Happy TKS 80 owners?

KevHarrington

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2016
Messages
11
There seems to be a lot of issues with this saw when you look online.

Seeing as online reviews tend to skew towards the negative (as most satisfied owners don't tend to comment) I'd love to see a show of hands of happy owners.

Apart from the serious issue with table flatness, have people been able to correct the other problems that have surfaced with fences, alignment, inserts etc?

I'm very close to pulling the trigger on a Mafell Erika but the Sawstop on the TKS is a major draw. But not if the saw itself is a lemon.

Maybe give a thumbs up or comment if you got a trouble-free saw

Thanks
Kevin
 
I like having ten fingers, so I like my TKS80. Any issues? Users report discrepancies in the order of half a millimeter. Half a mm is nothing in woodworking, so… no worries as far as I am concerned.
 
Agree with Bart.

I’m working on a 350kg beech bench here at the moment and the TKS is producing perfectly acceptable cuts every time.

I’ve used a few good jobsite saws in the past and a few cabinet saws from Wadkin and (older model) Record. 

The TKS 80 doesn’t disappoint.  Sawstop, no brainer for me.  I’d prefer to have that safety factor and accept that I need to know how to optimise my cutting operation (just a little) to have good accuracy.

 
Yep, and as far as that half a mil is a problem, use this trick: cut the part, flip it toward you and push it along the blade a second time. Problem solved. (Trick I saw on YouTube: Vitten - Korean furniture maker.)
 
I’ll add one more comment Kevin.  If you want this to prep parts for fine hand finishing for harps etc., it’ll do what you need.  It’s not a fine woodworking saw, but certainly good enough to handle stock prep for handwork, which is my approach.  And perfectly good enough for home DIY and homebuilding projects etc.
 
Bert Vanderveen said:
Yep, and as far as that half a mil is a problem, use this trick: cut the part, flip it toward you and push it along the blade a second time. Problem solved. (Trick I saw on YouTube: Vitten - Korean furniture maker.)

Speaking of Vitten - have you noticed the 'flip up' cross cut fence on his table saw? Have seen it on a few videos, from woodworkers in Korea.
 
Thanks for the replies.

All very encouraging. Half a mil is fine for woodworking in my opinion as well Bert. It's wood not metal after all.

You're quite right Paul, it is to produce harp parts that will generally have a swipe of a hand plane afterwards. Or at least a bit of sanding. It'll mainly be used for ripping long, thin, narrow tapered strips of hardwood using a tapering fixture against the fence.

I had the luxury of space in my last workshop and had a massive Griggio 3.2m panel saw and attached everything to the sliding table. This kept my fingers nice and safe and a long ways from the blade. But in my new workshop space is a premium and access is restricted, which is why I'm looking at the TKS80 and the Erika.
 
Also Paul, I'm glad to hear Wadkin in this conversation. I absolutely love those old beasts and have a few of them still. Getting my 1949 16" RD surface planer in to my new workshop was such a headache, but I couldn't part with it. Likewise arranging moving the Griggio panel saw kept me up at night.

In comparison the thought of single handedly carrying in a TKS80 or Erika to the new workshop, and being able to plug it in to a normal domestic socket, makes me giddy!

Kevin
 
I would be interested to know which saw you finally decided on as I am trying to make the same decision!.
 
Hi there Tazio,

I actually went for the Erika in the end. It's on it's way from Germany at the moment. I would have loved if the TKS 80 was suitable but there just seems to be so many quality control issues with it and the Erika has a bullet proof reputation.

It wasn't an easy decision, I have a lot of festool tools and really like them, but this machine seems to have issues. I also found a third party rail for the Erika where you can attach it to the side and use it as a mitre track and that sealed the deal.

Hope this helps. Good luck with your decision!
Kevin
 
Thanks Kevin yes I also have festool tools .. but I also have a lot of mafell too and I have to say the mafell quality partially as regards the track saw rails and jigsaw is far superior.
But I also have the kepex 120 which is great .. but yes this saw does have some issues which at the price is really not exceptable ..and lacks the pull function of course .
I also saw the in2tools rail which is available and of course allows the use of 3rd party items such as the hugely accurate incra mitres and will more easily allow sleds to be made to use with the saw so I am leaning as well towards the basic Erika package with MFA .
 
