mino
Member
Do you have the 32-tooth fine blade and/or the Panther for the HKC?neeleman said:My experiences with the thinner blades (1.8 mm) on the HKC 55:
CONS
- getting dull faster
- can be sharpened fewer times
- FS guide rail has to be realigned or renew
- blades are bending to easily when taking of small pieces or skew direction
PROS
- faster sawing
- less dust
- less battery drainage
- less tearout
- FSK rails are great
Despite the CONS on the blades it's still a nice saw and I use it everyday.
Shame that the old and new blades are not interchangeable between the TS/TSC/HK/HKC, also when used on guide rails.
Maybe Festool should design different spacers for every type of blade to align to the guide rail strip.
Can you measure the "disc" width ?
The 2.2mm blades are 2.2/1.6 so in theory an 1.8 would have to be super-thin as 1.8/1.2 to be "compatible" if used in same machine rail combo.
CMT makes super-thin blades which are 1.7/1.1 that would fit on a TS/TSC55 were it not for the riving knife being too thick for them. We use the 1.7/1.1 for ripping on our Lidl/Parkside tracksaw along with the Festool 2.2/1.6 ones and the have the exact same contact with the guard. We even use special aluminum-cutting blades which are 2.8/2.2.
As long as the different between the kerf and the disk width is the same, the only compatibility limitation is the width of the riving knife which tends to be optimized for specific kerf.