I prefer thicker and stiffer blades with solid wood, personal preference.Jason White said:Why not?petar73 said:Ts60 has 1.8mm blade and I would not choose it over ts75 for solid wood.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I prefer thicker and stiffer blades with solid wood, personal preference.Jason White said:Why not?petar73 said:Ts60 has 1.8mm blade and I would not choose it over ts75 for solid wood.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ScoFF said:It also has a thinner blade so more power and less kerf waste.
If someone says a TS60 doesn't have the depth capacity (62mm) to cut an average wood slab that's a deal breaker for me. That's 13mm difference. Over a cm.
serge0n said:That was my dilemma as well and I have decided to keep TS55 and TS75.
I upgraded my older TSC55 to use new 1.8 mm blades, so now the saw matches in "power" to the newest K version. I put power in quotes because essentially both saws have the same motor, same speed and same torque. The only difference is blade thickness. But I digress.
ScoFF said:serge0n said:That was my dilemma as well and I have decided to keep TS55 and TS75.
I upgraded my older TSC55 to use new 1.8 mm blades, so now the saw matches in "power" to the newest K version. I put power in quotes because essentially both saws have the same motor, same speed and same torque. The only difference is blade thickness. But I digress.
Very helpful answer. I think I’ll keep the ts75 and keep the 55req unless I come into some play money then I’ll sell the 55 and get the 60 if I think I need it.
How did you upgrade your 55 to thin kerf? Does your saw have a full kerf roving knife that wouldnt match the thin kerf blade ?
serge0n said:[...]
Using HK rails with TS60 seems to be awkward, the saw is heavier and bulkier than an HK saw. Sure, it's a nice feature, but how often would you use it instead of using a miter saw or your PCS with a miter gauge?
ScoFF said:jobsworth said:it depends if what you got does what you need why buy something else.
But then you can sell your existing saws and buy the new one, maybe have money left over for a blade ot 2.
Also depends if your one of those guys that have to have the latest and greatest.
I would say I can sell both saws (without rails), keep my rails, it will pay off the TS60 and possibly the set with a 55" track, I might have to kick in the tax.
I don't need the lighter TS55 being lighter and more handy, it's just a nice to have. I wouldn't mind condensing the two large systainer tools to 1. I'd like a single large capacity saw capable of cutting the max of what a tracksaw can do so 75mm but 60 might be close enough, not sure. If I ever slice a live edge slab in half I'll definitely be using a track saw and not sure if the 60mm would be enough or I should keep the TS75 for that. That's what I'm wondering. It also has a thinner blade so more power and less kerf waste.
Also, the TS60 can go on the FSK rails, if I ever want that functionality.
If someone says a TS60 doesn't have the depth capacity (62mm) to cut an average wood slab that's a deal breaker for me. That's 13mm difference. Over a cm.
ScoFF said:I probably did a spontaneous and unwise decision. I got the TS55 feq and rail set from the recon site and put my 55 req up for sale locally. And I’m keeping my ts75 for when I need depth.
I know I could have just probably modded my req to accept thin kerf but I thought the mod plus the new blades might be similar to what my recon price would be after my sale plus I needed a 55” rail. At least now I’ll have a more upgraded saw with the feq tag.