Author Topic: Ct 26 efficiency  (Read 2239 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pilotboat

  • Posts: 7
Ct 26 efficiency
« on: January 09, 2017, 12:40 PM »
I have a CT-26 for my Festools.  I purchased a dust deputy kit that fits on top of the CT 26.  I am wondering how much  performance (if any) does the dust kit cause.  Anyone have an opinion?

Festool USA does not pre-approve the contents of this website nor endorse the application or use of any Festool product in any way other than in the manner described in the Festool Instruction Manual. To reduce the risk of serious injury and/or damage to your Festool product, always read, understand and follow all warnings and instructions in your Festool product's Instruction Manual. Although Festool strives for accuracy in the website material, the website may contain inaccuracies. Festool makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness or timeliness of the material on this website or about the results to be obtained from using the website. Festool and its affiliates cannot be responsible for improper postings or your reliance on the website's material. Your use of any material contained on this website is entirely at your own risk. The content contained on this site is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.

Offline Holmz

  • Posts: 3268
Re: Ct 26 efficiency
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2017, 01:05 PM »
Please not any "opinions"... One could measure the Lessing of flow with something like a kestrel anemometer. And I believe that some measurement have been made.

Basically a DD pulling out the majority start off worse, but gets to be the same as the bag gets full.
I ain't no mathematician but i have some negative and positive screwdrivers
I ain't no pilot but i have some planes.
I ain't no sucker but i have a vacuum.
And I has me some saws, and some sandpapers.

Offline demographic

  • Posts: 261
Re: Ct 26 efficiency
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2017, 01:24 PM »
Can't remember who it was but someone on here has tested it (Peter Parfit maybe? and the loss of suction, although measurable was pretty much insignificant.

Offline Dovetail65

  • Posts: 4396
    • Rose Farm Floor Medallions and Inlays
Re: Ct 26 efficiency
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2017, 01:35 PM »
I used to have the nice metal units years ago, sold them here actually.

My memory of those combined with how I use my units units now(the bags get packed so tight with dust they are like a brick) I would say there is no noticeable loss in real world use when using them. A loss might be measurable on some kind of meter, but that's it.
The one who says it can't be done should avoid interrupting the person doing it.

Offline rst

  • Posts: 1273
Re: Ct 26 efficiency
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2017, 01:42 PM »
I have two of the steel Oneidas and an Ultimate, there is no noticeable loss and not having to empty bags is great.  My two steel units sit on 25 gallon paint/grease drums and I can go months without filling.  Best yet, the vac filters look unused.

Offline copcarcollector

  • Posts: 1260
Re: Ct 26 efficiency
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2017, 01:57 PM »

Offline kasezilla

  • Posts: 10
Re: Ct 26 efficiency
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2017, 10:04 AM »
I agree. I recently purchase the Ultimate and found it to have almost no difference in efficiency. The ability to suck up anything and know I am not going to paying to replace bags make the CT26 all the more useful. It also fits nicely on the vacuum and pulling around the unit works just as well as it did when I didn't have it attached. I recommend getting one you will be happy you did.

Offline them700project

  • Posts: 45
Re: Ct 26 efficiency
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2017, 08:57 AM »
I run the ct26 for kapex, domino,of1400, and all sanders. I ran it at 65% or so and added ultimate dust deputy and just added 10% or so. It ddnt seem to impact me at all. The added benefit will be not clogging bags.

I just emptied my DD on friday and was amazed at how fine the stuff it was collecting actually was.