It looks like you are in pretty much the same situation I was in a few weeks ago. My head was wrecked trying to decide!  [laughing] 

I went for the basic machine with the MFA, and I'll add an In2tools rail to the lefthand side.

I have an Incra mitre gauge from a previous saw so the ability to use that was appealing. Also I do a lot of long thin rips in hardwoods so thinking a long panel with a long mitre bar and the longer In2tools rail would make a kind of ersatz panel saw without taking up the space a real panel saw does.

I really hope festool sorts out this saw. It's such a shame that the only way to get sawstop technology in Europe is in a dubious site saw, or else pay tens of thousands for a Format 4 panel saw.
 
Yes it looks like we are and like you I have gone around and around , but at the end of the day the tks may have saw stop but with good practise ,sleds ,and the pull function ect there Is no reason to have my fingers near the blade ..so for an experienced user as good as saw stop is , quality and accuracy become the overwhelming reason for purchase .
Like you I also have an incra mitre off my jessam router table .
So the basic package with mfa and the in2tools rail will also be the way to go for me .
 
KevHarrington said:
It looks like you are in pretty much the same situation I was in a few weeks ago. My head was wrecked trying to decide!  [laughing] 

I went for the basic machine with the MFA, and I'll add an In2tools rail to the lefthand side.

I have an Incra mitre gauge from a previous saw so the ability to use that was appealing. Also I do a lot of long thin rips in hardwoods so thinking a long panel with a long mitre bar and the longer In2tools rail would make a kind of ersatz panel saw without taking up the space a real panel saw does.

I really hope festool sorts out this saw. It's such a shame that the only way to get sawstop technology in Europe is in a dubious site saw, or else pay tens of thousands for a Format 4 panel saw.

When you get your Erika kev it would be good to know how you get on with it please ?
 
With respect gents, neither of you have used the TKS 80, so I think it's a bit premature to slate a saw based only on the musings of a limited few on the internet, or to label what is a good quality site saw as 'dubious'.

That's not an anti-mafell/pro-festool take on things, and it's not intended as personal criticism.  It's just looking objectively at the experience that's behind the sweeping statements being made and supported, without first hand experience of the tool in question.

I'll be glad to read of your experience Kevin with the Erika 85 as I can have confidence you'll be able to point out good and bad alike with it, as you clearly have much experience in working to fine tolerance with high end machinery.  Whatever you'll have to say about the 85 once you've put it to work yourself, I'd take for granted to be informed and fair opinion to promote.

I'd looked at it myself when weighing up the options, but ultimately decided that the sawstop feature was one I simply couldn't pass up on.  As part of making that buying decision, I knew I was buying a site saw, something that needs to be a jack-of-all-trades in a sense.  That naturally has to bring some level of compromise with regards my own expectations.

In the back of my mind, I'm also conscious that the comparisons of the Erika 85 with the TKS 80 are flawed from the outset.  Surely the CS 70 Precisio is the comparable Festool for the Erika 85, considering the form factor, sliding arbor etc.  Am I mistaken there?  The depth of cut alone isn't something that makes the Erika 85 and TKS 80 similar.  Does that make sense to others?
 
I believe you’re right Paul_HKI.
The CS 70 is rightfully a direct competitor to Mafell Erika feature to feature.

I’m curious about the protractor mechanics that was introduced with the TKS 80.
Does this with the wheels along the V profile work as a small slider? I haven’t checked the price, yet, but wonder if I shall order one to go with the CMS and CS 50 as a compact more versatile slider.
 
KevHarrington said:
Also Paul, I'm glad to hear Wadkin in this conversation.

I’ve got a Wadkin spindle moulder with a ring fence in my workshop. It was built in 1963 and still works as well as the day it left the factory. You need a forklift to move it, though  [sad]
 
Paul_HKI said:
With respect gents, neither of you have used the TKS 80, so I think it's a bit premature to slate a saw based only on the musings of a limited few on the internet, or to label what is a good quality site saw as 'dubious'.

That's not an anti-mafell/pro-festool take on things, and it's not intended as personal criticism.  It's just looking objectively at the experience that's behind the sweeping statements being made and supported, without first hand experience of the tool in question.

