tjbnwi said:My price was to high. She saved herself about 8K from the stories we heard.
Tom
Let's reassess that savings after the do-over
tjbnwi said:My price was to high. She saved herself about 8K from the stories we heard.
Tom
duburban said:... buying the materials and placing them directly in the dumpster would be more environmentally friendly
Paul G said:tjbnwi said:My price was to high. She saved herself about 8K from the stories we heard.
Tom
Let's reassess that savings after the do-over
tjbnwi said:The redo is 10K.
Cheese said:‘‘Tis a shame because the install appears to be a nice one. Unfortunately this is how many start and how many end. Tragic that you spend your $$ and receive this as a result.
antss said:Cheese said:‘‘Tis a shame because the install appears to be a nice one. Unfortunately this is how many start and how many end. Tragic that you spend your $$ and receive this as a result.
Take a closer look, I can see that the field tile grout lines (horiz.) are not aligned in pics 1& 2.
In pic 3 the squares are not in the same plane as the rectangles above and below. That strip of squares also undulates something terrible, I don't even need a straight edge to tell. Hard to be certain from the pix, but I'll bet the corners are grouted also.
Though I must say the niches don't look half bad from here.
Naildrivingman said:It indeed is a sad state when consumers are blinded by cost or slippery talk or both. I have gone up against this type of "competition" too many times to count. Hopefully there can be some legal recourse to soften the blow. Unfortunately (at least in MN) there isn't enough statutory protection. Hopefully this will resolve itself quickly.
tjbnwi said:I hope she has no recourse, the law should not protect you from your own stupidity.
I’m guessing she’s not exactly a favorite relative of yours...tjbnwi said:Naildrivingman said:It indeed is a sad state when consumers are blinded by cost or slippery talk or both. I have gone up against this type of "competition" too many times to count. Hopefully there can be some legal recourse to soften the blow. Unfortunately (at least in MN) there isn't enough statutory protection. Hopefully this will resolve itself quickly.
I hope she has no recourse, the law should not protect you from your own stupidity.
The shower will be resolved mid next week.
Tom
jaguar36 said:Getting a quote that was $8k less than what was presumably already a discounted "Family rate" would set off all sorts of alarm bells with me.
Naildrivingman said:I’m guessing she’s not exactly a favorite relative of yours...tjbnwi said:Naildrivingman said:It indeed is a sad state when consumers are blinded by cost or slippery talk or both. I have gone up against this type of "competition" too many times to count. Hopefully there can be some legal recourse to soften the blow. Unfortunately (at least in MN) there isn't enough statutory protection. Hopefully this will resolve itself quickly.
I hope she has no recourse, the law should not protect you from your own stupidity.
The shower will be resolved mid next week.
Tom
tjbnwi said:I hope she has no recourse, the law should not protect you from your own stupidity.
Cheese said:tjbnwi said:I hope she has no recourse, the law should not protect you from your own stupidity.
I agree totally with that statement, however not every homeowner knows the poignant questions to ask a contractor and can understand what the repercussions that a faulty install may entail. Consider your SIL... had she asked the correct questions, assuming she knew what to ask the contractor in the first place, and had she been given honest answers by the contractor she hired...she may have never been in the situation she is in now.
Personally, I find it imperative to pursue the general contractor for damages because it’s not just a situation of butchering your SIL’s house but rather how many more houses will he bastardize in the future before he’s presented papers or has his license revoked.
What may be obvious to some of us is not necessarily obvious to others that just want to “take out the garbage and rake the leaves.”
[member=44099]Cheese[/member] illustrates exactly the point I made originally. This contractor should not be allowed to harm others. If your SIL specifically made spurious comments regarding your price (and the other company) as compared to the one she accepted, then she does own some responsibility in this failure. A truly informed person cannot legitimately compare proposal X to proposals X + 8000. I can understand how product selection makes up for some of the difference, but not anywhere near $8000.Cheese said:tjbnwi said:I hope she has no recourse, the law should not protect you from your own stupidity.
I agree totally with that statement, however not every homeowner knows the poignant questions to ask a contractor and can understand what the repercussions that a faulty install may entail. Consider your SIL... had she asked the correct questions, assuming she knew what to ask the contractor in the first place, and had she been given honest answers by the contractor she hired...she may have never been in the situation she is in now.
Personally, I find it imperative to pursue the general contractor for damages because it’s not just a situation of butchering your SIL’s house but rather how many more houses will he bastardize in the future before he’s presented papers or has his license revoked.
What may be obvious to some of us is not necessarily obvious to others that just want to “take out the garbage and rake the leaves.”
Naildrivingman said:I don’t believe most consumers truly understand what we understand.
Naildrivingman said:[member=44099]Cheese[/member] illustrates exactly the point I made originally. This contractor should not be allowed to harm others. If your SIL specifically made spurious comments regarding your price (and the other company) as compared to the one she accepted, then she does own some responsibility in this failure. A truly informed person cannot legitimately compare proposal X to proposals X + 8000. I can understand how product selection makes up for some of the difference, but not anywhere near $8000.Cheese said:tjbnwi said:I hope she has no recourse, the law should not protect you from your own stupidity.
I agree totally with that statement, however not every homeowner knows the poignant questions to ask a contractor and can understand what the repercussions that a faulty install may entail. Consider your SIL... had she asked the correct questions, assuming she knew what to ask the contractor in the first place, and had she been given honest answers by the contractor she hired...she may have never been in the situation she is in now.
Personally, I find it imperative to pursue the general contractor for damages because it’s not just a situation of butchering your SIL’s house but rather how many more houses will he bastardize in the future before he’s presented papers or has his license revoked.
What may be obvious to some of us is not necessarily obvious to others that just want to “take out the garbage and rake the leaves.”
If a person with no psychological issues walks onto the freeway at rush hour and expects not to get hurt, then he must shoulder the responsibility of his actions. Other than that, no one deserves to get hurt. We as contractors have a measure of responsibility to educate consumers about the pitfalls of “home improvement porn”. I don’t believe most consumers truly understand what we understand.
tjbnwi said:I missed cheese's licensing comment--he has no license with the AHJ, no insurance, no bond. They did not get a permit to do the work. All of which she knew.
She had my spec's, simple enough to hand anyone else the page and have them price LKQ.