Shaper or router table

buckmaidt

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
37
With the release of the CMS, I am now torn between the 2.  Is there a place where on is better than the other?  My operations will mainly be cope and stick (rail and stile) but there will always be the occasional edge shaping ect.
 
I would go with a router table
They are just fine for what you want to do.Lots of different bits and many places to get them.
Shapers are more for production work and/or large cutters.Cutter heads are more expensive and not avaible just anywhere.
 
allthow the 2 set ups apear very similar they do two different jobs.
its like comparing a farrari and a land rover. on a track the farrari would be better but off road the 4 x 4 would easily work better than the farrari
the routertable and spindal moulder are like that . one is great at one job but not the other.
ideally you would want both

i would start with a router table because it will do everything  some jobs great some ok . the spindal moulder will only do some types of jobs and be great doing it but fail miserably at others.
 
Cutting the end grain half of the cope and stick in woods like oak is going to be very difficult with a router.  I have multiple routers and a shaper but,  I suggest you decide on how much of this work your going to do before investing in a shaper.

Jack
 
I should explain my situation better. One man shop mainly producing euro cabs with carcasses from melamine. Produce my own doors and drawer fronts as well as end panels, but I work out of a 600 sf building so space is a valuable commodity.  This is a one man one kitchen at a time shop doing own installs. Currently using a homemade router table but really looking to upgrade.
 
One other thing to consider is that while a high end router table may cost roughly the same as a shaper - tooling for a shaper is very much more expensive. 
 
buckmaidt said:
With the release of the CMS, I am now torn between the 2.   Is there a place where on is better than the other?  My operations will mainly be cope and stick (rail and stile) but there will always be the occasional edge shaping ect.

I had a Jessem setup with the remote 3.5 HP Milwaukee router, the total package was around $1800.00. I went to a Felder F700Z shaper. The shaper has a tilting head, sliding table and replaceable spindles. I got the router spindle to run 1/2 bits. Currently with the tooling and accessories I've got about $15000.00 invested with more to come. It an expensive investment but it can do a lot more then any router table with the same footprint and opens up more avenues of work. It depends on what you want to invest in your business.

John

 
junk said:
buckmaidt said:
With the release of the CMS, I am now torn between the 2.   Is there a place where on is better than the other?  My operations will mainly be cope and stick (rail and stile) but there will always be the occasional edge shaping ect.

I went to a Felder F700Z shaper. The shaper has a tilting head, sliding table and replaceable spindles. I got the router spindle to run 1/2 bits.

John:
That set up sounds sweet. Good to hear things are going well.
Tim
 
Hey Tim

Poverty is wonderful and things are going OK. I've had the shaper just over a year now and while the router table worked good, once you cross over to 30mm/1 1/4" insert shaper  tooling you don't want to use anything else. Setup time is about the same. I'll try and get a hold of you for coffee next visit to Oakville.

John
 
Back
Top