Is Festool's patent expired on the TS saws?

Lou Miller

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
480
This thread is running over on Woodnet right now. I believe I've seen it mentioned here before, but this one guy says that a Makita rep told him the patent was up on Festool's saws. I just found that to be very interesting and was wondering if anyone knew the actual scoop? Everything about the Makita version seems to be an exact copy of the Festool saw. Except for one feature they've incorporated that would be awesome to have on our saws. Its some kind of anti-tip device that keeps the saw on the rail during bevel cuts.
 
Lou,

Good question. Festool's saws have been around since the 1960's, so I would have thought any patents would have been expired long ago. Mafell has a somewhat similar saw that's been available for a while now.

Bob
 
Festool's plunge saws probably incorporate multiple patents over a fairly long time period. The lack of a riving knife on the Makita version could be a result of the patent on the riving knife being more recent, and therefore not expired. Just speculating here. Perhaps Makita will offer a riving knife in a few more years, but, if there is a new patent on the TS's telescoping version, Makita's will probably be of a fixed variety. While I can't come up with a good example right now it is not uncommon for the clones to be a generation behind the standard bearer unless the cloner can come up with a techological leapfrogging of the original. I find it interesting that the Makita version appears to be so high priced. The WoodNet thread made it out like the Makita reps were surprised to find this out. Apparently they were never in on the pricing decisions or ,quite likely, there are a whole lot of folks who have underestimated the true cost of making these tools.
 
I don't know the state of their patent(s), but this looks like a classic IP licensing deal to me. If Makita is smart, and I believe they are, they will strive for maximum interchangeability with Festool components and their stuff. The lack of a riving knife may be because Festool wanted to keep some things to themselves, to help with differentiation. It appears, from the data sheet, however, that the Makikta doesn't use the same size blades as the TS55 (165 vs 160 mm).

Makita has huge market share in the US, as well as enormous distribution channels. Festool is still relatively unknown. Licensing to a 3rd party who can bring out a lower priced line could provide Festool revenue from customers they might otherwise never obtain. And if the guide rail system becomes ubiquitous, Festool will benefit from the wide range of products that work with it, as well as becoming an upsell brand for people already used to the paradigm.

Or, I could be full of horse manure.

John
 
John,

Everything you say makes sense except the early indications are that the Makita is not lower priced. That's a puzzle to me.
 
The Woodnet thread says the Makita saw and guide rail is is priced at $650 Canadian.  That translates to about the same in today's US dollars.  The TS55 and guide rail is priced at $440 USD.  Hmmm.  One wonders what the US price will really be for the Makita when it becomes available.  The Makita rail looks just like the Festool rail.  I wonder if the rails are interchangeable?  Interesting!

It does not look like the Makita has a chip guard on the outside of the blade.  More like the older ATF55?
 
I have been to other forums where, when festool is mentioned, all sorts of flags and firestorms break out and go on and on and on.  almost like real hatred.  It would be interresting to see reaction to Makita coming out with a copycat product.

Tinker

 
greg mann said:
John,

Everything you say makes sense except the early indications are that the Makita is not lower priced. That's a puzzle to me.

Is it possible that the Makita is better?
 
The Woodentop said:
Is it possible that the Makita is better?

For one thing the Makita does not have a riving knife, which is a big safety feature in my opinion.  Although if they make the anti-tipping better that would be a good thing.  And it is also not clear whether the motor electronics will have soft start and sense of jamming/blade retractal.

Vijay
 
The Woodentop said:
...Is it possible that the Makita is better?

Since Festool has been making their saw for a very long time, and Makita appears to be copying it, I doubt that the first version from Makita will be as good as the current Festool version.  That's not a Festool rant!  I like Makita and have several of their tools.  From the spec sheet, it appears the Makita is a sweet saw, and will be an interesting alternative to Festool.

