CGI? I’m sure it is. But what is the giveaway?

Maybe.

Or maybe the budget wasn’t enough to support a paid actor and they would have used someone’s friend or do a different style of ad.
Any policy that reduces the total amount of acting work available will eventually and effectively reduce the income of actors. Can I substantiate it with data? No. But when UBER became available in NYC, the taxi income was reduced. It made the local news at the time. I see direct parallels.
 
Back
Top