Catching the bad guys

Am I correct in saying that the rear bumper can withstand a harder hit than the front bumper?
Rear enders are not uncommon here as it can get pretty aggressive on the roads at times, and in shopping centres sometimes it's a free for all. So every car I've owned, and my missus and kids for that matter, have all had tow bars fitted. Just the sight of a towbar seems to be a decent visual deterrent from most people tailgating you as they know they'll definitely come off second best.
 
As long as we are on the subject of head in parking, I would add this note of caution.

Every once in a while, I will park “head-in” and be faced by another car that is already parked. When it is time to leave, sometimes that car will already be gone. It is often easier (and perceived safer) to drive through and exit where that car had previously been parked rather than backing out.

The risk is this: No one expects an empty parking space to suddenly be filled, and once filled, suddenly have a car drive out. So if you find yourself in that situation, be extremely careful, and come to a full stop before exiting the spot.

I am not sure who would have the liability if there was a fender bender, but I suspect that the once-parked-car leaving the spot would have at least some of the liability.

I have observed a couple of close calls like that. So keep that in mind.
 
Every once in a while, I will park “head-in” and be faced by another car that is already parked. When it is time to leave, sometimes that car will already be gone. It is often easier (and perceived safer) to drive through and exit where that car had previously been parked rather than backing out.
I thought the unwritten rule for parking in car spot rows was always back it in? ;-)
 
In the US we do the lazy thing first, which is to just pull into the spot, nose in. Copy always back in, I guess to enable quick departures if needed.
I do it on a case-by-case basis. If I know the aisle is busy, I'll take the effort to back in since that's usually safer than trying to back out later.
 
As long as we are on the subject of head in parking, I would add this note of caution.

Every once in a while, I will park “head-in” and be faced by another car that is already parked. When it is time to leave, sometimes that car will already be gone. It is often easier (and perceived safer) to drive through and exit where that car had previously been parked rather than backing out.

The risk is this: No one expects an empty parking space to suddenly be filled, and once filled, suddenly have a car drive out. So if you find yourself in that situation, be extremely careful, and come to a full stop before exiting the spot.

I am not sure who would have the liability if there was a fender bender, but I suspect that the once-parked-car leaving the spot would have at least some of the liability.

I have observed a couple of close calls like that. So keep that in mind.
Spot on advice- There is a local Panera Bread that sits beside a Starbucks, which has its own drive through lane like so many Starbucks that have enough space for one. They share a fairly large parking lot. No matter what time of the day, the 'lane cutting' that people are avoiding by heading OUT to the actual traveling lanes, is witnessed by all the 'drive-through the spots- driving that occurs. What's worse is the perceived "right of way" that these driver popping out of the spots seem to want to impose on the other drivers who are actually using the 'traffic' lanes for drive around the lot, looking for their space to pull into... :oops: :oops: :rolleyes::rolleyes:
It's probably the worst lot for this behavior around where either I work or live that I see in Chicago.
 
Spot on advice- There is a local Panera Bread that sits beside a Starbucks, which has its own drive through lane like so many Starbucks that have enough space for one. They share a fairly large parking lot. No matter what time of the day, the 'lane cutting' that people are avoiding by heading OUT to the actual traveling lanes, is witnessed by all the 'drive-through the spots- driving that occurs. What's worse is the perceived "right of way" that these driver popping out of the spots seem to want to impose on the other drivers who are actually using the 'traffic' lanes for drive around the lot, looking for their space to pull into... :oops: :oops: :rolleyes::rolleyes:
It's probably the worst lot for this behavior around where either I work or live that I see in Chicago.
Those drive thru lanes are another risk. People picking up their morning coffee advance a few feet to allow the next person on line to pick up their order. Sometimes (not often) the driver is doing some last minute organizing of his/her breakfast and coffee. And sometimes (not often) they start rolling out to the parking lot while doing that organizing. Sometimes (not often) this results in some near collisions. So it is (often) a good idea to pay close attention to those leaving the pickup window. If they are looking down instead of ahead, take care (always).
 
Gawd I can’t imagine putting these obstacles in my morning/ life…non attentive people ….I do enjoy my coffee (Starbucks-$15 a lb. -ground) brewed thru a nice Krupps machine probably a 1/4 of the going drive up rate ( …watching the nature on the lake until the shop warms up…..no cabin fever ..I like it here at home …I planned my surroundings and am happy not have to deal with all of that having to get out of the house for a cuppa but to each thier own
 
Since I own the same model, I’m really curious what exactly was damaged?
My 2019 Pacifica has auto start/stop. The auto start/stop has more excuses than a politician.

Engine temperature too low.
Cabin heating/cooling not ready
Battery charging

But this morning a yellow icon showed up on my screen, and a message flashed “AUTO START/STOP REQUIRES SERVICE”. I stopped by my mechanic and he said it was safe to drive, but the auto start/stop would not work (I routinely toggle it “off” when it starts to work).

It turns out this was a Packard-created issue. I added windshield washer solution and I did not fully close the hood. As soon as the hood was properly latched, the warning light went out.

It was a bit worrisome because when the car was 2 years old I got a notice to replace the auto start/stop battery. The battery plus programming fees came to just over $500.00. I’m pretty sure that someone up/down the supply chain made too much profit off of that service.
 
My 2019 Pacifica has auto start/stop. The auto start/stop has more excuses than a politician.

Engine temperature too low.
Cabin heating/cooling not ready
Battery charging

But this morning a yellow icon showed up on my screen, and a message flashed “AUTO START/STOP REQUIRES SERVICE”. I stopped by my mechanic and he said it was safe to drive, but the auto start/stop would not work (I routinely toggle it “off” when it starts to work).

