dpawson said:
Dear Festool
As a leader in machine tools, how about setting a standard?
So many different (and misunderstood) sizes in exhaust ports,
PIck ( < 3) sizes, internal and external specified and talk to your 'competitors' (who are NOT) in this field.
Then make your customers smile?
Honestly, it's not that hard. [wink]
I think you are misunderstanding what type of a "leader" Festool is. Certainly not a volume leader even in the professional market.
A (high end part of) the high end market manufacturers like Festool do not have the market power to set any "standards" by the sheer lack of a market power.
The only ones which happen to be "set" is when a certain pioneering design (think Systainers or the long-running FS/FS2 track series) becomes so ubiquitous that after patents expire the other manufacturers decide to make literal clones even with same sizing to be able to "lure" the high end maker's customer on price grounds.
That said, I believe Festool does a
very good job of setting internal standards and sticking to them for decades. That on itself is no small feat. I am sure a pile of compromises must be made when a new tool is being designed so it can fit "into the system". Some maybe even deal-breaking. That "system" is a core part of the Festool "product" as it increases the design and eventually manufacturing costs but provides long term cost efficiencies to the customers.
There is no commercial advantage from Festool trying to "impose" or push the industry to use Festool standard sizes. They cannot prevent others to make compatible equipment, sure, but there is no business sense pushing intrinsically cheaper manufacturers to get someone like Festool you out of business by making their cheaper kit compatible...
Besides, the Makita range is mostly make compatible as much as it can. Making a "compatible but cheaper" version of many of the initially Festool tool as well as accessory designs where they see the mass-market for them.