Brice Burrell
Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 7,385
This is why I asked if you were done with this discussion. I thought some of the members would not be satisfied with the concession already made by the reviewers. My concern is these people may never be satisfied until they push out all of the sponsored reviews (and reviewers). BTW, that's what is going to happen if it is made difficult or not possible to post our work and or ideas here, we will be forced to find a more supportive place to share our efforts. Think about if that is what you want.
I agree with Greg's comment "this statement (Wayne's signature line recommendation) will trigger the assumption that the review is biased." Furthermore, the sig line follows the member throughout the entire site, potentially triggering bias with ever post the member makes. That simply isn't fair. Maybe you think it is, maybe you feel every post is already biased. I don't want to assume I know what anyone is thinking, but I'm trying to figure out the motivation behind this request. At this point I will not support this signature line idea.
I agree with Greg's comment "this statement (Wayne's signature line recommendation) will trigger the assumption that the review is biased." Furthermore, the sig line follows the member throughout the entire site, potentially triggering bias with ever post the member makes. That simply isn't fair. Maybe you think it is, maybe you feel every post is already biased. I don't want to assume I know what anyone is thinking, but I'm trying to figure out the motivation behind this request. At this point I will not support this signature line idea.