Richard/RMW said:
[member=27782]Scorpion[/member] FWIW I suspect your end mills have the wrong geometry (don't know the technical terms) i.e. a spiral that is too "short" for foam, and perhaps the mill runs too slow compared to a CNC router. Here's a photo of my brand spankin' new, unused, foam cutting bit next to a bit meant for wood/composites:
[attachimg=1]
In your video the end mills don't seem to be getting much "slicing" action, which I did notice in other YT videos of foam cutting.
Thanks,
RMW
I'm going to split my response in two to simplify it.
I completely agree with your observation. The tool geometry isn't correct I suspect. First I'll cover what I used, then what I think I need.
Left to right - 3/8-inch ball and 3/16-inch mill which I use for aluminum and plastics, and the right is the up-cutting 1/4-inch bit for wood.
I have a lot of end mills but not a lot of different profiles within. I selected these three for my test for specific reasons. The up-cut has a specific end-cutting angle that draws the chips up. See how the opposing cutting edges on the tip make a slight V?
A regular profile tip is flat
I believe that portion of the tool grind is called the edge concavity angle in the pic below.
In hind sight, I don't think we want the foam to be pulled up as its being cut because the material removal would draw up and maybe push the surface foam out of the way causing what I experienced. However I notice yours is up-cutting so that theory is out.
The smallest end mill I wanted to try because it had normal chip removing properties and a slightly less helix angle more similar to your foam cutting bit. Not down cutting per-se, but not up-cutting.
My theory being the ball was that the radius of the ball would naturally lay the foam down as it was cutting because of the radius end. Seemed to work that way and worked the best.
Your end mills are so small it may be difficult to see but here's what I'm guessing the grind/profile is. The edge in the flute most likely has a more positive (simplified difference in pic below)
Radial rake and a more extreme radial cutting edge.
Both of which should effectively sheer, or pull the foam as it cuts, instead of push it out of the way. Your thought on RPM may have something to do with it. There's no way I could ever generate the equivalent surface speed as a router on my mill. Did the end mill you got come with recommended surface speed settings?