CTL 26 suction not quite what I expected (brand new)

mino said:
Alex said:
That was ok for me with the 22 and 26, but with the smaller vacs suction drops dramatically when they get to the half way point.
The Self-Clean apparently relies on the small pressure differential from the huge filter area and smaller ones have the filter area in contact with the bag about half as big.

Do you observe that suction loss as permanent, i.e. the filter truly clogs, or does an occasional manual-clean tap help?

Thinking of adding a Mini ...

No need to think, get it when you can. It’s an overall great vac. It doesn’t matter if another vac sucks a bump in your floor in shear power. Alex is pleased with his older model Mini, so are huge numbers of professionals, and the new Mini gets even better praise.

Thanks for your nerdiness [member=71910]Cypren[/member]  [big grin] It confirms my experience.
I was in fact quite surprised by the small diameter tubing in the CT-VA when I first received it. The Oneida must be much better for larger chip/sawdust producing machines.. - Got me thinking a bit, although I have only tried it with the CT-SYS and my Bosch GEX Turbo. The bag almost choked the CT-SYS all the time by the collapsing bag..
 
FestitaMakool said:
The Oneida must be much better for larger chip/sawdust producing machines.
I've been wondering about this as well and keep thinking about picking one up to find out. The CT-VA is great for handling the castoff from lighter tools, but when I'm using the HL 850 or the Kapex -- the things that throw off the most chips, where the cyclone would be most useful -- I usually need to hook them directly to the vacuum to get decent collection. At the same time, though, it really sucks to give up the VA's nice compact form factor and the ability to use the top as a rolling Systainer cart: I use that constantly.

The devil on my shoulder reminds me that I can solve this problem by just getting a second dust extractor, and my, doesn't that shiny new CT 48 AC HEPA look tempting...
 
I use my CT26 for tools and for general cleanup, because having a separate vac for cleanup vs. tools doesn't make much sense to me.  The 36mm hose is much much better for cleanup.  Whether or not there is enough "suck" with a 27mm hose the fittings are too small and inevitably are a point for blockages if you have any splinters or things aside from fine dust.

I don't have a new smooth hose, but the 36mm hose is not significantly more difficult to deal with than the 27mm hose IMO.  My 27mm hose has been in storage since I got the 36mm hose, because thinking about switching them makes no sense to me.
 
Cypren said:
Alex said:
I have a used Nilfisk home vac I bought for 10 euros and it has a lot more power than any Festool vac I have ever tried. And same for any other home vac I owned or used.
That's to be expected: home vacuums aren't filtered like a proper dust extractor and so their motors don't have to work nearly as hard to get the same kind of airflow. Any home or shop vac using its standard filter should vastly exceed the airflow of a dust extractor with a comparable-size motor: if it doesn't, something is badly wrong with one of the two.

But comparing them is like comparing a sports car to a pickup truck: they're machines built for different purposes and intentionally make different engineering tradeoffs.

They are made for the exact same thing, sucking up unwanted stuff.

The Festool vacs sure have better filtration. When you use a home vac, you have this vacuming smell all over the house and need to open a door or a window to get fresh air. You don't smell a thing with the festool vacs.

But as for trade off, the motor of the Festool vac is 8 or 10 times bigger than the Nilfisk. I expect more from that. I have worked with many other tool vacs, Bosch, Metabo, Hitachi, Starmix, and almost all of them were stronger than the home vacs I'm talking about, and a lot stronger than the Festool vacs.
 
I'm actually stunned by the negative feedback about Festool CT's. I have used other vacs and own a Fein with a HEPA filter along with my CT48 and CTSYS. For my Festools, like the Domino, TS55, OF1400, OF1010, and sanders, I don't feel I've owned another vac which has done a better job pulling the dust in as opposed to leaving in the shop. I realize that some of the dust collection efficiency has to do with tool design, but I guess that's part of the picture. As for floor cleanup, certainly the 36mm hose works better, but, since it's an extra step (for which I'm sometimes lazy) I use the 27mm hose almost always and it works great for shavings and sawdust. Since I also turn as well as do other woodworking, I have a lot of shavings that aren't easily cleaned up with a broom and dustpan or other means in my shop. It's likely there are other vacs with more suction, but the Festool CT48 I have owned for at least 5 years does a completely satisfying job of keeping dust out of the air from my tools and cleaning up after I'm done. I would never use it for my router table, tablesaw, bandsaw, planer, or jointer but it's not designed to move the amount of air required for adequate dust collection for those tools.
 
