bruegf
Offline
Location: Michigan Member Since: Mar 2007
Posts: 729
Michigan
|
 |
« on: February 22, 2008, 09:03 AM » |
|
Matthew,
The new format looks great! Thanks for all of your efforts.
Fred
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fred
|
|
|
Matthew Schenker
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 2624
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2008, 09:22 AM » |
|
Fred, Thanks!
The only thing I hate about this process is having to take down and re-upload everything to the forum server databse. I've got to save the forum files, delete everything from the server, FTP the unique files back onto the server and re-install all the unique stuff. As always, my FTP server timed out in the middle of the transfer, and I was left hanging for a while waiting to know what stage I am at.
Anyone here who ever does database backups certainly knows what I'm talking about!
But everything is up and running now and we can enjoy the new design.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
woodgeek
Offline
Location: Bellingham, WA; USA Member Since: Jun 2007
Posts: 161
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2008, 09:26 AM » |
|
it really does look great! seems quicker too!
c.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
no matter where you go, there you are...
|
|
|
Joemac
Offline
Location: Chicago, Il. Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 46
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2008, 09:27 AM » |
|
Lots of work but a great design. Very user friendly and visually attractive. I do have one question though, what is that strange machine on top? It looks like a miter saw but us readheaded stepchildren in the US have no experience with a Festool miter saw! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Frank Pellow
Offline
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 2390
Toronto, Ontario, CANADA
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2008, 09:32 AM » |
|
Matthew, I like the new look and I appreciate all the effort that it took you to achieve it. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cheers, Frank (Festool connoisseur)
|
|
|
bruegf
Offline
Location: Michigan Member Since: Mar 2007
Posts: 729
Michigan
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2008, 09:33 AM » |
|
Matthew,
I know exactly what you mean. I develop engineering web applications for Whirlpool and our server is currently seeing approx 100K+ hits per day all of them requiring anywhere from 1 to over 50 SQL calls to populate the data for the pages. Stuff that's easy to do when you're dealing w/ a few K of data becomes extremely difficult where you're dealing w/ a few gig of data.
Thx again for your efforts.
Fred
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fred
|
|
|
Matthew Schenker
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 2624
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2008, 09:44 AM » |
|
I know exactly what you mean. I develop engineering web applications for Whirlpool and our server is currently seeing approx 100K+ hits per day all of them requiring anywhere from 1 to over 50 SQL calls to populate the data for the pages. Stuff that's easy to do when you're dealing w/ a few K of data becomes extremely difficult where you're dealing w/ a few gig of data. Well, we're not seeing 100,000 hots a day here (not yet, anyway). We see about 12,000 - 14,000 on a typical day. But there are a number of modifications I have made over the past year or so, and of course we have all the attachments that need to be kept up. It's a good challenge, and a great feeling when everything is back up and running properly. Matthew
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 22, 2008, 10:07 AM by Matthew Schenker »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TahoeTwoBears
Offline
Location: South Lake Tahoe, California Member Since: Jun 2007
Posts: 194
Sugar Bear - South Lake Tahoe, California, USA
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2008, 09:57 AM » |
|
Matthew,
Great Job!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
After all of your hard work, I hesitate to ask, but is there any way to add a home button on the bottom of the page? I frequently look at the first page for the latest posts. When I finish reading a thread, then I typically jump back to the home page to find yet another new post. Perhaps I'm being inefficient and there's a better way to keep up, but that's how I currently operate. I guess better than a home button would be a button on the bottom of the page that would take me to the Member's Info Center or latest post list.
Thanks for all of the fantastic work you're doing. This is the only community that's stable in my life right now and I truly appreciate the feeling of home, especially given my family's current circumstances.
Thank you very much,
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FesGeek
Offline
Location: Raleigh, NC Member Since: Feb 2008
Posts: 21
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: February 22, 2008, 10:22 AM » |
|
Awesome, now that we are updated we are cool people again....hehe. Not like we weren't already cool because we know one thing others don't...they may have more tools, but our tools have more tricks than theirs (and will last longer!!!)
