Holmz
Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2014
- Messages
- 4,001
Owego said:...
On a side note, I met an Australian a few years ago, WWII vet, and wood worker, he said he'd never made the conversion to metric.
^He^ was likely a man of high calibre. [wink]
I everyday life I use both for distance. Nanometers to lightyears in metric. For estimated distance I usually think in yards and take 10% off for Meters or x3 for feet.
I can convert km/hr and mph in my head, but for meters/second it seems bewildering, so I generally think in feet per second and convert to m/s.
For torque I think in foot-pounds and need to convert.
HP and kW seem equally acceptable.
Acceleration seems easier in G-force than in either f/sec^2 or metric...
For temperature C seems easier. Certainly if one is choosing ski waxes or cold weather clothing.
I never worry if it is negative C, as I know I will not get wet. But at +5-15C I am sure I could die from hypothermia.
Our tape measures are spilt ~50/50. The smaller ones are generally metric and the longer ones imperial.
Anything sewing is metric, and conversions of diameter to circumference is a lot easier in homogeneous units.
Paper is mostly A4, but I keep a few 8-1/2x11 and legal size around.