Cheers for your kind words [emoji106]Untidy Shop said:Great work here, and attention to detail such as mitred corners. I know you and yours will enjoy this new addition for many years to come given the apparent quality of effort that you have put into this project.
Cheers for nice comments, ground was fine just after pouring all the concrete around 8 cube it rained solid for 3 days, so after i put 3 cube of ap40 + some sand to help soak it up. Piles/footings then bearers run across then joists horizontal so its solid & should stand a decent shake in chch. Kwila is the decking Australian timber and it bleeds terribly so needs time to settle before being coated, its just wetBirdhunter said:Very nice work!
Ground looks swampy. What did you do to keep the wood out of the water? Footings?
What type of wood did you use? How did you finish the wood?
CheersTinker said:A fine job as far as craftsmanship and a terrific finished appearance. You really paid attention to details in that respect. I think your choice of exposed lumber was a good one.
I see no signs that any of the framing was flashed to the house. No protection to base of any of the posts where contacted with earth.(and water) The grading should have been improved before posts were added or water will always be a problem. I don't have any suggestions for how to fix, so I can only hope that I am totally wrong here.
Tinker
Fair enough sorry mate I couldn't meet your high standards, different regulations in different countries i have learned & this is in new zealandDovetail65 said:This would never, ever pass inspection in the USA(not in the 5 states I have lived anyhow), not even a small chance. I am not sure if that's a good or bad thing.
It's gorgeous yeah, but I wouldn't build my deck that way. Building over 500 decks in my life and running a crew that built outdoor living structures for another 10 years I know a little about it.
I guess in Ireland things are different. It looks great and isn't going to fall down that's for sure, regretfully in the USA that's not enough.
And for most woodworkers in the USA that wood is more well know as Merbau, it's nice wood and I use it often. It is way harder than say White Oak and doesn't move that much either. That's an awful nice amount we can't really get in the US very easily. I know a guy in New Zealand that has it on his deck and other than making everything red(concrete etc) it's holding up very, very well.
Cealan said:Fair enough sorry mate I couldn't meet your high standards, different regulations in different countries i have learned & this is in new zealandDovetail65 said:This would never, ever pass inspection in the USA(not in the 5 states I have lived anyhow), not even a small chance. I am not sure if that's a good or bad thing.
It's gorgeous yeah, but I wouldn't build my deck that way. Building over 500 decks in my life and running a crew that built outdoor living structures for another 10 years I know a little about it.
I guess in Ireland things are different. It looks great and isn't going to fall down that's for sure, regretfully in the USA that's not enough.
And for most woodworkers in the USA that wood is more well know as Merbau, it's nice wood and I use it often. It is way harder than say White Oak and doesn't move that much either. That's an awful nice amount we can't really get in the US very easily. I know a guy in New Zealand that has it on his deck and other than making everything red(concrete etc) it's holding up very, very well.
You covered it all there, nice to hear from your experience, always interesting to get opinions. It rained a months rain in two days in those pictures so it looks worse than it is &after theres 8 cube of concrete in it & drains to the back with a rough fall with plenty of ap40 (4cube)I get what your saying & understand & it will definitely hold & take a decent earthquakeDovetail65 said:Cealan said:Fair enough sorry mate I couldn't meet your high standards, different regulations in different countries i have learned & this is in new zealandDovetail65 said:This would never, ever pass inspection in the USA(not in the 5 states I have lived anyhow), not even a small chance. I am not sure if that's a good or bad thing.
It's gorgeous yeah, but I wouldn't build my deck that way. Building over 500 decks in my life and running a crew that built outdoor living structures for another 10 years I know a little about it.
I guess in Ireland things are different. It looks great and isn't going to fall down that's for sure, regretfully in the USA that's not enough.
And for most woodworkers in the USA that wood is more well know as Merbau, it's nice wood and I use it often. It is way harder than say White Oak and doesn't move that much either. That's an awful nice amount we can't really get in the US very easily. I know a guy in New Zealand that has it on his deck and other than making everything red(concrete etc) it's holding up very, very well.
