Holmz said:There is a triton in 230v which is nice for a table mount.
If one need maximum power, then there is only 1 expensive choice.
Well, there's this baby too:
https://www.timberwolftools.com/mafell-lo65ec-hand-router
Holmz said:There is a triton in 230v which is nice for a table mount.
If one need maximum power, then there is only 1 expensive choice.
Steven Owen said:The Milwaukee 5625-20 is superior to the PC7518 and second fiddle to the OF2200 for Router Table use. I’m not 100% if they make a 5625-20 in 230 V.
Cheese said:Steven Owen said:The Milwaukee 5625-20 is superior to the PC7518 and second fiddle to the OF2200 for Router Table use. I’m not 100% if they make a 5625-20 in 230 V.
I have a 5625-20 in a router table and it’s a beast. A truly fantastic, powerful router, but it functions best in a router table because it does not have a plunge base and a plunge base is not available.
I’m not aware of a 5625-20 router being available in 230V.
Steven Owen said:It runs circles around the Triton and the Porter Cable when use large panel bits in a router table.
It’s the only motor I can think of that can give the OF 2200 a run for it’s money.
antss said:why didn't you just buy a shaper if you needed all that power ?
antss said:Holmz said:There is a triton in 230v which is nice for a table mount.
If one need maximum power, then there is only 1 expensive choice.
Well, there's this baby too:
https://www.timberwolftools.com/mafell-lo65ec-hand-router
Holmz said:antss said:Holmz said:There is a triton in 230v which is nice for a table mount.
If one need maximum power, then there is only 1 expensive choice.
Well, there's this baby too:
https://www.timberwolftools.com/mafell-lo65ec-hand-router
Clearly it is what I would likely be getting, but to take a contrarian stance...
The triton has a slick little depth adjuster that works from the business side of the machine.
So it also alleviates the need for a separate lift.
In a table application it makes some sense to me to compare the Triton with the Mafell.
egmiii said:[member=21641]amt[/member] Would you mind posting a link to the spindle motor and VFD you bought? Does it fit without shims? I have an Incra Master Lift II that I haven't put together yet and was thinking of going down the water cooled route, but the tolerances required to fit without shims gave me pause. Most spindles are 80mm, which Incra confirmed would not fit. And no, I don't need the power. Already have a Felder shaper. Just want to do it to see if it can be done.
Steven Owen said:...
Why would anyone waste a pricey Mafell on a router table? It would be cheaper to put a powerful motor in a lift and put the Mafell to use on challenging free tasks where it really shines.
Holmz said:Steven Owen said:...
Why would anyone waste a pricey Mafell on a router table? It would be cheaper to put a powerful motor in a lift and put the Mafell to use on challenging free tasks where it really shines.
Do you missed the numerous posts about the PC or the Trition as being good choices for a table?
Sometimes it is not about cost, but other factors.
Some reasons I would use to convince myself...
(I have an 8-mm router, and do not have a lot of "shop room".)
- a large router that can do both table and freehand work may not be optimal in terms of flow, but I would only need one. (The 2200 works in this space)
- For the occasional "shaper like use" the most powerful router would be the one likely to not stall.
- the LO65 is the most powerful
- the LO65 only one actually recommended for use with the Ligna timber tool.
Of course a few of us mentioned the PC and the Triton, for table use, as a pretty viable option.
Offended is not the right word, but being judged on how I may want to spend or "WASTE" my money, when I could have gotten some different cheaper tool... does not really go down well with me.
However; I am happy discussing the reasoning of why I may want one, and noodling out whether the reasoning is sound.
I am not sure using a 2600W router freehand is wise... So I am not sure that it "SHINES" there... But I am imagining the scenes out of the Shining.
If one only has room, or funding, for a single router... then the FT1400 does take the 1/2" bits, which are ubiquitous in the US. I cannot think of many good arguments to have a 1400 and then shove it into a table... Unless one was pulling it out often.
(But for some reason the less frills LO65, with the big block motor, seems like it makes sense.)
Luckily most of my current needs are satisfied with the 8-mm bits. But I have some doors coming up, and this thread parallels the same chin scratchings.
I would suggest you go for a CMS-GE instead the -VL.HowardH said:I'm really leaning towards a CMS-VL and put my OF1400 in it.
I have two CMS-GE (usually permanently setup with OF and TS 75 plates, unless I need the tools as handhelds), no real complaints after I got used to it.Has there been much buyer remorse for any of you who have either CMS?
Unless you need an inverted, fixed jigsaw on a regular basis (for whatever reason): most likely a bandsaw is more useful.I'm also going to get from Ebay a Trion CMS plate too so there's always that consideration.
That's the thing with the CMS-VL: you can't use the MFT as outfeed, unless you have another one.HowardH said:I wouldn't need to get the set then as I can use my MFT as an outfeed table when necessary.