First: Peter, thank your wife for me as well. I also tasted her delicious chocolate concoction during class last week. I had no idea where they came from, but Minnie and Sedge seemed trustworthy enough, so I partook, and they were great.
Now, I'm probably going to get in trouble for this, but its 5:45am and I haven't been able to sleep since 3:30, AND I'm kind of like a lawyer in that some of my favorite discussions are the ones that have already been beaten to death (you have to begrudgingly admit the intelligence of lawyers to get us to pay them at an hourly rate to argue stuff that has already been beaten), BUT:
I have to agree with Rick on the whole stroboscopic affect, language terminology notwithstanding.
I read the counter-poster's added link (remember, it was 4am and I can't sleep), and the quote that he pulled is from a section specifically dealing with fire alarms. Its not likely that the fire alarm manufacturer is making fire alarms that pulse thousands of times per second, so the warning the site gives is just fine; i.e., keep it below 5Hz. But then the site goes on to say:
Generally, flashing lights most likely to trigger seizures are between the frequency of 5 to 30 flashes per second (Hertz).
Not being an expert in the field (or any other field, for that matter), I am going to presume that the farther away from the 5 to 30 range that you get, the more safe your strobe light is to those who suffer... and two orders of magnitude (i.e. not 30, nor 300, but 3000, or something like it) away is pretty darn far away.
To conclude, I think you are all fine gentlemen (and some of you are probably fine ladies), and I hope you aren't upset that I re-re-hijacked this thread.
PS. The Carvex is really cool, and I think it should be released, even if those four guys in North America who have really exacting standards are going to think its sub-par.