woodbutcherbower said:
On topic;
[member=61254]mino[/member] - Agreed. You forgot to mention the 'elephant in the room' though - the fact that 'Hallelujah !! Freedom from being tethered by cords !!!' is the rallying cry of the cordless brigade as they make their cordless saw cuts - whilst being tethered to their extractor by the equivalent of a 3.5m long/36mm-diameter firehose-sized 'cord' instead.
It might also be a bit more of an American thing with the fatter cords everywhere. Because half the voltage, double the current = 4x the copper to limit losses to the same.
woodbutcherbower said:
1 - Horrific initial purchase cost.
Most buyers use government subsidies for that. In some countries some battery cars are nearly free, especially for corporate buyers. Like you could deduct the expensive from taxable income twice...
woodbutcherbower said:
2 - Horrific depreciation.
As with any car?
woodbutcherbower said:
3 - Horrific insurance, repair and maintenance cost.
Yeah, because what we have seen a lot so far is electrification of the wankpanzer category. And of course because some brands act like Apple.
woodbutcherbower said:
Due to heavier weight and too high torque. The acceleration should have been limited as a requirement for any subsidy. That would have decreased the amount of "accidents" too.
woodbutcherbower said:
5 - Proven unreliability compared with ICE vehicles. Endless software glitches and more besides - the simplest of which can often completely disable the vehicle. Think of an underdeveloped, rushed-to-market Beta-test with a wheel bolted to each corner.
So like a PS400?
woodbutcherbower said:
6 - Pathetic charging infrastructure.
That probably highly depends on region. Where I live there are a ton of public charging stations in residential streets and anyone that can park on own ground just gets his own 11 kW 3-phase charger.
woodbutcherbower said:
7 - No likelihood of an improvement to #6 as a basic 4-bay charging station costs $750,000 and no investors are buying as there's no return on such a huge investment.
Really? Regional government over here just let commercial parties install chargers all over the place at zero cost to the government, regulated kWh prices and at the end of the not even that long term of the contract, ownership of all hardware reverts to the local governments.
woodbutcherbower said:
8 - A power source (battery) which costs $50-60,000 to replace when it wears out. As it inevitably will. How many people reading this have 5-year-old all-day-daily-use iPhones with 100% functional batteries?
That price is 3+ times higher than reality. Battery prices have come down a lot. Perhaps your figure is from quite a few years ago?
woodbutcherbower said:
9 - They don't work when it gets cold.
They do, but with reduced range. As any Lithium battery suffers in extreme cold and extreme heat.
woodbutcherbower said:
10 - You're screwed if you ever want to tow anything or go uphill. Your battery range just halved.
You can do regenerative braking on the downhill.
woodbutcherbower said:
11 - If you do tow, you'll need to unhitch your trailer and park it somewhere safe so you can get into a charging bay.
That depends on how you design the charging station. The trailer won't be a problem with some of those next to the highway here.
woodbutcherbower said:
12 - But all those bays are already full because there aren't enough of them. You'll need to wait around until one becomes free.
13 - By the time you've done that and charged, your 150-mile journey will already have taken 4 hours. Likely more.
14 - Now multiply that by the mileage you'd like to do for that special weekend away with your family. Say 300 miles each way in an ICE car - there and back on a tank. But even if your car is a small one with a small tank - a 3-minute gas station pump, and you're good to go again. In an EV - multiple charging stops (if you can find chargers), and a 30-40% minimum increase in your journey time featuring restless, hot, sweaty kids. You daren't turn on the AC because it kills another precious 10% of your remaining 30-mile range. Roadside burger or coffee stops whilst hanging around charging? It gets real old. Real quick.
Yeah that sounds a lot like range anxiety [tongue]. Of 99% households with two cars, one can be replaced by a battery car without any problem whatsoever.
woodbutcherbower said:
15 - Live in Alaska? Or the Appalachians? Or Montana? Or Colorado? Or New Mexico? Or anywhere else featuring massive, wide-open spaces with hundreds of miles between towns? Once again - you're screwed. I'm a Brit living in a country smaller than just one of your states and my knowledge of the geography of your wonderful country is limited (hence the wild 'Big Country' guesses above), but even here - a 58-million-inhabitants country hyped with so-called 'EV awareness', we only have around 5% of the necessary infrastructure to support a ridiculously-impossible 'All EV by 2030' Government mandate. An entire country less than the size of Texas. 5% infrastructure. Heaven help you guys.
