So I'm looking for a rectangular finish sander, mainly comparing these two. I already have an ets 150/3 for large flat surfaces, but I need something that can sand into corners and along raised edges. I like the rectangular pad shape over the dts 400 because it allows sanding sheet rotation to balance wear. The specs on these two look similar with respect to pad and motor output, obviously with the difference being the orbital/linear motion.
I'm leaning towards the ls 130 because, in theory, it would sand better along raised edges, and the pad change out for different profiles could be useful in the future (not an immediate need, and seemingly quite spendy).
My questions are...
1. Does the sanding pattern on the ls 130 limit its effectiveness on the same uses that the rts would be good for? Ive read that sanding with the ls 130 is really slow, but wasn't sure if it was much different than the rts.
2. Does the ls 130 sanding motion leave large scratches or poor finishes in comparison to the orbital motion? I'm worried that the grits may have the urge to track into the wood, leaving a deep pattern on the coarser grits that would be extremely difficult to remove with the finer grits.
Thanks for everyone's help.
I'm leaning towards the ls 130 because, in theory, it would sand better along raised edges, and the pad change out for different profiles could be useful in the future (not an immediate need, and seemingly quite spendy).
My questions are...
1. Does the sanding pattern on the ls 130 limit its effectiveness on the same uses that the rts would be good for? Ive read that sanding with the ls 130 is really slow, but wasn't sure if it was much different than the rts.
2. Does the ls 130 sanding motion leave large scratches or poor finishes in comparison to the orbital motion? I'm worried that the grits may have the urge to track into the wood, leaving a deep pattern on the coarser grits that would be extremely difficult to remove with the finer grits.
Thanks for everyone's help.