Birdhunter
Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2012
- Messages
- 4,144
Splines solve both the alignment issue and the strength issue.
squall_line said:HowardH said:Hello, Peter. These boxes will be used as a floating nightstand and will need to be able to withstand the weight not only of a table lamp but potentially books, etc in the open section. I'm afraid that a mitered end grain joint wouldn't hold up to the weight without the added strength the addition of a domino/dowel would bring.
In this case, would the dowels into each face be providing that much added strength, or just registration for fitting?
I would think that dowels parallel to the ground, in a mitered joint, would offer not only registration, but also strength against breakage as well as a parallel plane to clamp against.
Or a lock joint, or a lock dowel, or...?
Isn't that essentially what the dowels would do, except they are hidden?Birdhunter said:Splines solve both the alignment issue and the strength issue.
HowardH said:I could certainly construct the boxes using a butt joint but I would want the top surface to be continuous rather than the vertical pieces be visible by having them attach to the outside of the horizontal pieces. That would work well strength wise but not aesthetically. Otherwise, having the end pieces attached on the underside where the dowels would be inserted vertically which would add no strength. I would think a row of them inserted into the miter as shown would add sufficient strength unless I was shown otherwise.
squall_line said:HowardH said:I could certainly construct the boxes using a butt joint but I would want the top surface to be continuous rather than the vertical pieces be visible by having them attach to the outside of the horizontal pieces. That would work well strength wise but not aesthetically. Otherwise, having the end pieces attached on the underside where the dowels would be inserted vertically which would add no strength. I would think a row of them inserted into the miter as shown would add sufficient strength unless I was shown otherwise.
I meant still use a miter joint, but use the dowels perpendicular to the face of the box, rather than perpendicular to the face of the cut.
Oldwood said:The side that goes against the wall does not need to be finish grade, if I understand your project.
If you cut miters on the front of the bottom and top pieces, then dowel and clamp the vertical pieces in but set them back 3/4"+ from the front and back you could fit and glue the front on after the box is stable. Then you only need to clam in 1 direction.
You would not be able to dowel the front on unless the dowels ran in the same direction as the top, but you should not need dowels, and they would make clamping more difficult.
This would leave a recess for your french cleat.
Oldwood said:That is not what I had imagined,So clearly my plan will not work! [eek]
I think I would build it as it looks in your picture, then veneer the sides to cover the butt joint. You could use ply and this would cover the ends. You could band the front edges with light pieces mitred to give you the look you want.
I think this would be stronger than the mitres and would take about the same time or maybe less, depending on how your veneering goes.
Oldwood said:I think I would build it as it looks in your picture, then veneer the sides to cover the butt joint.