jmbfestool said:
cliffp said:
Thanks for all the latest replies, you are all helping me a lot in my decision making. I sharpened up a blue handled stanley (6 years old vintage) and it dulled very quickly when I used it to cut a mortise. After this experience I don't want a soft chisel. On the other hand I don't want to wreck an expensive chisel cutting mortises. Are LN suitable for this operation using a mallet? (I have ordered a Thor nylon hammer following the recommendation of Paul Sellers). Or would the PM-V11 be a better choice for this? I may do as Woodguy suggests and get LN for intricate/less aggressive work and something cheaper but still reasonably hard for heavy duty chopping.
As a side note, do you guys use waterstones for sharpening or something quicker like a Tormek or Worksharp?
Yeah I would shy away from soft metal chisels and hard metal chisels that's my experiences ur best of with inbetween hardness. If you got for one extreme all does it do your head in lol that's what I have learnt lol.
Are you really talking about hardness? as in measured in the rockwell scale? I dont follow.
As a pointer for JMB, I believe your H&S chisels are M2 hss and yes they are diffucult to sharpen but they are tough, really tough.
If your edges chip then increase your bevel angle, 30-34 degrees for heavy chopping depending on the steel and the hardening process.
For chisels I would recomend plain carbon steel, but hss is sometimes needed if the chisels are used on hard and abrasive woods (teak, wenge...)
For beater chisels you cannot fault the narex chisels.
For chopping I like japanise chisels with simple high carbon steel blades (good ones, not cheap) and for paring I use japanese and blue spruce (a2) chisels.
The Lie-nielsen chisels are very good allround chisels, if I were to only have one set of chisels they would be the LNs.
The veritas chisels are also very good, O1 or PM-V11 but I dont like the handles as much as the lie-nielsens but thats a personal thing.