Not that they are only my standards at all, but general building practices we are taught and must adhere to in most places in the US. As I said this appear to be well built and in my estimation isn't ever going to fall down. I am not bad mouthing your carpentry, but the site preparation just isn't how we do it and after years of building decks what I now think is correct, take it or leave it. It's just my opinion and really has no bearing on the quality of your deck itself which appears very, very nice.
I almost didn't post I hate to say anything about anyone's work at all, especially when it look so good. But for the guys in the USA they need know to check with their county on whether or not they need the type site prep I am talking about. Most likely if it 32" or less tall(maybe some other height, 24" etc)they will need some type of gravel under the deck. With 50 states and some of them having upward of 100 plus counties that all can have their own set of standards it's worth a call. Many county building departments have booklets for homeowner building their own decks as well.
I can't see in the holes or trench from the pictures so I can not comment at all on whats holding up this free standing deck.
For what I can see and is my issue is the drainage underneath. Sand just doesn't work. Years of using sand has proven that much to me. Here in the US we would have to make sure that dirt grade under the deck could form no puddles, meaning flat and away from home even if ever so slightly as you do no have much room for a slant away from your home. Then gravel(in some places plastic under gravel is required), a number 5 stone or pea gravel to be place under and again sloped away from home. So then when a down pour happens there would be zero puddles.
This is an absolute requirement in most of the US and when our inspectors come out to check the depth pf the concrete footings(around here 42" in some states less deep, other places deeper) if they don't see the dirt graded flat and smooth and then the gravel the same they simply won't let us proceed with the build. And when we do frame before the inspectors get there they literally would make us remove the deck boards(if we got that far ahead) and crawl under the deck smooth the grade and hand dump gravel between the joists until it was right. Now as a youngster I thought what a crock and waste of time, but after years and years of seeing what happens to decks I absolutely see those inspectors were 100% correct in wanting this from us.
Now I live in a house where this was not done on about half the deck and another where there is stone and there was a huge difference in the appearance of the framing and deck boards where the pea gravel was used and was not used. It was night and day to the point the top of the deck boards themselves looked different and act different. No pea gravel, soft and spongy and grow mold within 12 months of being cleaned off. Where there is pea gravel the boards appeared much newer 20 years later, not spongy and no mold grows at all on them. And of course the framing where there is no pea gravel is even worse. The framing where pea gravel was used appears newer and this again is 20 years old, where there is no gravel the framing is going to have to be replaced(we are doing a huge inside our renovation now). This is all green treated material. I thought the deck was actually built at two different times, nope the original plans and permits prove it was all one job. Back then it seems gravel wasn't a requirement.
Other than this site preparation your work looks so very nice, the carpentry looks perfect to my eye. But as for the preparing of the site I am simply amazed that the difference could be so vastly different. We simply can't and IMHO should not build over dirt like that unless the deck is much higher off the ground.
Will any of this matter, probably not I have seen deck not nearly nice as your last 30 years before we knocked them down. It may add to you having to maintain your decking more though.
Birdhunter said:I am winching now thinking about my first deck compared to the OP's beautiful work.
I had never built anything big, the Internet had not yet been ""invented" by Al Gore, and I didn't have any help.
I knew that I needed footings and termite resistant wood.
I laid out the footings, mixed Sackcrete in a large bucket, and poured the footings. Somehow, I had mismeasured on two footings. I had to dig them out and pour two more. I can't remember how I got the wood to the house as my only car was an Austin Healey Sprite, a two-seater you wore rather than sat in.
The wood I could afford was red cedar. I don't remember surfacing it in any way so it must have arrived planed and ready to nail in. I do remember having to fight mightily with some of the warped boards to get them into place for nailing.
I don't think the deck would have met code even in Dog Patch inspected by a blind inspector. But, I enjoyed many an adult beverage on the deck over the next 5 years I lived there.
It was my first and last deck. The next deck was built by professionals. Their only mistake was building the deck with one of out cats inside the enclosed deck. That's another story.