1400 Router Pros and Cons

They sell just the motor for the PC 7518, you don't need a base if your going to use it in a router table (PC 75182)
https://www.amazon.com/PORTER-CABLE...i&ie=UTF8&qid=1508203929&sr=1-1&keywords=7518+motor#Ask

Incra Master Lift IIhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B007JTYFK...feature-scomp-wm-4-wl-prc1&ref=bit_scomp_sav1

Incra LS Super Systemhttp://www.incrementaltools.com/INCRA_LS_Super_System_17_Range_p/ls17wfncsys.htm

Incra Clean Sweephttp://www.incra.com/router_system_accessories-cleansweep.html

Buy one of Incra's tables or make one of your own
 
Steven Owen said:
The Milwaukee 5625-20 is superior to the PC7518 and second fiddle to the OF2200 for Router Table use.  I’m not 100% if they make a 5625-20 in 230 V.

I have a 5625-20 in a router table and it’s a beast. A truly fantastic, powerful router, but it functions best in a router table because it does not have a plunge base and a plunge base is not available.

I’m not aware of a 5625-20 router being available in 230V.
 
Cheese said:
Steven Owen said:
The Milwaukee 5625-20 is superior to the PC7518 and second fiddle to the OF2200 for Router Table use.  I’m not 100% if they make a 5625-20 in 230 V.

I have a 5625-20 in a router table and it’s a beast. A truly fantastic, powerful router, but it functions best in a router table because it does not have a plunge base and a plunge base is not available.

I’m not aware of a 5625-20 router being available in 230V.

I never been able to figure out why Milwaukee won’t sell the 5625 as a motor only.  I think a lot people buy this router and toss the flat base in the recycle bin.  It runs circles around the Triton and the Porter Cable when use large panel bits in a router table. 

It’s the only motor I can think of that can give the OF 2200 a run for it’s money.

Makita and Milwaukee have the same problem.  They both build amazing motors but they forget to finish the rest of the machines. 
 
Steven Owen said:
It runs circles around the Triton and the Porter Cable when use large panel bits in a router table. 

It’s the only motor I can think of that can give the OF 2200 a run for it’s money.

I agree, if Milwaukee were to enhance the handling characteristics of this router, power wise it is very easily the equivalent of the 2200. Those big goofy side handles make it only suitable for router table table use. And then there's the dust collection issue...

I also have to admit that it'd be a shame to just hang a 2200 under a router table as the reasons for purchasing it would be diminished.
 
Many will probably think I am crazy, but I have purchased a 4HP, 3-phase spindle motor and a 5HP VFD, plus the Jessem/Incra router lift for my router table.  I have not assembled it yet, but it should be the last in-table router I ever need.  Not cheap, but less expensive than the OF2200 (which I also have for hand held use).  Spindle is also water cooled, so I won't have that router air flow interference going on.
 
antss said:
why didn't you just buy a shaper if you needed all that power ?

Shapers are (a) expensive (b) big (c) don't necessarily spin to high RPM.  The cost of my solution was slightly more than a standard router.
 
antss said:
Holmz said:
There is a triton in 230v which is nice for a table mount.
If one need maximum power, then there is only 1 expensive choice.

Well, there's this baby too:
https://www.timberwolftools.com/mafell-lo65ec-hand-router

Clearly it is what I would likely be getting, but to take a contrarian stance...

The triton has a slick little depth adjuster that works from the business side of the machine.
So it also alleviates the need for a separate lift.

In a table application it makes some sense to me to compare the Triton with the Mafell.
 
[member=21641]amt[/member] Would you mind posting a link to the spindle motor and VFD you bought? Does it fit without shims? I have an Incra Master Lift II that I haven't put together yet and was thinking of going down the water cooled route, but the tolerances required to fit without shims gave me pause. Most spindles are 80mm, which Incra confirmed would not fit. And no, I don't need the power. Already have a Felder shaper. Just want to do it to see if it can be done.
 
