luvmytoolz said:
[member=61254]mino[/member] As I understand it from the Lamello Zeta point of view, the diamond coated is really more suited to man made materials than natural timber, and the carbide apart from being able to resharpen, will hold a sharper edge?
Yes, diamond (infused) blades shine in abrasion - i.e. cutting of the engineered materials.
When new, it would work fine, but the problem twofold: diamond itself is not very tough - unlike steel or even carbide - meaning that a sharp angle diamond edge will break off well before it gets abraded. Secondly, it is not actual single-crystal-diamond but a diamond-infused carbide. meanign the edge itself is actually weaker than the carbide is. With abrasion this is fine, as the "sticking" pieces of diamond is what does the abrasion. With cutting, this gets bad fast.
All this makes
sharp-angle diamond-infused materials not last very long.
But a blade cutting wood must be as sharp an angle as possible to cut the fibers, not abrade them .. hence the unsuitability in general cases for wood. There are way to mitigate this - e.g in a CNC the blade is more of an abrasion-action, if the blade is big-enough and can have negative rake, then it may work even with wood. But the point is "may work" is different to "is optimal". Then the thing is that a quality carbide blade for wood will last way longer than a blade made from same carbide cutting melamine ..
So even assuming diamond blade would not shatter the edge, it still lasts only about as long as two carbide wood blades that were sharpened 3-4 times. For a big shop, it can still make sense as one's saving on labor and downtime can make up for it. But the big advantage present with melamine cutting is no longer there.
stefano said:
so it just a question of durability than really performance, isn't it?
or should I image that for HPL and solid surface materials and Plastics in general it works better?
Yes and no. When a (quality) blade is new/sharp, it will cut as good as concentric it is. Basically how precisely it is made. As the blade dulls, the cut quality falls down. Especially with melamine and such, the blade is still cutting (abrading really) while it already does not make a perfect cut due to it being dull.
So over a lifetime of the diamond blade - courtesy of it lasting way longer - it generally will provide better *average* cut quality.
In practice, people solve this by having 3-4 blades in a re-sharpening cycle and using a fresh blade for the cuts that must be perfect while satisfying themselves with not-perfect cut edges where it is not necessary. So the "issue" become way less of an "issue" than may seem. One could even argue that having multiple carbide blades around instead of a single expensive diamond one is preferable for this reason - one may easily keep a fresh blade around for the cases where it is required. Once into a "big shop" territory, the optimum changes ..