--Jason
(I will update my forum profile when I get a cool avatar done)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Daviddubya
Offline
Location: Cave Creek, AZ, USA Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 703
Arizona, USA
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2008, 10:24 AM » |
|
...is there any way to add a home button on the bottom of the page? I frequently look at the first page for the latest posts. When I finish reading a thread, then I typically jump back to the home page to find yet another new post.... Mike
Matthew - good job. Looking good! Mike - A couple of shortcuts might work for you. The Back button on your browser takes you one page backwards. Or I frequently use the Home key on the keyboard to get back to the top of any page. From there you can click on the Home button on the screen. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 22, 2008, 10:25 AM by Daviddubya »
|
Logged
|
David W. Falkenstein in Cave Creek, AZ, USA
|
|
|
Ned
Offline
Location: Mountains of Southern California Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 0
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: February 22, 2008, 11:35 AM » |
|
Matthew--
Up and looking good.
I agree with Woodgeek, FOG seems to be running faster. This could be because of the new theme, but it's more likely a side effect of unloading and reloading the database. Either way, slick.
Ned
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Matthew Schenker
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 2624
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: February 22, 2008, 11:55 AM » |
|
I agree with Woodgeek, FOG seems to be running faster. This could be because of the new theme, but it's more likely a side effect of unloading and reloading the database. Either way, slick. I am not a database expert, but perhaps it's true that the maintenance helped. I cleaned out all the unnecessary logs, and I optimized all the database tables. Also, there were bits and pieces of code changes and lines from various modifications I had previously tried and uninstalled. Reinstalling the forum software from scratch cleaned all that up. I also got rid of a couple of logging applications that were hogging system resources for no good reason (one in particular is called "Urchin"). Doing this kind of maintenance is great for revealing areas that need attention. Matthew
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 22, 2008, 11:56 AM by Matthew Schenker »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dan Clark
Offline
Location: Bellevue, WA USA Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 387
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2008, 12:38 PM » |
|
Matthew, Great job! In the last few months, you've done a great job of integrating lots of differing feedback from many people. Awesome work! I understand the hassle of loading databases. For example, Wednesday evening I started a DB load before leaving work. Normally it takes 6-9 hours because the load is pretty large. It crunches about 3/4 TB of data from several very large tables, moves it to another DB, aggregates it, crunches some more, and finally loads a few thousand rows of highly munged data into target tables. Sometime in the middle of the night it blew up - the worst one I've seen in a long time. It's either a major network failure or the server ran out of space. Yesterday, the database was in recovery mode all day. I'm not sure if it's corrupt or just taking a long time to roll back. I'm off work today. Monday should be "interesting".  Regards, Dan.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ned
Offline
Location: Mountains of Southern California Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 0
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: February 22, 2008, 12:41 PM » |
|
Monday should be "interesting".
Boring is better. Interesting hurts.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve Jones
Offline
Location: Austin, Texas Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 405
Austin, TX US
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: February 22, 2008, 12:50 PM » |
|
Mathew,
great job! site looks very professional.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
poto
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Feb 2007
Posts: 406
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: February 22, 2008, 02:02 PM » |
|
Wow! What a change! It's bright and readable - very clean and professional. And it definitely runs faster. Great work Matthew. I feel privileged to be part of this group.
Poto
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Joe Jensen
Offline
Location: Phoenix AZ Area Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 140
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: February 22, 2008, 02:09 PM » |
|
Love it, much more clear
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flyfisher
Offline
Location: UNITED STATES (US) Member Since: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: February 22, 2008, 08:55 PM » |
|
Matthew, Nicely done. I like the clean, modern look. Much like Festools!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Eli
Offline
Location: Melbourne, Australia Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 2480
A Yankee in Kangaroo Court
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2008, 02:57 AM » |
|
Thanks for all the hard work Matthew. I love the place you've made.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do nothing, stay ahead.
|
|
|
Dave Rudy
Offline
Location: Colorado Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 752
Coloroda Front Range, in the lee of Pikes Peak
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2008, 11:37 AM » |
|
Fantastic job, Matthew. You're number 1 all over again!
Thanks.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|