Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Fine Woodworking(Tool Guide): Bosch Vac VS. Festool Vac  (Read 2971 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jalvis

Offline Offline

Location: USA
Member Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 251


« on: February 26, 2012, 09:43 PM »

What does everyone think about the review?

Bosch wins due to the auto clean function.  Maintains the same suction from beginning to end while the Festool seems to really decline.

I have never used the Bosch.  Whats the verdict?
Logged
Festool USA does not pre-approve the contents of this website nor endorse the application or use of any Festool product in any way other than in the manner described in the Festool Instruction Manual. To reduce the risk of serious injury and/or damage to your Festool product, always read, understand and follow all warnings and instructions in your Festool product's Instruction Manual. Although Festool strives for accuracy in the website material, the website may contain inaccuracies. Festool makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness or timeliness of the material on this website or about the results to be obtained from using the website. Festool and its affiliates cannot be responsible for improper postings or your reliance on the website's material. Your use of any material contained on this website is entirely at your own risk. The content contained on this site is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.

Ken Nagrod
Restricted

Offline Offline

Location: New Jersey
Member Since: Jul 2010
Posts: 3438



« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2012, 09:46 PM »

Previously discussed, heated thread.  Do a search for it or maybe someone can provide you the link.  My opinion, use the article to keep warm on a winter's morn'.   Big Grin
Logged
Jalvis

Offline Offline

Location: USA
Member Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 251


« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2012, 09:54 PM »

Searched before asking but couldn't find it.  Maybe a link? 
Logged
EWTHeckman

Offline Offline

Location: USA
Member Since: Aug 2011
Posts: 288



« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2012, 09:56 PM »

Searched before asking but couldn't find it.  Maybe a link? 


Here
Logged

Ed "What the" Heckman
Jalvis

Offline Offline

Location: USA
Member Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 251


« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2012, 09:59 PM »

Thank you
Logged
billg71

Offline Offline

Location: lost in the NW Atlanta 'burbs
Member Since: Nov 2010
Posts: 147


WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2012, 10:50 PM »

Quick shot of the Bosch vac working with their SCMS:



Not the most impressive DC demo I've seen... And it's FREAKING NOISY to boot...

FWIW,
Bill
« Last Edit: February 26, 2012, 10:52 PM by billg71 » Logged

"Born to fish, forced to work..."
SRSemenza
Global Moderator

Offline Offline

Location: UNITED STATES (US)
Member Since: Jun 2007
Posts: 4021


Finger Lakes Region, NY State , USA


« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2012, 06:31 PM »

Can't say about the Bosch havn't used it. But my Festool doesn't seem to have a suction problem. It may drop off but not to any degree that I notice until bag is nearly full. So if it drops off I'm not sure it matters much. Heck I have accidentally filled  20' of hose because the bag was full and I didn't know it.


Seth
Logged

Seth R. Semenza
 
S. R. Semenza Woodworking


Festool Service 800-554-8741
otis04

Offline Offline

Location: USA
Member Since: Jan 2011
Posts: 60


« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2012, 07:17 PM »

We pay a high price for our festools and therefore believe them to be the best.  Therefore, I do understand the outrage over an article that dared to rate another manufacturer better than Festool.  But, the real measure of the Festool equipment is that it all works together and very well, so I don't care about one part of the system getting a low rating as the sum of the parts is greater than the whole.

Just a different perspective.
Logged
Ken Nagrod
Restricted

Offline Offline

Location: New Jersey
Member Since: Jul 2010
Posts: 3438



« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2012, 07:19 PM »

We pay a high price for our festools and therefore believe them to be the best.  Therefore, I do understand the outrage over an article that dared to rate another manufacturer better than Festool.  But, the real measure of the Festool equipment is that it all works together and very well, so I don't care about one part of the system getting a low rating as the sum of the parts is greater than the whole.

Just a different perspective.

That wasn't the outrage.  The test method was.  Read it and you'll understand.
Logged
RL

Online Online

Location: Canada
Member Since: Feb 2010
Posts: 2124



« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2012, 08:01 PM »

In that picture, is the hose even connected?
Logged

I like green.
Dan Clark

Offline Offline

Location: Bellevue, WA USA
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 387



WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2012, 08:34 PM »

We pay a high price for our festools and therefore believe them to be the best.  Therefore, I do understand the outrage over an article that dared to rate another manufacturer better than Festool.  But, the real measure of the Festool equipment is that it all works together and very well, so I don't care about one part of the system getting a low rating as the sum of the parts is greater than the whole.

Just a different perspective.

That wasn't the outrage.  The test method was.  Read it and you'll understand.
+1

Most of us are not concerned about who "wins".  That's a marketing concept, not a real-world user issue for most of the people in this forum.  Their testing methodology was rather badly flawed.   It's like comparing a TS55 to a Makita hypoid saw and rating the Makita better because it doesn't require a rail.  

When purchasing, we want quality info to make good buying decisions.  Historically Fine Woodworking has done a good job of supplying this quality info.   This review indicates that their quality is slipping.   Badly.   Failure to properly categorize tools makes results questionable at best.

Regards,

Dan.

Logged
greg mann

Offline Offline

Location: Michigan
Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 1130


« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2012, 09:09 PM »

To sum up the logic used in the test:

 We are going to test a Cadillac versus a Yugo. We have decided that most buyers will dislike purchasing gas so we are going to test the cars without fuel. The Yugo wins because it is easier to push.
Logged

Greg Mann
Oakland, Michigan
Ken Nagrod
Restricted

Offline Offline

Location: New Jersey
Member Since: Jul 2010
Posts: 3438



« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2012, 09:22 PM »

To sum up the logic used in the test:

 We are going to test a Cadillac versus a Yugo. We have decided that most buyers will dislike purchasing gas so we are going to test the cars without fuel. The Yugo wins because it is easier to push.

 Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Thumbs Up
Logged
sancho57

Online Online

Location: So Cal USA
Member Since: Jan 2011
Posts: 1086



« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2012, 09:26 PM »

I dont care what a magazine says or actually what anyone says.

When the tools I buy and use work as well or better then expected how can someone tell me they dont/

If that makes sense.

As for FWW I quit all my taunton press subscriptions about 2 years ago or so. last year I trashed just about all the of their magazines I was collecting.

I did find a FHB one from a few years back in my office. it had a article about track saws. Today I checked it out and it showed a festool TS55 being used w/o a dust collector attached. It looked pretty dusty.

But they did give FT a pretty good review.
Logged

Shhhhhh Dont tell the wife butttttt I bought another…….
billg71

Offline Offline

Location: lost in the NW Atlanta 'burbs
Member Since: Nov 2010
Posts: 147


WWW
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2012, 09:55 PM »

In that picture, is the hose even connected?

Yes it was. That was the Bosch booth at the Woodworking Show last year in Atlanta, not long after they introduced the new miter saw. I wandered by mid-afternoon and couldn't help thinking at least they could clean up occasionally. Granted, that's probably the fallout from a few hundred cuts but it really doesn't look good when you're demo-ing a new saw and touting it's dust collection. I thought it was kinda funny so I snapped a pic.

Best,
Bill
Logged

"Born to fish, forced to work..."
VictorL

Offline Offline

Location: South-Central CT
Member Since: Feb 2007
Posts: 539


« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2012, 10:40 PM »

It looks like Bosch was tested with standard 36mm hose. Festool's vacs shipped with 27mm hoses. 36mm hose makes HUGE difference in dust collection. It's not noticeable with portable sanders, but using it with TS-55/75/Kapex saws, routers and cleaning  sets makes it noticeable. I use 36mm hoses with CT-26 and CT-mini. For Domino and sanders I use hose adapter. If FWW tested vacs with same hoses, they should get MUCH better CFM rating for CT-26 vacuum.

VictorL
Logged
Dan Clark

Offline Offline

Location: Bellevue, WA USA
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 387



WWW
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2012, 10:53 PM »

It looks like Bosch was tested with standard 36mm hose. Festool's vacs shipped with 27mm hoses. 36mm hose makes HUGE difference in dust collection. It's not noticeable with portable sanders, but using it with TS-55/75/Kapex saws, routers and cleaning  sets makes it noticeable. I use 36mm hoses with CT-26 and CT-mini. For Domino and sanders I use hose adapter. If FWW tested vacs with same hoses, they should get MUCH better CFM rating for CT-26 vacuum.

VictorL
It's interesting that FWW tested using unreasonable metrics that put the CT vacs at a disadvantage.  OTOH, if they wanted even the playing field, they could have used the Festool 36mm hose.   It seems odd that they chose metrics that were tailored to the Bosch vacs.   Very strange.   Just sayin'...    Roll Eyes

Dan.
Logged
matt.mackinnon

Offline Offline

Location: Canada
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 25


« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2012, 10:56 PM »

To sum up the logic used in the test:

 We are going to test a Cadillac versus a Yugo. We have decided that most buyers will dislike purchasing gas so we are going to test the cars without fuel. The Yugo wins because it is easier to push.

No, it's more like testing a Cadallac vs a GM Volt.   Then saying the Cadallac would not start because we could not figure out where to plug in the electric charging cord.

Logged
EWTHeckman

Offline Offline

Location: USA
Member Since: Aug 2011
Posts: 288



« Reply #18 on: February 27, 2012, 11:11 PM »

Come to think of it, the testing methodology in the article would be appropriate for the CT 36 AC. Is the AC designed for the same market as that Bosch?
Logged

Ed "What the" Heckman
Jerry Sitton

Offline Offline

Location: Greenwood In
Member Since: Nov 2010
Posts: 53


« Reply #19 on: February 27, 2012, 11:26 PM »

I've got an older power mad shop vac that'll beat both, but is it better! No, it's loud  and bulkier. The CT is perfect for the tools I hook it to and it's so quiet compared. If all I was concerned with was cfm and velocity I wouldn't own either. To me, that's not what makes the CT's so attractive in the actual application.
Logged
Kev

Online Online

Location: Australia
Member Since: Nov 2011
Posts: 2460



« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2012, 10:11 AM »

On the OP question regarding what people think of the review ... I'm a little jaded from my experience with commercial publications. I think the reviews and comparisons of this nature of of very little value. Magazines are filled up with articles to create some space between the advertising - that's about it.

Logged
Alan m

Online Online

Location: Ireland
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 2998



« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2012, 11:22 AM »

On the OP question regarding what people think of the review ... I'm a little jaded from my experience with commercial publications. I think the reviews and comparisons of this nature of of very little value. Magazines are filled up with articles to create some space between the advertising - that's about it.



i have to agree. iv bought good woodworking,FWW,FHB,furniture and cabinet making ( the best) ,the woodworker,american woodworker,wood and a few more. most of them are full of crap now. i wont but too many more as im sick of the crap. their reviews are flawed like the FWW on in question or full of either basic info or restoration type builds. any time there is a review of something i would like to know more about it is too short and not acurate enough info.
and the price has rocketed up but the quality down
Logged

now
ts 55+2 1400 rails+ 1 lr32 1400 rail, domino+assortment systainer+ domiplate, ct 22 with boom arm+home made thien baffel, lr32 set, rotex 150, home made MFT,home made work center, 6 t locs for other tools, of2000 , ro 90, mft 800, trion , ls 130
wish list
of 1400, MFT 3,, even more t locs for other tools


"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: