~12 PSI vacuum or ~24 Inches of mercury which is pretty good. What you'll be able to pull on any given day depends on the quality of the vacuum pump and the atmospheric pressure where you are, but 24" should be achievable on any day and possibly better with a bit more pressure than 80PSI from your compressor.

Vacuum pumps require maintenance. The oil has to be changed and there are other considerations depending on the model, so it's not as easy as it might seem at first glance. But if you already have a pump hanging around or want to convert a pump to work in your shop there are a bunch of YT videos showing how to do just that.
-----
It's a table saw, do you know where your fingers are?

Offline rst

  • Posts: 1551
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #56 on: June 05, 2017, 05:52 PM »
I've been using my pump for 20+ years and never did anything except refill the oil jar.  I've noticed that most of the newer ones are oil-less...not sure if that makes a difference.  There are pumps in all sorts of price ranges on Amazon, I've actually been considering another to use with the Virutex clamps which I held onto for use at home.

Offline Peter Halle

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 10868
  • Let's Redux / Revive / Rewind / Rollback the FOG!
Re: No CT wings for me, I guess
« Reply #57 on: June 05, 2017, 07:49 PM »
A source is joewoodworker,com or veneer supplies.com. 

If you are interested in vacuum clamping basics I have some unedited videos up on youtube that I did years ago.  Search there for Peter Halle.  (note:  this isn't click bait.  I don't monetize my site.)

Peter
Disclaimer:  I have been involved with the development of some TSO Products.  I have offered thoughts and ideas freely.  I am not paid but I may receive products during the development process or afterwards.