Holmz said:
antss said:
Holmz said:
There is a triton in 230v which is nice for a table mount.
If one need maximum power, then there is only 1 expensive choice.

Well, there's this baby too:
https://www.timberwolftools.com/mafell-lo65ec-hand-router

Clearly it is what I would likely be getting, but to take a contrarian stance...

The triton has a slick little depth adjuster that works from the business side of the machine.
So it also alleviates the need for a separate lift.

In a table application it makes some sense to me to compare the Triton with the Mafell.

Why would anyone waste a pricey Mafell on a router table?  It would be cheaper to put a powerful motor in a lift and put the Mafell to use on challenging free tasks where it really shines.
 
At this point, can't add much, but I would agree that using an expensive router like the OF1400 or a Mafell in a table is kind of a waste of a great router. I would opt for (and did) for a router motor that is really just made for the table. I'm sure others can recommend motors just as good or better but, for me, the PC 7518 motor has worked well. It has a lot of power to do almost anything I'd want to do with it. So far, no problems with it although it seems others have had some.
 
egmiii said:
[member=21641]amt[/member] Would you mind posting a link to the spindle motor and VFD you bought? Does it fit without shims? I have an Incra Master Lift II that I haven't put together yet and was thinking of going down the water cooled route, but the tolerances required to fit without shims gave me pause. Most spindles are 80mm, which Incra confirmed would not fit. And no, I don't need the power. Already have a Felder shaper. Just want to do it to see if it can be done.

[member=11423]egmiii[/member] I have not finished mounting the pindle, but it looks like I will need to use ~1/8" shim.  I was just going to pick up some 1/8" aluminum bar stock and wrap it around the spindle.  If it's too thick, I'll mill it down a bit.  I believe my spindle is 100mm.  I got one off ebay, and it had the description of, "TOP 3KW WATER-COOLED MOTOR SPINDLE ENGRAVING MILL GRIND 220V CNC".

The VFD I got is from ENC, 5HP, designed specifically for 1 phase input.  PM me if you want more info, and I can put you in touch with the seller.
 
Steven Owen said:
...

Why would anyone waste a pricey Mafell on a router table?  It would be cheaper to put a powerful motor in a lift and put the Mafell to use on challenging free tasks where it really shines.

Do you missed the numerous posts about the PC or the Trition as being good choices for a table?

Sometimes it is not about cost, but other factors.

Some reasons I would use to convince myself...
(I have an 8-mm router, and do not have a lot of "shop room".)

- a large router that can do both table and freehand work may not be optimal in terms of flow, but I would only need one. (The 2200 works in this space)

- For the occasional "shaper like use" the most powerful router would be the one likely to not stall.
- the LO65 is the most powerful

- the LO65 only one actually recommended for use with the Ligna timber tool.

Of course a few of us mentioned the PC and the Triton, for table use, as a pretty viable option.

Offended is not the right word, but being judged on how I may want to spend or "WASTE" my money, when I could have gotten some different cheaper tool... does not really go down well with me.

However; I am happy discussing the reasoning of why I may want one, and noodling out whether the reasoning is sound.

I am not sure using a 2600W router freehand is wise... So I am not sure that it "SHINES" there... But I am imagining the scenes out of the Shining.

If one only has room, or funding, for a single router... then the FT1400 does take the 1/2" bits, which are ubiquitous in the US. I cannot think of many good arguments to have a 1400 and then shove it into a table... Unless one was pulling it out often.
(But for some reason the less frills LO65, with the big block motor, seems like it makes sense.)

Luckily most of my current needs are satisfied with the 8-mm bits. But I have some doors coming up, and this thread parallels the same chin scratchings.
 
Holmz said:
Steven Owen said:
...

Why would anyone waste a pricey Mafell on a router table?  It would be cheaper to put a powerful motor in a lift and put the Mafell to use on challenging free tasks where it really shines.