What happened to the other 8 million? 58 million was in 2000? Assuming you live in the UK
woodbutcherbower said:
16 - What about trucks? And railroad locomotives? And airplanes? And bulldozers? And farm tractors? And cranes? And ships? And all the other zillion huge diesel, gas and aviation-fuel-powered machines which enable us to live the lives we live?
The German cars are brought to port by electric locomotives. The coal for the Ruhr area arrived by electric train from the port of Rotterdam.
woodbutcherbower said:
#17 - #132 = I'll let you do some basic research and figure it out. But I just specifically wanted to mention;
22 - What about the huge number of catastrophic Li-Ion EV fires? The ones the fire departments can't put out because of stratospheric burn temperatures and the likelihood of re-ignition - sometimes days later? And the full HAZMAT teams now needed at every EV fire because the runoff fire-department extinguishing water is now critically contaminated with toxic chemicals?
There's a reason why auto manufacturers have thousands of unsold EV's on their dealer lots, there's a reason why many of them have either drastically reduced (or totally halted) production altogether. There's a reason why early corporate adopters like Hertz are currently offloading 20,000 EV's because they're losing money on every rental. Buyers don't want them because they're unaffordable to the Ordinary Joe, and they're totally impractical apart from being a rich person's crazy-expensive golf cart to go to the mall and back in - all whilst feeling great about how you're saving the planet. Spoiler alert = you're not. Your battery raw materials have involved hundreds of thousands of tons of minerals being mined and processed, and the electricity you've used to charge it has probably come from somewhere like a coal-fired power station which belches out more toxic sludge every minute than a thousand Kenworth diesel trucks produce in a week, or maybe from a nuclear plant producing waste which takes 500 years to become non-radioactive, or maybe from a gas-fired plant using up all the fossil-fuel resources EV's are supposed to be saving.
They aren't selling because of lapsed subsidies. Whenever some subsidy scheme on EV's runs out, sales often drop 90%. As for the energy; the % of renewables is increasing at a rapid pace. There are more and more days NL can run completely on wind energy. You can get a dynamic contract here with negative energy prices (it follows the spot price). During Pentecost afternoon, the whole of northwest Europe except the UK [tongue] had negative prices for electricity.
There aren't 100.000s pounds of minerals mined for a car. I think you got 'soil moved' mixed up with 'minerals mines'.
woodbutcherbower said:
I don't want to come across as some kind of looney-tunes EV-hating evangelist, and I therefore won't go into the specifics of how I know all this (cue longest post in FOG history)........ but it's sufficient to say that as an environmentally-aware citizen of the world - I believed the glossy marketing BS, I believed I was truly doing a good thing, and I was foolishly sucked into the false hype. So I reached deep, deep into my pocket, and I tried it. An EV version of the same van I'd happily driven for the past 9 years. 18 months in - I've had to buy a new diesel van as well to earn a living, having already turned down at least $30,000 worth of work because I knew my van wouldn't get me there and back in a day and there were no chargers in the rural areas involved. I still haven't been able to sell the immaculate, as-new EV version - not even for half of its initial purchase cost. Only a year and a half in - and I'm more than $70,000 in the hole.
No thanks.
Kevin
Well yes, the problem of claimed 'fuel efficiency' being grossly better than actual becomes a bigger problem with EV than with ICE cars.
tkrfxrs said:
Will be very interesting to see how you feel about the 60 in a few months. My 55 was always underpowered, and I returned it under warranty as it would not even cut 1/2 inch plywood. Festool, as usual, blamed the electrical feed, the blade, etc. but said they had fixed it. I moved, and didn't use the saw for almost a year after it was returned, and when I did, it was as gutless as ever. I sent it in again, and they want 393 to fix a saw they didn't fix under warranty. This tool may well be a dud, so I would encourage you to get it looked at ASAP for the "slow wind" problem. My 90 dollar Ryobi rips through the same material without requiring a counseling session before hand. Now I'm stuck with miles of track rails and afraid to get the 75. I've got about everything else Festool, including the VAC SYS they shipped me the week they discontinued it. Sometimes companies, or great sports teams, or other organizations with strong brands become complacent, thinking their customers or fans will stay with them regardless of what they put out there. It may be time for a fresh taste test of the green Kool-Aid.
What blade?