Vijay - If you reread the spec sheet from the Woodnet thread you will see the Makita has the following motor features:

Electronic Control
- Soft start
- Overload protector
- Constant speed
- Variable speed by dial (for optimum cutting speed)
- Mechanical Brake
 
johnbro said:
I don't know the state of their patent(s), but this looks like a classic IP licensing deal to me. If Makita is smart, and I believe they are, they will strive for maximum interchangeability with Festool components and their stuff. The lack of a riving knife may be because Festool wanted to keep some things to themselves, to help with differentiation. It appears, from the data sheet, however, that the Makikta doesn't use the same size blades as the TS55 (165 vs 160 mm).

Makita has huge market share in the US, as well as enormous distribution channels. Festool is still relatively unknown. Licensing to a 3rd party who can bring out a lower priced line could provide Festool revenue from customers they might otherwise never obtain. And if the guide rail system becomes ubiquitous, Festool will benefit from the wide range of products that work with it, as well as becoming an upsell brand for people already used to the paradigm.

Or, I could be full of horse manure.

John

ubiquitous  Them is fighting words if ever.  I use a dry lube on my guide rails and polish them to sub-ubiquitous level.  The extra green stripe has helped greatly in approaching ubiquitousness. The EZ people may think they are ubiquitous, but are really just full of [Matthew's spell check deleted this word or phrase so I will have to be satisfied with unubiquitous.
 
We need to be fair. If it's better....it's better.

I can't stand people who want Australia to win because they themselves are Australian. I want Australia to win because they are better at whatever sport. Failing that I want the best team to win.

Let's not get all anal over Festool?
 
Daviddubya said:
The Woodentop said:
We need to be fair. If it's better....it's better....

And if it's not, it's not.  Right?

The Woodentop said:
...Let's not get all anal over Festool?

Why not - after all this the FESTOOL Owners Group.

OK pal, you get anal over it if you really must. I'm going to try and be constructive instead.

Oh and don't you just like the soft start motors? Pity Festool can't get around to making that improvement.
 
As a retailer, I can't afford to be too biased. If the Makita item is a better version, we may have to sell it.

However, I'll say this about Festool. They have this vision of a system that's hard to beat. Other guys may get in here and there and make something similar but without the overall concept of the vision, who knows what their staying power will be? I know Festool plans to have the TS saws available in good numbers for years on end. I don't know if another manufacturer (and this isn't a dig at Makita at all) has the wherewithal to stick it out if the market is tougher than they'd anticipated.

I'm like that with automobiles. I'm on my 3rd Ford (one Thunderbird, two Explorers). I'd be shocked if I read Ford didn't plan to continue the Explorer into the future. I see other models that have features that I might like better but I also see those same models disappearing after a few years. What happens to parts and/or ongoing support then?

I have a ton of respect for Makita and if they're making the commitment to stay in this product line, I have no reason to doubt them. I also don't think a Festool fan is being prejudiced if he or she says they'll wait and see. Once you know what you like, it's hard to switch and that's especially true when you are certain the company you like plans to maintain their focus!

Just my $0.02 ($0.01 if you convert it to Canadian currency).

 
Ron,

You know, you're really going to have to stop driving vehicles like the Explorer. I have a huge respect for the USA and Canada with many colleagues over there but you guys have got the big car thing ALL wrong. When will you begin to realise that the fuel you are wasting isn't coming from a bottomless pit?

Sorry to go OT.

As regards Festool/Makita, point taken. I love Festool but I just don't want to take it to bed with me!
 
The Woodentop said:
Oh and don't you just like the soft start motors? Pity Festool can't get around to making that improvement.

Am I missing something here? Doesn't the Festool saw have a soft start to it? As much as I've used it, I really can't say for sure that it does. Its not like a typical saw though, but do they consider it a soft start? Sure sounds and feels like it to me, but I've never actually read that any where. A soft start isn't really needed either way though. As long as the saw doesn't have that initial torque surge on start up like a Skil wormdrive has, then it's fine, IMO.