I'll be glad to read of your experience Kevin with the Erika 85 as I can have confidence you'll be able to point out good and bad alike with it, as you clearly have much experience in working to fine tolerance with high end machinery.  Whatever you'll have to say about the 85 once you've put it to work yourself, I'd take for granted to be informed and fair opinion to promote.

I'd looked at it myself when weighing up the options, but ultimately decided that the sawstop feature was one I simply couldn't pass up on.  As part of making that buying decision, I knew I was buying a site saw, something that needs to be a jack-of-all-trades in a sense.  That naturally has to bring some level of compromise with regards my own expectations.

In the back of my mind, I'm also conscious that the comparisons of the Erika 85 with the TKS 80 are flawed from the outset.  Surely the CS 70 Precisio is the comparable Festool for the Erika 85, considering the form factor, sliding arbor etc.  Am I mistaken there?  The depth of cut alone isn't something that makes the Erika 85 and TKS 80 similar.  Does that make sense to others?

Fair comments and certainly not trying to make this in anyway a mafell vs festool thing I use both !…… however I am sure we can all agree that both companies made a major oversight by not providing t slots in either tables which really is a pain ! with Erika users having to by 3rd party rails and festool users having to utilise the sliding table to be able to use sleds jigs ect ….
 
FestitaMakool said:
I’m curious about the protractor mechanics that was introduced with the TKS 80.
Does this with the wheels along the V profile work as a small slider? I haven’t checked the price, yet, but wonder if I shall order one to go with the CMS and CS 50 as a compact more versatile slider.

That's correct.  I haven't tried it in that configuration myself as I opted for the set version, but to my knowledge that's the way it's designed to be used, with a locking option for the clamp being used to secure it to the slider instead in my case.  The wheels on the protractor clamp are then redundant.

Tazio said:
Fair comments and certainly not trying to make this in anyway a mafell vs festool thing I use both !…… however I am sure we can all agree that both companies made a major oversight by not providing t slots in either tables which really is a pain ! with Erika users having to by 3rd party rails and festool users having to utilise the sliding table to be able to use sleds jigs ect ….

No worries - I know this is 'just' a discussion between some folks on the pros and cons as we each see it, and I mean no kind of confrontation in what I've written. 

Having looked at the construction of the TKS 80 table top in detail, it's clear to see how the addition of regular miter slots would be pretty much impossible/incompatible with the saws structure.  I think rather than an oversight, it's a design decision and one I can't completely fault either.  I can only imagine it's the same with the Erika saw, as the available fences, sleds and so on are likely to satisfy the requirements of the core market for such tools. 

With that said, on the TKS, the CS70 and also on the CS50 and CMS, it's still possible to build a simple crosscut sled that will straddle the outer vertical edges of the saw table frame, with or without using the possible facility of the v profiled upper surface of the frame rails.  There are a few pictures of such a sled on the internet.  Here's one example from Pinterest:

28c663f9bbf07810a81d434cd967bafb--woodworking-jigs-track.jpg


The construction of a more typical format sled is also a relatively straightforward task if that's preferable, for box joints or smaller parts etc.  While I haven't a clue what this particular gentleman is saying, the video is pretty self-explanatory, and you'll see that he has combined the use of the slider with additional registration/support of the right hand side in that v profiled top section of the saw frame.  This shows the CMS, but the other saws will work the same way due to using the same type of profiles in the build:



Nonetheless, with a slider equipped saw and an accurate protractor fence which can be easily fine-tuned/calibrated, such fixtures are probably not particularly needed by the majority of target customers when these particular saws are designed and brought to market.  It's good that solutions can be build around them anyway, but at least when looking at the TKS 80, I don't see a simple way for Festool to have integrated miter slots without requiring compromises in other areas when it comes to the structure of the saw.  I think it's likely the same with the 70/50 saws and almost certainly so for the CMS TS55/75 options, although I haven't looked at the former in any great detail and the latter is something I've never seen in person at any time. 

But I take your point.  It would be nice to be able to use more familiar ways of mounting sleds and jigs, all other things being equal.  Still, there are useable ways to achieve the aim of using a sled if that's important to the way you'd like to work with the tool.

 
Here's a further video showing a miter sled in use on a 70, running independently of the fitted slider, where both sides of the sled are registering in the v grooves.  The more I look, the more I can see some good options that would be relatively straightforward to build.
 
Back
Top