Per Swenson said:
Qualifications,
What I know about glue's could fill a shot glass. (1/2 true)
I've got a lot less experience than you, and probably a lot less common sense as well. But one time I decided to see what would happen if I edge-glued two pieces of wood, like you'd do for a table top, but only coat one piece with glue. After a minute of two of clamping time, I took the clamps off and took the two pieces of wood apart. The amount of glue that was on the second piece of wood was surprisingly little, and it was not distributed very evenly. So ever since then, I've always followed Franklin's directions and coated both pieces.
Now I'll admit that I didn't do anything further, like re-doing the experiment, but allowing the joint to stay clamped until the glue was cured, and then testing it against another piece that was done the "orthodox" way. Maybe both would have been just as strong. Or maybe the experimental joint would have been "strong enough," even if it was not as strong as a typical glued joint. I've done a few other experiments with simple, butted glue joints, and I'm pretty amazed at the strength of today's white and yellow glues. Definitely stronger than I was taught 25 years ago, the first time I tried to learn woodworking.
I also have to wonder what would have happened if I had glued only one side, but then moistened the other side with a "wetting agent" (a dilute solution of dish soap and water). That might have increased the transfer of glue from one surface to the other. It would be really easy to do with Domino tenons, too--just put a little glue in the mortise, then quickly dip each tenon in a little cup of solution just before insertion. Yeah, it's extra work, but not much, and if it decreases the risk of joint failure and hydro-lock, then it might--
might--be worth it. Something tells me David Ronyak might be able to contribute a little expertise on this point...not to put him on the spot
Regards,
John