Reiska said:I found this quite funny:
Upscale said:Reiska said:I found this quite funny:
Actually, your world map is not representative of the real truth. I'm Canadian and almost always convert temperature and measurement in my head to Imperial values. That's what I grew up with and that's what I still use.
So please put an orange dot on your map somewhere in the Toronto area to represent me. :![]()
RL said:I use Fahrenheit but am perfectly comfortable in both systems.
There seems to be an insinuation that using Celsius is superior to Fahrenheit because most countries use it which is ridiculous. Is anyone seriously suggesting that it's easier telling the weather in Celsius because freezing is zero degrees instead of 32 degrees?
And I certainly wouldn't describe Fahrenheit as "archaic" when it is still widely used by millions of people. I guarantee most thermometers in England are still read in Fahrenheit- more people there still measure body temperature in Fahrenheit than in Celsius.
Frank Pellow said:RL said:I use Fahrenheit but am perfectly comfortable in both systems.
There seems to be an insinuation that using Celsius is superior to Fahrenheit because most countries use it which is ridiculous. Is anyone seriously suggesting that it's easier telling the weather in Celsius because freezing is zero degrees instead of 32 degrees?
And I certainly wouldn't describe Fahrenheit as "archaic" when it is still widely used by millions of people. I guarantee most thermometers in England are still read in Fahrenheit- more people there still measure body temperature in Fahrenheit than in Celsius.
Yes, I am seriously suggesting that. And another thing that makes more sense is water boiling at 100 rather than 212.
And I stick with my claim that Fahrenhei is archaic.
Kev said:232.77778 C doesn't have the same ring to it [blink]
Frank Pellow said:That's strange Upscale. I am 12 years older than you and Canadian and favour Celsius and Metric over the archaic systems that they replaced. I grew up with both systems but switched almost exclusively to Celsius/Metric about 1960.
Frank Pellow said:RL said:I use Fahrenheit but am perfectly comfortable in both systems.
There seems to be an insinuation that using Celsius is superior to Fahrenheit because most countries use it which is ridiculous. Is anyone seriously suggesting that it's easier telling the weather in Celsius because freezing is zero degrees instead of 32 degrees?
And I certainly wouldn't describe Fahrenheit as "archaic" when it is still widely used by millions of people. I guarantee most thermometers in England are still read in Fahrenheit- more people there still measure body temperature in Fahrenheit than in Celsius.
Yes, I am seriously suggesting that. And another thing that makes more sense is water boiling at 100 rather than 212.
And I stick with my claim that Fahrenhei is archaic.
mike68au said:I also find it funny..... and I also can't really understand why they are so resistant and stubborn to change.
Just because it's familiar doesn't mean it's the better way, it's just the familiar way. The sooner you go the better way the more familiar it will become.