HarveyWildes said:I've got a shop made router table/drawers/box enclosure with a 4" DC connection, and a Wonder Fence with a Rigid vacuum attached. Even when I'm routing next to the fence, some chips still get through straight along the fence in the direction of the cut. I might try the endcap trick. I just replaced the old Jessum Mast-R-Lift (not the II) with a new Incra lift that has clean sweep rings, so I'm hoping that will help some.
That aside, I've had a Makita router in the table for going on 15 years and never had trouble with overheating or bearing wear on the router. It's not running on a production schedule, but it's not running once a month for five minutes either.
HarveyWildes said:HarveyWildes said:I've got a shop made router table/drawers/box enclosure with a 4" DC connection, and a Wonder Fence with a Rigid vacuum attached. Even when I'm routing next to the fence, some chips still get through straight along the fence in the direction of the cut. I might try the endcap trick. I just replaced the old Jessum Mast-R-Lift (not the II) with a new Incra lift that has clean sweep rings, so I'm hoping that will help some.
That aside, I've had a Makita router in the table for going on 15 years and never had trouble with overheating or bearing wear on the router. It's not running on a production schedule, but it's not running once a month for five minutes either.
I just used the clean sweep rings for the first time. They did not totally eliminate chips getting through straight along the fence in the direction of the cut, but there was maybe a 75% improvement. The chips tend to escape during the initial cut, before wood covers the ring. I assume that is because there is a certain "escape velocity" for the chips, and the more enclosed the bit is, the higher the escape velocity needs to be to overcome the more concentrated flow of air into the ring. At any rate, it does improve the dust collection nicely, but doesn't eliminate the problem. The smaller the dust particles, the better the collection. I assume that the smaller particles don't have enough mass to go against the flow (so to speak), while the chips do.
grbmds said:[member=61231]HarveyWildes[/member] How effective the rings and Clean Sweep are depends on more than one factor, I found out. First, while you want to use the ring with the least clearance possible, sometimes using a ring with a larger opening will give better dust collection. Obviously the openings need to remain small enough to prevent the wood from getting caught on the opening edges or tilting into the opening. Second, your dust collection machine makes a difference. For example, I found I get better results using my cyclone dust collector and the full 4" port on the Clean Sweep than if I use my CT48 and narrow the opening down to fit the Festool hose. For rabbets and cuts close to the fence, using both the in-fence collection plus the below table collection eliminates some of the chips you get at first and probably some other chips during the cut (but then I have an Incra Wonder Fence that permits that). I really do get almost all the chips although you are correct that some escape at the front end of the cut. You can reduce that even by edging the wood into the cut which will give the air flow the opportunity to pull a smaller amount of chips and will get almost all of them (depends how important it is to you). I think the Clean Sweep (and, for that matter, any under table collection) is essential and greatly improves the collection compared to without under table collection.
[member=61231]HarveyWildes[/member] Sorry I wasn't clear. I just meant that when I start the cut very slowly, fewer chips escape.HarveyWildes said:grbmds said:[member=61231]HarveyWildes[/member] How effective the rings and Clean Sweep are depends on more than one factor, I found out. First, while you want to use the ring with the least clearance possible, sometimes using a ring with a larger opening will give better dust collection. Obviously the openings need to remain small enough to prevent the wood from getting caught on the opening edges or tilting into the opening. Second, your dust collection machine makes a difference. For example, I found I get better results using my cyclone dust collector and the full 4" port on the Clean Sweep than if I use my CT48 and narrow the opening down to fit the Festool hose. For rabbets and cuts close to the fence, using both the in-fence collection plus the below table collection eliminates some of the chips you get at first and probably some other chips during the cut (but then I have an Incra Wonder Fence that permits that). I really do get almost all the chips although you are correct that some escape at the front end of the cut. You can reduce that even by edging the wood into the cut which will give the air flow the opportunity to pull a smaller amount of chips and will get almost all of them (depends how important it is to you). I think the Clean Sweep (and, for that matter, any under table collection) is essential and greatly improves the collection compared to without under table collection.
Yep - that's my setup also, except I'm using a Rigid vacuum on the fence, and I pretty much agree on all points. On rabbets and other edging tasks, once I'm past the initial cut, the dust collection is nearly 100% and on grooves the chips do not pack into the groove like they used to.
But - not exactly sure what you mean by edging the wood into the cut. Could you elaborate?
Cochese said:The only issue I have with the Wonder Fence is when split, some dust escapes the top.
kono0014 said:Not sure it has been mentioned but another benefit of the Incra Cleansweep is the sound reduction. I have even thought about adding a couple pads of insulation on the inside of the box to even further reduce the sound but haven't got around to experimenting. VERY noticeable sound reduction as is though. I love mine and I will concur that the router never gets hot as the air moving past it is significant. No issues whatsoever.