The CT Mini is not the same dimensions as Systainers -
Well, the last generation was. Sorta, maybe, not really. MINI is the same height as two Sys3 stacked together. And though not exactly the same height in that Greman precision sort of way, a MINI was close enough in height to stack next to a Sys4+1 or other similar combos to have a relatively flat top with 9 stacks arranged in a 3x3 cube. That's my go to config. to fit under the parcel cover in the back of my range rover or landcruiser.
The new gen MINI - you're correct, they don't lineup. But that's with the last gen Systainers. I suspect it does align with the newest generation of systainers that are currently shipping. Though I have not verified that.
My initial issue with CT-SYS was that too small hose garage. Not only did it barely house what it was intended to , It messed with my transport system. All was solved when I scrapped the sys1 garage for a homebrew Sys2 like discussed here already. Sys-MFT has never done anything for me, and it makes carrying the vac kinda awkward - so I didn't opt for that.
***********
I am wondering if CT-SYS is due for a re-design given the new Systainer sizing ?
[member=71429]DerickC[/member] , [member=69210]jimmyboygr[/member] , [member=48572]Shane Holland[/member], [member=1619]SRSemenza[/member]