I plan to purchase a CMS router table later this year (sooner if the tax man is good to me). As a space constrained hobby woodworker, I am leaning towards the VL model, but I have several questions . . .
1. How significant is the space savings of the VL vs. the GE table in actual use? It seems that the GE could be butted up against the end of my MFT/3 with little difference in space consumed vs. the VL -- am I correct? I can deal with the price difference between the two versions, but space is somewhat of an issue.
2. With the fence off (it appears to come on and off quickly enough), how well would the VL and GE each function as an extension to the MFT/3 for support of long boards during cross cutting? Obviously, I would have to be careful not to run the track saw across the surface of the CMS if I were doing long rip cuts!
3. I know the extension table will not fit the VL model. That said, how problematic is the lack of an extension table?
4. Are there any other major accessories not yet available in North America, such as the track saw module, that would not work with the VL table should they become available here in the future? Given the cost of either table, I want my purchase to be as future proof as possible.
5. Does the VL do anything better or more efficiently than the GE version and vice versa?