The familiair, trustworthy and very much appreciated classic systainer is on the verge of extinction. It will be replaced by the new T-loc that is being introduced at this moment. Festool will begin this introduction with size I. All the newly ordered tools from now on, that are put in this size (e.g. PS 300 Trion&RTS 400 orbital sander), will be outfitted with the new T-loc. After this one the rest of the systainer sizes will follow in a sloping order.
Once all the new T-loc sizes have been introduced, Festool will no longer support the classic model and will cease to produce the classic systainers. Already at their homeground they no longer offer the empty size I systainer: At the German Festool website the classic systainer size I is no longer mentioned, only the T-loc is shown. As of from size II, the classical ones are still around on the site.
The new T-loc systainers have some great beneficial qualities that the old systainers don't; they lock all four corners with the switch of just one knob and you don't need to bruise your fingers opening the latches are just 2 of them.
On the downside however; if you just so happened to have a considerable stack of the classic systainers, you'll only be able to put the new T-loc on top of that stack, since they don't fit in the middle or on the bottom. It is impossible to put an old model on top of a new one.
[attachimg=#]
Festool has been selling their products as single parts of a system. The systainer is a significant attribute of the bigger whole and has certain characteristics that will make it fit into this system. When these characteristics are tampered with, the system will collapse.
[attachimg=#]
Festool no longer posesses the exclusive rights of the systainer. By making a great invention as such, they convinced other companies to copy their idea and team up into using the systainer. This obviously has numerous benefits for the consumer and (unintentionally) Festool enlarged their system towards those other companies:
Bessey
Bosch
DeWalt
Fein
Ironside
K?rcher
Knipex
Kofferfunshop
Metabo
Mohawk
Oneida
Panasonic
Prebena
Protool
This thread is therefore intended to open a discussion that might persuade Festool not to pronounce the classical systainers to be redundant. The least they could do is listen to some solid arguments.
Once all the new T-loc sizes have been introduced, Festool will no longer support the classic model and will cease to produce the classic systainers. Already at their homeground they no longer offer the empty size I systainer: At the German Festool website the classic systainer size I is no longer mentioned, only the T-loc is shown. As of from size II, the classical ones are still around on the site.
The new T-loc systainers have some great beneficial qualities that the old systainers don't; they lock all four corners with the switch of just one knob and you don't need to bruise your fingers opening the latches are just 2 of them.
On the downside however; if you just so happened to have a considerable stack of the classic systainers, you'll only be able to put the new T-loc on top of that stack, since they don't fit in the middle or on the bottom. It is impossible to put an old model on top of a new one.
[attachimg=#]
Festool has been selling their products as single parts of a system. The systainer is a significant attribute of the bigger whole and has certain characteristics that will make it fit into this system. When these characteristics are tampered with, the system will collapse.
[attachimg=#]
Festool no longer posesses the exclusive rights of the systainer. By making a great invention as such, they convinced other companies to copy their idea and team up into using the systainer. This obviously has numerous benefits for the consumer and (unintentionally) Festool enlarged their system towards those other companies:
Bessey
Bosch
DeWalt
Fein
Ironside
K?rcher
Knipex
Kofferfunshop
Metabo
Mohawk
Oneida
Panasonic
Prebena
Protool
This thread is therefore intended to open a discussion that might persuade Festool not to pronounce the classical systainers to be redundant. The least they could do is listen to some solid arguments.