Total suction power is not necessarily the top goal. The variable dial to allow you to turn it down for sanders as well as the built-in tool-trigger are both things that the typical shop-vac does not have.
Along with the increased filtration, Systainer docking, hose garage, and bluetooth switch, there are advantages to being part of the "system".
 
Festool vacs work great with a tool attached. Indeed, you don't need very high suction to make that work. I am very satisfied about the Festool vacs in that department, that's why I have owned 4 by now, and will keep on owning them in the future.

I work mostly in home renovation, not in a perfectly clean wood shop where you only have to saw and sand wood and then clean a perfectly flat, coated floor afterwards. Wood dust/chips/shavings is one of the lightest types of dust you can find and is very easy to vacuum.

But to renovate a home, there is a lot of demolition before. Out goes the old, in goes the new. This makes a lot of mess of varying types of dust, and a lot of stone and metal, which have a much higher density than wood. Not only is the volume of dirt a lot higher, but it is more difficult to suck up due to the higher density, and the rough nature of the floor, and now I find the Festool vacs are struggling compared to the competition.

When I go out on a job I need a vac that can handle both, I can't carry multiple vacs. Since they have variable suction, make it very strong on the upper end, and fine on the lower end.
 
Random Orbital Bob said:
...the suction is less than I was expecting

I am not sure exactly what you were expecting, or if you mean pressure or airflow.  The static (zero flow) pressure of a vacuum is not going to be too much different between brands, but I am not sure that measurement is relevant to real world use anyways.  The airflow is closely related to motor amps.  Any way you can compare airflow to another vacuum quantitatively, the way [member=71910]Cypren[/member] did in the earlier post ?    That would possibly give you an idea if perhaps there is a problem with your particular unit. 

HERE is a link to a quantitative comparison of vacs.  They test a CT36, but I am pretty sure the blower is identical to a CT26, just the size of the collection bag is different.  Strange that they show the Festool as being rather loud, I find it rather quiet (at least a heck of a lot quieter as my old Shopvac brand vac that I refused to turn on without first putting on hearing protection).
 
Yeah Alex, I get what you are saying. We are all doing different things and have different expectations from the same tools. The whole Sys3 thing is a perfect example. Some of us are shop users and others are on the road and it does make a difference.
Personally, I would never use my CT26 on a post-demo clean up for the really course stuff, like nails, screws, etc like I would a cheap shop vac. I would pick up/sweep up what I could first and just the dust after.
I can certainly see not carrying both, not only because of space in the van, but because of the filtration difference. Shop vacs do great with the worst things, but they also seem to spread the fine dust better than the demo itself did.
When you are in someone's home or functioning office space, cleanliness is huge.

Like you said, for me in a huge, clean, well ventilated, smooth floored shop, dust collection is as much about not having to clean it up afterword as anything else. Sometimes it makes the cut better like with deep mortices with a router or Domino
 
Steve1 said:
Random Orbital Bob said:
...the suction is less than I was expecting

I am not sure exactly what you were expecting, or if you mean pressure or airflow.  The static (zero flow) pressure of a vacuum is not going to be too much different between brands, but I am not sure that measurement is relevant to real world use anyways.  The airflow is closely related to motor amps.  Any way you can compare airflow to another vacuum quantitatively, the way [member=71910]Cypren[/member] did in the earlier post ?    That would possibly give you an idea if perhaps there is a problem with your particular unit. 

HERE is a link to a quantitative comparison of vacs.  They test a CT36, but I am pretty sure the blower is identical to a CT26, just the size of the collection bag is different.  Strange that they show the Festool as being rather loud, I find it rather quiet (at least a heck of a lot quieter as my old Shopvac brand vac that I refused to turn on without first putting on hearing protection).

