Benjamin said:what I want most is lightness and ease to carry around a job site, so I'm curious if the the mini is a clear winner or if the midi has any thing special that
I'm missing?
Alex said:Benjamin said:what I want most is lightness and ease to carry around a job site, so I'm curious if the the mini is a clear winner or if the midi has any thing special that
I'm missing?
Really the only difference between the two is the container capacity, 10 L for the Mini vs 15 L for the Midi.
So if lightnes is your main concern, get the Mini. I have the Mini for the same reason, I want the smallest and lightest package to carry around, and the Mini fulfills that role perfectly.
Just be sure to get the newest model possible, with the higher suction.
Wuffles said:Lazy question, but as I am thinking the same thing I was wondering if the hose connections are the same? The 50mm outlet I mean.
Alex said:Wuffles said:Lazy question, but as I am thinking the same thing I was wondering if the hose connections are the same? The 50mm outlet I mean.
Yes, the hose connections are the same across all Festool vacs.
The Mini and Midi vacs have angled connectors instead of straight ones, and that is because their holes are on top instead of the front. But their hoses still fit all other vacs and vice versa.
woodie said:The difference in weight is less than half a pound (0.4 according to the website), and the Midi is only 2" taller. I can't imagine those difference having a major effect on portability. I think the extra 5 liters of capacity is well worth this difference in weight and height, of course that's just my opinion.
Alex said:woodie said:The difference in weight is less than half a pound (0.4 according to the website), and the Midi is only 2" taller. I can't imagine those difference having a major effect on portability. I think the extra 5 liters of capacity is well worth this difference in weight and height, of course that's just my opinion.
The empty weight difference is negligible. But when you're close to full the difference can be 6-7 kilos.
[size=11pt]RKA said:Alex said:woodie said:The difference in weight is less than half a pound (0.4 according to the website), and the Midi is only 2" taller. I can't imagine those difference having a major effect on portability. I think the extra 5 liters of capacity is well worth this difference in weight and height, of course that's just my opinion.
The empty weight difference is negligible. But when you're close to full the difference can be 6-7 kilos.
Precisely. I almost chose the midi thinking it's only a little more weight and slightly bigger, but the reality is if I need capacity, I'll use the other one. The main reason for wanting the smaller one is portability and I'm not planning on using it with a big chip producing tool. In all likelihood it would be a sander or a saw for a limited number of cuts. I'd rather have something smaller, lighter and more mobile. So it depends on your priorities. If portability is first, and capacity is a close second, the midi is probably the better choice, but if capacity is a distant second the mini may rule the day.
On a slightly different topic, but one the original poster may be concerned with, my only disappointment with the mini is the hose attaches near the back of the unit, but the swiveling wheels are near the front of the unit. So, if you're moving about and dragging the mini/midi behind you with a tug of the hose (say you're doing a final sweep of the floor after working), the wheels will eventually swivel right or left and the unit will stop rolling in your direction. You've gotta go back move it yourself. Manufacturers of canister vacuums have figured this out a long time ago (put the swiveling wheels near the hose attachment), but for the life of me I can't understand what the thought process here was? Am I missing something?