ear3
Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2014
- Messages
- 4,342
[member=44099]Cheese[/member] Thanks. Was there a big difference in terms of performance as well? I know the 735 has two speeds, but I've never really thought the single speed on the 734 compromised its performance. I've surfaced all manner of hardwoods on it by this point, and with one or two exceptions never got any tear-out. And since I sand everything afterwards I don't really need the "glass-finish" promised in the 735 specs on the slow speed.
Cheese said:Edward A Reno III said:I think I asked once before on a previous thread the differences between the Dewalt 734 and 735, and got mixed responses, but the overall consensus was that the 735 wasn't "that" much better than the 734. But some of the comments here, and certainly the magazine review, suggests that it is?
Edward,
I owned the Dewalt 733 which is basically an earlier version of the 734. I've owned the 735 for the last 10-12 years. There is no comparison between the 733/734 and the 735. Two completely different tools. Think moped vs motorcycle. The 733 was kind of toy-like, being made from fabricated sheet metal and the manual carriage lock was always an issue. The 735 is very well built and a solid performer.
However, when I owned the 733, I'd move it from job to job if I needed it because it wasn't that much trouble. I've yet to move the 735 from out of the basement. It may be only 12# heavier, but it is just too bulky/heavy/clumsy for one person to move, especially up and down stairs.