mino
Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 1,984
Taken.ChuckM said:CONTEXT!!!
I was referring to Beaver Tools which is still in existence: if it had refused to deliver, its sales link should be removed, too.
I don't know if Timtools' business is still in existence, and whether he has refused to do anything or not; I only know from the posts exchanged here that he is nowhere to be heard from (for whatever reason). Note all my posts above: I never mentioned anything about refusal on the part of Timtools. [blink]
The trigger was ".. the ongoing honey trap .." hence switching from a (non-raised) allegation of a crime into a confirmed crime narrative. That is a common technique in media when mob rule is sought so I am very attentive to that, to the excess so in this case.
I still stand by my note/message though.
This whole thread was carried in the "confirming a crime which was not even alleged to begin" direction. I see these "shortcuts" becoming a standard modus operandi in the US/CA/UK media lately and I see that as a very very bad thing. People get their lives destroyed this way.
Fully agree there.Alex said:Not sure what that means exactly, but it is a pretty big flaw to take people's money and not deliver.
...
But I tend to put a huge non-equal sign between -active- malice and an -inaction- be it for one reason or other. Accused lack of management skills or any other ability like computer literacy included.
I see as -active- malice when one -knows of- a problem -can- solve it and -decides- not to. That plus creating a problem intentionally.
One should give the benefit of the doubt so can enjoy one when One inevitably fails to fulfill someone else's expectation.