SawStop/ Active Injury Mitigation technology to NOT be required

Between thread title and “CPSC reverses course” you pretty much got it without the commentary
 
Sounds like to be good news to SawStop. There's no pressure for other table saw manufacturers to come with a competitive finger-saving product.
:LOL:
 
@Mini Me The safety commission in the US was planning to mandate the Saw Stop technology for all table saws, but it looks like they've now changed that decision. Saw stop was going to release their patents to the public if it did become mandatory.
 
There's no pressure for other table saw manufacturers to come with a competitive finger-saving product.

I don't agree with that.
There is competitive pressure.
When I watch a woodworking Youtube video, there is a good chance the guy is using a Sawstop. They are selling a lot of saws.

The Felder PCS system is better, but bigger and more expensive, and Felder only makes high end saws. Not sure how interested they are in economizing their system to be practical in mid level saws.
Bosch has a similar system. But Sawstop says it infringes on their patent. So Bosch engineers need to go back to the drawing board to avoid patent infringement.
 
That was just a tongue-in-cheek remark. The SawStop has always been a divisive/political topic even after so many years and even after the ownership has changed hands. We can use some humor.

Your fingers, your call!

That said, SawStop has no urgency to give away any patents free that it may or may not have planned to do.
 
Sawstop was going to release one patent; not the portfolio. Other manufacturers claimed they could still not produce a saw based on the other patents.

I'm a bit disappointed in the ruling, because I was hoping that other manufacturers would be motivated to enter this market. I have a Sawstop cabinet saw; but my job site saw is the compact Dewalt. I don't use the jobsite one that often, but on the next big job if a saw with AIM was available for $500 or so I would probably just get one.
 
Back
Top