MFT3 longer profiles

jimwho

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
31
If in fact the primary reason for the anticipated MFT3 is due to the molds for the rails wearing out than I would like to see the longer rail profiles made even longer. The longer rail profile should be made to accept three (3) table tops instead of the current configuration. It just makes more sense that you would make them to accept three and at the same time come up with a simple add on leg solution for the middle. 

javascript:void(0);
 
I would agree completely!  If the new rails could accept an equal number of tops, it would facilitate making a larger MFT.

My bet [totally uninformed] is that the engineers at FesTool have already considered that and have it in the works.

I have wanted to make a slightly larger MFT that would fit into my shop and yet not add another MFT.  It would be very cool to be able to do that easily.
 
I would like that too.  The resulting table would be a nice match for the longer rail of the LR-32 Hole Drilling System.

Corwin
 
I agree with that.  The other thing I'd like to have is for the rail and fence mount mechanisms to be quick release.  That is, pull a lever and everything that sticks above the table surface pops off.  Snap it back on and it is ready to go and still square.
I want to make a large MFT to replace my current assembly table which is a little over 3'x6'.  I use the assembly table as a cutting table with a foam panel to size 4x8 sheet goods down with my larger rails.  One of the reasons I haven't made the step to make the larger MFT is that I can see switching between the foam top and using the MFT rails often (especially since larger table would make the cutting capacity of the MFT larger than my TS crosscut sled).  The hassle of removing the fence and rails, then reinstalling and resquaring makes that too much effort.  The only other place the large MFT would fit would be as the outfeed of my TS.  Same hassle there when I use the TS.  So, for now my MFT sits jammed in a corner as the bastard stepchild of my shop.  It gets pulled out occasionally, but it would be a staple (and the larger MFT would already be in place) if it was easier to reconfigure.  I often think about using the MFT for things then come up with a different way to do it so I won't have to hassle with the removal and reinstallation/resquaring of the fence and rail.  I estimate it takes around 3-5 minutes to do all that and I can often find a way to do something elsewhere with that amount of time.  Since my MFT spends a signficant percentage of it's time as junk storage, the time to get it out is even longer as I have to clean it off.  If Festool can hit under 30 seconds to remove and/or reinstall the fence/rail with no resquaring necessary, I might have to upgrade.  Otherwise, I will make some sort of larger "multi-function table", but I doubt it will contain much of the Festool hardware.  As it is, I'll probably fold up the MFT soon to make room for my new neander workbench.  We'll see if I wind up missing it.
 
  Now thats a wish list.  I set up my MFT to break down length on sheets that I've already ripped to width for cab parts.  I set stops on the miter rail for cuts using a ts 75 and a dado to locate a trapped top and bottom panels.  I wish the leg system for the MFT could be widened without cutting the cross supports.  Other than that I love my table.
 
I don't think you could make it much easier to take the fence and rail on and off. A pencil line for reference and the fence is easy to set square again. One thumbscrew for each end of the rail? Couldn't get much easier than that!
 
I would really appreciate some form of replacement mechanism for the swivel unit that would allow the rail to stay in the same position on the MFT, but raise and lower to allow me to move materials under and from the area under the rail more quickly and easily. EZ Smart's bridge comes to mind. Since the cut depth is minimal, it seems unnecessarily difficult to raise the rail end up so far and create a head-bonking hazard as it is now. Being able to leave the saw on the rail while changing material would speed things up, as well. I should note that I'm using mine on my FrankenMFT which is ~46" x ~80". I'm 5' 11" and I find it too high to swing that 54" rail up until it is balanced vertically.

Greg
 
While this doesn't have much to do with the length of the MFT extrusions, one solution to Greg's post above is to use a scrap board, say around 6" wide by 15" long, to hold the end of the Guide Rail up while you position your material.  I often do this with my 75" Rail stretched across two MFTs.  I keep this scrap on top of some Systainers/Sortainers that reside beneath my MFTs such that it is readily at hand -- lift the Rail up, grab the scrap board and stand it on top of the MFT's Profile just inside of the bracket, lower Rail and all will stay put while you position you workpiece.
 
Back
Top