Do you missed the numerous posts about the PC or the Trition as being good choices for a table?

Sometimes it is not about cost, but other factors.

Some reasons I would use to convince myself...
(I have an 8-mm router, and do not have a lot of "shop room".)

- a large router that can do both table and freehand work may not be optimal in terms of flow, but I would only need one. (The 2200 works in this space)

- For the occasional "shaper like use" the most powerful router would be the one likely to not stall.
- the LO65 is the most powerful

- the LO65 only one actually recommended for use with the Ligna timber tool.

Of course a few of us mentioned the PC and the Triton, for table use, as a pretty viable option.

Offended is not the right word, but being judged on how I may want to spend or "WASTE" my money, when I could have gotten some different cheaper tool... does not really go down well with me.

However; I am happy discussing the reasoning of why I may want one, and noodling out whether the reasoning is sound.

I am not sure using a 2600W router freehand is wise... So I am not sure that it "SHINES" there... But I am imagining the scenes out of the Shining.

If one only has room, or funding, for a single router... then the FT1400 does take the 1/2" bits, which are ubiquitous in the US. I cannot think of many good arguments to have a 1400 and then shove it into a table... Unless one was pulling it out often.
(But for some reason the less frills LO65, with the big block motor, seems like it makes sense.)

Luckily most of my current needs are satisfied with the 8-mm bits. But I have some doors coming up, and this thread parallels the same chin scratchings.

It wasn’t meant as an insult.  I was doing the math in my head for price of a Mafell or OF 2200 and a solid router table, you’re coming pretty close to the price of a decent quality Shaper.
 
This thread hits home for me.  I'm currently weighing my options. I had a full sized router table but got rid of it due to space considerations. I'm really leaning towards a CMS-VL and put my OF1400 in it.  For what I will use it for, the 1400 should have plenty of power. I thought about the Incra system but I had a Jointech for while and found I didn't need the positioner as I have a couple of Leigh jigs I can use which I presume would also work of the CMS. It's a lot of money to start with so I'm wondering if going whole hog and getting the set is worth it.  I don't build cabinet doors so I'm wondering what other applications the miter fence and the sliding table would be.  I really need the dust collection accessory tho.  I also think it would be a good thing to be able to fold up the table and store it out of the way when I'm not using it.  That's kinda hard to do with a traditional router table.  Has there been much buyer remorse for any of you who have either CMS?  I'm also going to get from Ebay a Trion CMS plate too so there's always that consideration.
 
HowardH said:
I'm really leaning towards a CMS-VL and put my OF1400 in it.
I would suggest you go for a CMS-GE instead the -VL.
Reasoning:
+ can be used on its own
+ when folded down to store the plate can stay in (as it guarantees room for the mounted tool)
+ feed direction can bet setup freely in relation to the MFT, not only perpendicular like with the -VL
+ footprint when folded not that much worse than the -VL (which has longer legs)
+ not that much more expensive than the -VL
+ can also be attached easily to a MFT with a simple jig (out of two boards, top one with triangles glued on to go into the v-groves, held together with a screw) on all sides

Has there been much buyer remorse for any of you who have either CMS?
I have two CMS-GE (usually permanently setup with OF and TS 75 plates, unless I need the tools as handhelds), no real complaints after I got used to it.
I'm also going to get from Ebay a Trion CMS plate too so there's always that consideration.
Unless you need an inverted, fixed jigsaw on a regular basis (for whatever reason): most likely a bandsaw is more useful.
 
I wouldn't need to get the set then as I can use my MFT as an outfeed table when necessary. The only accessory I see really being mandatory is the dust collection hoses, etc.
 
HowardH said:
I wouldn't need to get the set then as I can use my MFT as an outfeed table when necessary.
That's the thing with the CMS-VL: you can't use the MFT as outfeed, unless you have another one.
 
Back
Top