Here's the deleted post from the other thread about festool rails compared to this system. I've never tried it, and wrote these comments after watching the product demo video. Apologies if you think the EZ is the best thing since sliced bread.
"I just watched this video for the ]EZ, and I'm not sure how these compare. I'm newly appreciative of safe working conditions now that I have Festool.
First of all, are you using this rail with Festool stuff? No dust extraction then (others will do it, but really, are they as good at that? One point Festool)
Second, in the product video the demonstrator didn't clamp the work down. Why? because there is no function with this to clamp the rail to the work that I saw. Let alone a dedicated table to cut on that holds most workpieces for crosscutting captive (The MFT is both of these and more. Point two, Festool)
Third, Did you notice how, having not clamped the rail to the work or the work to the table, he has to hold the offcut behind the saw's path? Somebody will lose a thumb someday. The way the stops are designed on this rail you must maintain pressure against the outside of the offcut to keep it accurate. He makes a point of that. That means every time you cut you automatically risk binding. Do other saws plunge? Some. Do other saws have a retractable riving knife to prevent kickback? I don't know of any. He also demonstrates that to finish the cut, you must reach in next to the blade and flick the guide away. Every cut. (I'm going to call that game in favor of Festool)
There are pages and pages of threads here on how to get square cuts on your MFT. At least four or five major tips I can think of (few of which I've actually used, I just tried real hard and set it square, then made a pencil mark on the top so I could reset it. I check it every so often. It's close enough for G jobs most of the time, and when it's really critical, I check it again.)
I wouldn't even put these things in the same class. I'm not taking away from anyone who uses them and loves them. Massive respect Grin to all workers and work methods. I just don't think it's a fair match."
"I just watched this video for the ]EZ, and I'm not sure how these compare. I'm newly appreciative of safe working conditions now that I have Festool.
First of all, are you using this rail with Festool stuff? No dust extraction then (others will do it, but really, are they as good at that? One point Festool)
Second, in the product video the demonstrator didn't clamp the work down. Why? because there is no function with this to clamp the rail to the work that I saw. Let alone a dedicated table to cut on that holds most workpieces for crosscutting captive (The MFT is both of these and more. Point two, Festool)
Third, Did you notice how, having not clamped the rail to the work or the work to the table, he has to hold the offcut behind the saw's path? Somebody will lose a thumb someday. The way the stops are designed on this rail you must maintain pressure against the outside of the offcut to keep it accurate. He makes a point of that. That means every time you cut you automatically risk binding. Do other saws plunge? Some. Do other saws have a retractable riving knife to prevent kickback? I don't know of any. He also demonstrates that to finish the cut, you must reach in next to the blade and flick the guide away. Every cut. (I'm going to call that game in favor of Festool)
There are pages and pages of threads here on how to get square cuts on your MFT. At least four or five major tips I can think of (few of which I've actually used, I just tried real hard and set it square, then made a pencil mark on the top so I could reset it. I check it every so often. It's close enough for G jobs most of the time, and when it's really critical, I check it again.)
I wouldn't even put these things in the same class. I'm not taking away from anyone who uses them and loves them. Massive respect Grin to all workers and work methods. I just don't think it's a fair match."