Simo_Petar said:Gregor - I've done some tests checking the advice offered.
I also did, this is coming freshly from my cellar:
When you measure the middle of the left side green slide strip to the black anti-slip on the bottom you should have a tad over 5mm, while in use the top of the green strips should be 5mm above the workpiece.It's a Festool 1400 rail I use. Out of interest I measured the thickness of the rail at the splinterguard edge, mine came out at around 4.3mm.
The saw should exclusively ride on the two green strips, as it seems it's best to apply downward pressure on the saw between the left strip and the rail (on which the saw sits on with the groove in the baseplate).
I was able to reproduce you issue on a 45° cut (not binding as I used MDF for the test, but a visibly unclean cut) when I handled the saw mainly with the right hand (at the handle with the power switch) and applied downward (as in toward the floor, not toward the bottom of the blade) pressure there.
In general applying more force than needed to hold the saw in position seems to lead to less good results.
The issue went away when I used the right hand to only hold the saw power switch and the blade at the plunge depth but used the left hand fingers on the baseplate (center of pressure roughly over the channel in the baseplate) to hold the saw down (so it won't tilt) and move it along the rail.
I was also able to reproduce the issue with the offset (minus binding and burns) even with that technique by setting the rail onto an already existing edge (instead of doing the 90°, taking the saw off and setting it to 45°, then doing the bevel), this went away after I peeled off the splinter guard, reattached it ~1mm outward and freshly cut it in with the saw in 90°.
Before a fresh 90° kerf was tight at the splinter guard edge, afterwards the splinter guard side was perfectly flush with the left wall of the kerf. The issue with kerf positioning on 45° bevels also improved greatly afterwards. Seems that there is a reason for the splinter guards being rated as a consumeable (instead of just being a replacement part in case you accidently rip it off or something).
All in all, flushly aligning the renewed splinter guard on an existing 90° edge and then doing a 45° bevel (while holding down the saw at the baseplate only) I managed to be left with a 90° 'problem' leftover (on the top of the workpiece) that was just 1/10mm or less - I can live with this as a safety feature so I won't cut myself on the resulting sharp edge...
Yes, I also read that. Idea behind is seems to be that the good side of the cut will only make contact with the front of the blade.I also checked the blade position after a full length cut and the front was tight to the edge of the workpiece. The rear of the blade was away by about a paper thickness. I've read in the manual that's a good amount.
In case the back of the blade is a bit out at 90° it shouldn't be able to be in (compared to the front) when the saw is tilted for a bevel.Measuring the blade position after a 45 degree cut was harder to verify, but I think that it was tight at the front and almost scraping the cut surface at the back of the blade. That might account for some of my burn marks I think.