Wow, some great additional input....
Qwas, you are showing the general premise of what I had in mind, except I want a bit more accurate measuring and squaring system. The LR32 components are square enough when working close to the rail, but when 24" from from the rail attachment, prob. not the ideal attachments... as errors magnify over length. Also, relatively crude measurements, vs. what Corwin brewed up
Carroll, maintaining the measured piece under the rail eliminates the need to account for blade kerf, I understand...but if you are drawing a line (or setting to a "V" mark), there is still the accuracy issue of setting the rail to those marks... I have found that to be the only real cumbersone part of using the 118" rail. Tweak one side, the other side moves, chk left, chk rt, chk lft, etc. This was part of the motivation for coming up with an accurate and square two piece measuring system, which you set before placing over sheets, then place on sheet edge, and fit the other side into rail, or butt against splinter guard (if I use that side as the measured piece)... fast, easy, accurate..... with NO measuring, NO marking the sheets, NO setting the rail to the marks...
Now, maybe I have been very lucky up till now, and have not experienced any tear-out, if I did, it would alter my thinking a bit... (as to which side to measure from) but as you correctly point out, if tear out is an issue, after the cut, you would need to re cut the same edge to get a splinter free starting edge for the next piece. This would be quite a PITA IMO... I rather keep fresh blades in the saw, assuming that is what has been given me clean edges.
As you mentioned, with a sharp blade and a clean lower sacrifical piece (I use dense 2" polystyrene sheets), I have yet to experience any tear-out problems. Kudos to the Festool system for such clean edges... this IMO is one of the most impressive aspects of the TS rail system.
So, how many people experience tear-out? If so, with what type material?