I don't care much for having an allegiance to any particular brand. The bottom line to me is whatever works best is what works best. I own tools from just about every major manufacturer except Ryobi (I can't believe that people actually think their tools are worth buying). Of all of the saws I've used, and its a lot of different saws, the Festool saw is easily the best I've used in this class of saw (the Skil wormdrive is the absolute best IMO, but its a totally different class of tool). If Makita ends up making a better one, then more power to them. If and when my Festool saw dies or gets stolen or whatever, I'll take a long look at the Makita. I'm a huge fan of their impact drivers, cordless drills and their miter saws, so I wouldn't shy away from them for any reason. However, they'd need to convince me that they are better.

Having said that, I don't see anything at all in the description that would lead me to believe this Makita saw is better than the TS series saws from Festool. I do think the anti-tip feature is a great idea and wish that was part of TS55 set up. Given the choice between the anti-tip and the riving knife though, I'd much rather have the retractable riving knife.

I think it was Dave who said that the $650 asking price for this is basically inline with what Festool is charging for the TS55. I'm not sure I get that though. Festool wants $440 (US) for the TS55 today and the US dollar is currently weaker than the Canadian dollar. So that $650 Canadian is what? Closer to $700  (US) for a copycat? No thanks. At a difference of ~$260, there's no question that the Festool is the better buy. I have to think that the stated price of $650 for that Makita saw is incorrect.

One thing that any manufacturer could do with these copycat saws to gain a leg up on Festool is to use a standard 5/8" arbor (well, that's the standard in the US anyway, I don't know about the rest of the world). Having the ability to buy very cheap blades to use as throw aways for certain operations would be a major plus to me. You can get the arbor hole enlarged, but its not worth it for a throw away blade. I didn't bother to read whether Makita has done this, but they certainly should. Festool should really offer some kind of bushing that would allow blades with a 5/8" arbor hole to work on their saw too. However, the overall size of the blade with the 55 would still be an issue. Not so much for the 75s. Being limited to only the blades that Festool offers is a very big drawback to their saw IMO. Obviously, it wasn't enough of one to stop me from buying it though. You couldn't get me to give it up either, so it really isn't much of an issue.
 
I got me a lil' cup-a-feel on the Makita saw + rail last weekend and two thinks strike me, or maybe three or - who's counting anyway:

Firstly: rail looks just like Festool's but as they didn't sell Festool at that shop I could not verify this.
Secondly: machine seems solid - nice feel to all knobs etc. Makita quality for sure.
Thirdly: The rail tip-guard works great, clever design. Miss this on the Festool.
Moreoverly: rail was not as smooth as Festool + TS55, but still smooth.
Evenmoreso-overly: Price is more or less exactly the same as for the TS55 + rail - actually the rail seems even more expensive if I recall price on Festool right. (Swedish prices)

The Makita is not a budget machine by any means but given the greater number of dealers sporting Makita I am sure they will shift a lot of those circular saws over time. Even if they are the same price as Festool. A winner? Well, a contender for sure.
 
The Woodentop said:
We need to be fair. If it's better....it's better.

I can't stand people who want Australia to win because they themselves are Australian. I want Australia to win because they are better at whatever sport. Failing that I want the best team to win.

Let's not get all anal over Festool?

" From the spec sheet, it appears the Makita is a sweet saw, and will be an interesting alternative to Festool." Daviddubbya

Woodentop,

I don't think this would be a quote from someone all anal over Festool. Perhaps you missed this? Without mentioning another party who has minions out there proclaiming the "vastly superior" performance of their product over Festool, just how much better could it be? Straight, splinter-free cuts, et.al. are what we all want and get. On the other hand, perhaps Festool will take note and come up with an anti-tipping solution of their own. Even the most die-hard Festoolian would welcome that.

It will be interesting to see if Makita follows with router attachments for their guiderail, eh?
 
Back
Top