The saw running or not should make no difference to the guard operating or not.bevans said:My guard will work when I pull the trigger and start the saw but just pulling the trigger no longer allows the saw to lower.
If I manually lift the guard it allows the blade to lower.
TXFIVEO said:Now another issue to add to the Kapex list...as much as I would love to have one I just can’t see anyone getting one with any peace of mind that it will be a work horse in their shop.
Michael Kellough said:Rob, what is the voltage of your Kapex? There have been relatively few problems reported here about saws with the 220v motors.
Please be more realistic! Problems with mitre saw guards have always happened, especially out on site, regardless of brand or model. You have a DW which has had no issues. Well I have a DW which has gone through no less than three return springs in 7 years (mainly due to knots being kicked out of the blade) whilst my Kapex has been faultless to date. I don't complain. I just do the necessary service work, Does that say anything about the respective brands or models? Nothing, I'd say. If you are going to "diss" a tool, at least pick on something you have some depth of experience inTXFIVEO said:Now another issue to add to the Kapex list...as much as I would love to have one I just can’t see anyone getting one with any peace of mind that it will be a work horse in their shop
Stupid? The reason that UK construction sites favour 110v is that the supplying/isolating transformer is centre tapped to earth. Giving supply characteristics of 55 - 0 - 55v.Rob-GB said:110v via transformer due to stupid regulations on UK building sites.
I would say earth leakage circuit breakers would do the trick without the need to drop the voltage level, avoiding the downside of increasing the amperage requirement (and the downsides that has).Job and Knock said:It's the trailing leads that are really the hazard on a site because they so often run through water (puddle on the floor) and because they are so frequently damaged - often in my case by idiots driving MEWPs (scissor lifts) across them. That's why when you are running a site it is imperative to examine and condemn defective extension cables on a regular basis as well as to insist on regular (3 monthly) PAT testing on cables in particular
Job and Knock said:Please be more realistic! Problems with mitre saw guards have always happened, especially out on site, regardless of brand or model. You have a DW which has had no issues. Well I have a DW which has gone through no less than three return springs in 7 years (mainly due to knots being kicked out of the blade) whilst my Kapex has been faultless to date. I don't complain. I just do the necessary service work, Does that say anything about the respective brands or models? Nothing, I'd say. If you are going to "diss" a tool, at least pick on something you have some depth of experience inTXFIVEO said:Now another issue to add to the Kapex list...as much as I would love to have one I just can’t see anyone getting one with any peace of mind that it will be a work horse in their shop
I was actually referring to your comments about the blade guard. In site use blade guards are often subject to abuse and lack of maintainance, so saying "Now another issue to add to the Kapex list..." was just point scoring, IMHO. I'm not defending the Kapex in this instance.TXFIVEO said:I would wager you an enormous amount that there are thousands more Dewalt DWS780’s in the field than Kapexs with a higher percentage of the downed units being Kapex. Any tool can and will fail unexpectedly, but the same issue seams to come up with the Kapex time and time again. Don’t get so defensive, it is a well known issue with the Kapex. Do the research and work and you will know. Remove the blinders and you will see so much more..
I have worked on jobs in Europe where RCDs on 230 volt power are mandated and I've noted that if the RCD keeps tripping the general approach isn't always to check the cables and the tool to find the fault lies - more often the approach is to "rig" the RCD or even remove it so that work can proceed. Not safe practice at all! I've had belts off 230 volts and it felt like I was being bitten (I experienced it quite often on jobs in the Netherlands) - 55 volts (110 volt centre tapped) is nowhere near as unpleasant if you get a shock off it. In 47 years I've had just one or twoGregor said:I would say earth leakage circuit breakers would do the trick without the need to drop the voltage level, avoiding the downside of increasing the amperage requirement (and the downsides that has).Job and Knock said:It's the trailing leads that are really the hazard on a site because they so often run through water (puddle on the floor) and because they are so frequently damaged - often in my case by idiots driving MEWPs (scissor lifts) across them. That's why when you are running a site it is imperative to examine and condemn defective extension cables on a regular basis as well as to insist on regular (3 monthly) PAT testing on cables in particular
Rigging or removing (electrical or not) safety devices is beyond stupid and shouldn't be done, ever.Job and Knock said:I have worked on jobs in Europe where RCDs on 230 volt power are mandated and I've noted that if the RCD keeps tripping the general approach isn't always to check the cables and the tool to find the fault lies - more often the approach is to "rig" the RCD or even remove it so that work can proceed. Not safe practice at all!Gregor said:I would say earth leakage circuit breakers would do the trick without the need to drop the voltage level, avoiding the downside of increasing the amperage requirement (and the downsides that has).