- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Messages
- 1,641
I'm running late, so I need to keep this short...sorry. You can go to the USPTO website and research the patent process.
The best thing to do is file a Provisional Patent Application (PPA) first. This doesn't have to have all of the complex language, but does require a description and drawing. There is an MS Word template for completing one at the USPTO website. Your PPA is never reviewed, and that is why it doesn't require the complex language and claims the full Patent Application (PA) requires. The PPA is simply a placeholder in the system for your full PA. The PPA gives you 1-year of protection without requiring the full search or other expense. It also allows you to legally state "Patent Pending". You can complete the PPA yourself, pay the small filing fee, and even file it on-line.
The best thing about the PPA is that when you approach a patent attorney to complete the full PA 12 months later, the cost will be much lower because a lot of the work is already complete, and they just need to fill in some details. The other benefit is that once you have the patent, your protection date is retroactive to the date your PPA was filed. This actually gives you an extra year of protection over just filing a PA without the PPA.
I think the only time your PPA is examined is to confirm that your PA is describing the same invention. Your PPA is not public and cannot be searched or reviewed by your competition. If they infringe on the claims later made in your PA, they will be accountable from the date your PPA was filed. That's a risky situation for them, so your level of protection is quite good.
A PA should not cost a fortune unless it is so complex that it requires a lot of time to author the specific claims. Contrary to popular belief, the patent search is not the big expense with a PA. Technically you don't even have to do a patent search because that is what the patent reviewer does (forgot the proper name for this USPTO job). That doesn't mean you shouldn't search (which you can do on your own at the USPTO website), because if you file a patent that infringes on an existing patent, your application will be rejected and cost more money to re-file, and you could lose all protection instead of just the infringing claim that shouldn't have been listed.
If you really want to minimize your cost, then complete the PPA as though it was a full PA, and then bring that document to your attorney and ask them how much will it cost to convert this into a full PA (use the wording "convert to PA"). If you've described your claims in a reasonable manner, then all they have to do is fix the wording and language. On the other hand, if you find an attorney that tells you it's a flat-fee for a PA regardless of what work you have already completed (like the ads on TV) then walk away and find a reputable attorney.
The best thing to do is file a Provisional Patent Application (PPA) first. This doesn't have to have all of the complex language, but does require a description and drawing. There is an MS Word template for completing one at the USPTO website. Your PPA is never reviewed, and that is why it doesn't require the complex language and claims the full Patent Application (PA) requires. The PPA is simply a placeholder in the system for your full PA. The PPA gives you 1-year of protection without requiring the full search or other expense. It also allows you to legally state "Patent Pending". You can complete the PPA yourself, pay the small filing fee, and even file it on-line.
The best thing about the PPA is that when you approach a patent attorney to complete the full PA 12 months later, the cost will be much lower because a lot of the work is already complete, and they just need to fill in some details. The other benefit is that once you have the patent, your protection date is retroactive to the date your PPA was filed. This actually gives you an extra year of protection over just filing a PA without the PPA.
I think the only time your PPA is examined is to confirm that your PA is describing the same invention. Your PPA is not public and cannot be searched or reviewed by your competition. If they infringe on the claims later made in your PA, they will be accountable from the date your PPA was filed. That's a risky situation for them, so your level of protection is quite good.
A PA should not cost a fortune unless it is so complex that it requires a lot of time to author the specific claims. Contrary to popular belief, the patent search is not the big expense with a PA. Technically you don't even have to do a patent search because that is what the patent reviewer does (forgot the proper name for this USPTO job). That doesn't mean you shouldn't search (which you can do on your own at the USPTO website), because if you file a patent that infringes on an existing patent, your application will be rejected and cost more money to re-file, and you could lose all protection instead of just the infringing claim that shouldn't have been listed.
If you really want to minimize your cost, then complete the PPA as though it was a full PA, and then bring that document to your attorney and ask them how much will it cost to convert this into a full PA (use the wording "convert to PA"). If you've described your claims in a reasonable manner, then all they have to do is fix the wording and language. On the other hand, if you find an attorney that tells you it's a flat-fee for a PA regardless of what work you have already completed (like the ads on TV) then walk away and find a reputable attorney.