ChuckS said:
Chris Wong said:
I believe that SawStop does not recommend thin-kerf blades also because the less sturdy blade won’t stop as fast (it will tend to crumple) if the brake is activated.
As a result of Chris's reminder (and after checking with SawStop Canada again), I gave up the idea of looking for a thin-kerf blade for use with my SawStop PCS table saw. I'll try to get a WWII 20 T blade if I have lots of 2-1/2" stock or thicker to handle (I already have the WWII 30 T).
Thin kerf is fine as long as it is not thinner than 3/32" or 0.093. [member=57948]ChuckS[/member] I saw the blade in your recent post and if I remember correctly, I believe the issue was with the design of the shoulders, not that it was thin kerf. I wouldn't give up on finding a thin kerf blade.
This blade may be more expensive, but I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work. It's within the SawStop spec ranges and doesn't have shoulders like other blade. If your material is binding when using a thin kerf blade, the shim will fix that problem without having to resort to a thinner riving knife (or adjusting the position of the riving knife as
Trent Davis discusses.
Anyway, I reached out to SawStop USA a few days ago and this is the response I received on 3/9/22:
And the relevant section of the document he included:
Blade specs are stamped on all riving knives:
I guess it's possible that my .062
blade body could potentially have warping issues upon brake activation but most thin kerfs are not this thin.
I don't think thin kerfs should be avoided for the 1.75HP saws. Users just need to do some calibration when switching between thin and standard kerf blades.
If I'm way out of line in these suggestions, let me know why. Thanks!
[cool]