Packard
Member
Mercedes announced that it is adding heated seatbelts, which they consider a safety feature. It was also noted that they were early adopters of heated seats and remote start for that same reason.
To help understand that, they explained that seatbelts are most effective when fitted tightly against the torso. Heavy winter clothes works against that objective.
The remote start meant that the cabin could be reasonably warm when the driver arrived. The heated seats meant that removing the overcoat was now reasonable, but the ice-cold seatbelts worked against that idea. The heated seatbelts would close the loop and make driving wearing indoor-suitable clothing feasible.
I tested the premise (except for the seatbelts) this morning. It was 8 degrees F when I woke up this morning. Before going out, I hit the remote start. My van automatically turns on the heated seats at temperatures below 40 degrees F. I wore my easiest on/off jacket (a waist length down jacket), and shed it as soon as I entered the car.
First of all, heated seats are far more effective when I did not wear an overcoat. Against my shirt it seemed downright hot.
The cabin was reasonably warm when I entered.
The seatbelts were probably cold, but I took no notice.
I must say that driving with a shirt and no jacket is more pleasant than driving all bundled up. I’m sure that the seatbelts were more tightly applied (it’s all automatic). Almost all of my trips are 15 minutes or less in duration. I think the premise works better for people taking longer trips. (My to-work trip was an hour.)
I think a constant on/off of my jacket for short trips might be tiresome. But I am giving it a try.
When I was in college (Syracuse, NY) and I would drive home, I would always take off my overcoat for that trip. I did not have a down jacket back then and my coat was bulky and stiff. And the trip was about 6 hours, so worth the effort. But this is the first I am trying this tactic since then. I am curious as to how it works out.
To help understand that, they explained that seatbelts are most effective when fitted tightly against the torso. Heavy winter clothes works against that objective.
The remote start meant that the cabin could be reasonably warm when the driver arrived. The heated seats meant that removing the overcoat was now reasonable, but the ice-cold seatbelts worked against that idea. The heated seatbelts would close the loop and make driving wearing indoor-suitable clothing feasible.
I tested the premise (except for the seatbelts) this morning. It was 8 degrees F when I woke up this morning. Before going out, I hit the remote start. My van automatically turns on the heated seats at temperatures below 40 degrees F. I wore my easiest on/off jacket (a waist length down jacket), and shed it as soon as I entered the car.
First of all, heated seats are far more effective when I did not wear an overcoat. Against my shirt it seemed downright hot.
The cabin was reasonably warm when I entered.
The seatbelts were probably cold, but I took no notice.
I must say that driving with a shirt and no jacket is more pleasant than driving all bundled up. I’m sure that the seatbelts were more tightly applied (it’s all automatic). Almost all of my trips are 15 minutes or less in duration. I think the premise works better for people taking longer trips. (My to-work trip was an hour.)
I think a constant on/off of my jacket for short trips might be tiresome. But I am giving it a try.
When I was in college (Syracuse, NY) and I would drive home, I would always take off my overcoat for that trip. I did not have a down jacket back then and my coat was bulky and stiff. And the trip was about 6 hours, so worth the effort. But this is the first I am trying this tactic since then. I am curious as to how it works out.