It turns out this was a Packard-created issue. I added windshield washer solution and I did not fully close the hood. As soon as the hood was properly latched, the warning light went out.

It was a bit worrisome because when the car was 2 years old I got a notice to replace the auto start/stop battery. The battery plus programming fees came to just over $500.00. I’m pretty sure that someone up/down the supply chain made too much profit off of that service.
On my 2025 model the auto start is only available via an app, and also requires an annual payment of $149. I didn’t pay.
 
Last edited:
On my 2025 model the auto start is only available via an app, and also requires an annual payment of $149. I didn’t pay.
Auto start or auto stop only available via an app? If it's the auto start that's pretty crap on their part, if it's auto stop that's a bonus in my book!
 
When you are saying auto start stop this is the save gas at the traffic light by shutting down and then starting when you take you foot off the brake?

Peter
 
Auto start or auto stop only available via an app? If it's the auto start that's pretty crap on their part, if it's auto stop that's a bonus in my book!
Ha! I’m really messing up tonight. I’m thinking of “remote” start so, never mind.

On my car auto stop/start is on by default. I have to push a button every time the car is started to turn auto stop/start off. To me it’s only benefit is when I forget to disable it and it turns the car off, then I know the battery is well charged without having to go through the menus to search out it’s condition.
 
Ha! I’m really messing up tonight. I’m thinking of “remote” start so, never mind.

On my car auto stop/start is on by default. I have to push a button every time the car is started to turn auto stop/start off. To me it’s only benefit is when I forget to disable it and it turns the car off, then I know the battery is well charged without having to go through the menus to search out it’s condition.
I'm so glad my ute doesn't have auto stop. Our freeways can be incredibly sluggish at peak times so you're coasting a few feet then stopping. I've heard cars alongside me stopping/starting many dozens of times while just moving 20-30 metres!

Extrapolating that throughout the day and it's easily pushing several hundred cycles at a minimum, I really find it hard to believe there's no adverse impact.
 
Ha! I’m really messing up tonight. I’m thinking of “remote” start so, never mind.

On my car auto stop/start is on by default. I have to push a button every time the car is started to turn auto stop/start off. To me it’s only benefit is when I forget to disable it and it turns the car off, then I know the battery is well charged without having to go through the menus to search out it’s condition.
I also routinely toggle off the start/stop function the first time it cycles for the drive. That did not stop the original start/stop battery from dying after 2 years of ownership. There is a Chrysler Pacifica equivalent of FOG. I’m a member and it is a useful resource. There is an aftermarket way to turn off the start/stop without it toggling on the next time you use it.

It is free and useful, but I only visit when I have a question.

 
The reason I asked is that my 2022 Ram pickup that I rarely drive has the start stop. On one of the auto repair shows I watch on Youtube they were trouble shooting issues with a car and noted that sometimes all sorts of really weird issues pop up out of nowhere and are caused by a bad start stop battery. They went on to say that whenever they replaced the normal battery on a start stop equipped car they also automatically replace that battery too. I went to check my extended warranty from Ram and it is not covered although it does have am 8 year 80000 warranty on the battery. Just for kicks I looked up how much it would cost to replace that battery which is between the rear seat and the back of the cab and prices ranged in the $2000 to $3500 range. I only use the truck for longer trips and will time out on all my warranties versus exceeding mileage (currently 39 months old with 7900 miles), but if I decide to get another truck to replace it I will look for a vehicle not having that feature if possible.
 
The reason I asked is that my 2022 Ram pickup that I rarely drive has the start stop. On one of the auto repair shows I watch on Youtube they were trouble shooting issues with a car and noted that sometimes all sorts of really weird issues pop up out of nowhere and are caused by a bad start stop battery. They went on to say that whenever they replaced the normal battery on a start stop equipped car they also automatically replace that battery too. I went to check my extended warranty from Ram and it is not covered although it does have am 8 year 80000 warranty on the battery. Just for kicks I looked up how much it would cost to replace that battery which is between the rear seat and the back of the cab and prices ranged in the $2000 to $3500 range. I only use the truck for longer trips and will time out on all my warranties versus exceeding mileage (currently 39 months old with 7900 miles), but if I decide to get another truck to replace it I will look for a vehicle not having that feature if possible.
The only reason the start/stop feature exists is to help manufacturers achieve their CAFE ratings (Corporate Average Fuel Economy). But Trump has promised to eliminate those requirements, so if that happens, the Start/Stop feature will likely go the way of the hand crank to start your car.

 
Also, re: Chrysler Pacifica:

I learned at an inopportune time that the spare tire was an optional extra on the Pacifica. I never heard of such a thing. I recommend that you check the storage area for the spare and see if you have one.

Then decide if you want to get a new one. Amazon sells space-saver spares for the Pacifica. But the vendors are deliberately vague on whether it is a tire only or a tire/wheel combination. If your car did not come with the spare, then you will need a tire/wheel combination.

The salesman who sold me the car conveniently overlooked the fact that the car did not come with a spare. Perhaps he thought it might goose the sale.

If Chrysler is doing this, there is a possibility that other manufacturers are too. I recommend that if you car is 5 years old or newer, check for the existence of a spare.

Optionally, get an aerosol sealer/inflator for the car. I’ve never used one, but they have been selling them for years.

If you are in the Milwaukee battery system, they make a very nice air pump. Cheap enough if you already have a battery and charger. Pricey otherwise. Easier to use than a plug-in version.
 
Good move!
It might mean that station wagons (“estate cars”) will make a comeback.

SUVs are classified as “trucks” and do not factor in the CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) ratings. But if the CAFE ratings disappear, then car makers will start promoting station wagons over SUVs.

For 95% of SUV drivers, a different type of vehicle will better serve their needs (and do so more economically).

So another benefit of eliminating CAFE requirements.
 
Back
Top