Also the vacuum/suction level drop during use. I frequently forget to check my bag, especially when I first got it, not realizing how much more debris it was taking in than my old shop vac that I used before it. I usually realize that it is getting full when swapping hoses between the usual tool hose and the one I keep plugged into my router table. When it gets full, some residue drops out when unplugging the hose, but if I don't make a swap to notice this? The CT still continues to draw at the same level of vacuum until the hose is full. Early on I did this right up to the point where the hose was so full that the chips had no where to go. It was totally my fault, but totally amazing that it could fill the hose and still suck.
 
Crazyraceguy said:
The CT still continues to draw at the same level of vacuum until the hose is full. Early on I did this right up to the point where the hose was so full that the chips had no where to go. It was totally my fault, but totally amazing that it could fill the hose and still suck.
This is smart engineering on Festool’s part: most shop vacs extend their intake filter down into the collection chamber, where debris will build up around it as the chamber gets full and block it off. Festool makes theirs a flat filter in the roof of the chamber, so gravity is always working to pull debris away from the filter and keep it as open as possible. It won’t be blocked off until the chamber is almost completely packed. This means the nominal capacity of the vacuum in liters is only a tiny bit larger than the actual capacity it can fill in practice, which is unusual.
 
FestitaMakool said:
I was in fact quite surprised by the small diameter tubing in the CT-VA ..
This is necessary. To work well a cyclone must achieve a certain air speed. With sanders the air volume is generally pretty low, so CT-VA must use uses tight air tubing to work even at the low air flows required.

This still provides mostly the equivalent of a 32/27 hose resistance so is acceptable for a TS55 and yet is usable with sanders. Any cyclone optimized for a higher air flow will have a lower efficiency at the typical sander air flow values to the point of making it pointless.
 
Well thanks to all who have contributed to what was a fairly "innocent" first question by me :-)  Being new to FOG, but not new to woodworking forums (used to moderate UKW), I'm impressed by the healthy community out there.

Cypren, your input makes a lot of sense, not least because, like me, you're data driven and the empirical measurement is difficult to argue against since it removes many of the variables.  I did make specific mention in the first place that my "measure of suction" was anecdotal and I'll tell you now what it was specifically. I placed my hand over the 27mm hose from a brand new CT26 with a brand new long life bag being used for the first time.  That was compared to a normal domestic Henry Hoover (which of course also has a HEPA filter and works very well).  The Henry unquestionably has a bit more "suck" and I think that was what slightly deflated my balloon because i hold Festool in very esteem.  I think my original assumption was that not only would it be a dream managing tool dust at source but that it would deal with the post work clean up too.  Thats the bit my expectation is slightly changing as a result of this debate.  Perhaps, OK for bits n bobs from the hose end, but maybe not with a floor gulping type tool and expect to hoover round the ground of the workshop like I was using the Henry for??  I will add the 36mm hose as that clearly seems superior.  I'm now slightly annoyed I didnt get this choice at purchase because I'm clearly about to shell out another £140 odd to make the hose I only bought last week redundant!  Thats "taking the mickey" a bit is it not?  Why dont Festool offer a hose upgrade cost at the point of sale?? 

But anyway, input appreciated and useful.  Many thanks.  Bob
 
All I can say is I purchased a CT33 in 2008 for my hobby shop and it sucks today as well as it did on day one.
 
Random Orbital Bob said:
That was compared to a normal domestic Henry Hoover (which of course also has a HEPA filter and works very well).  The Henry unquestionably has a bit more "suck" and I think that was what slightly deflated my balloon because i hold Festool in very esteem.  I think my original assumption was that not only would it be a dream managing tool dust at source but that it would deal with the post work clean up too.  Thats the bit my expectation is slightly changing as a result of this debate.  Perhaps, OK for bits n bobs from the hose end, but maybe not with a floor gulping type tool and expect to hoover round the ground of the workshop like I was using the Henry for??  I will add the 36mm hose as that clearly seems superior.  I'm now slightly annoyed I didnt get this choice at purchase because I'm clearly about to shell out another £140 odd to make the hose I only bought last week redundant!

Couple of thoughts here:

First, if you want to compare two shop vacs, to make it apples-to-apples, there are really three main things you need to make sure are equal: the grade of filtration, the type of bag in use, and the diameter and length of the hose being used.

Shop vacs (at least in the US; I can’t speak for elsewhere) usually come with a very coarse filter, no bag, and a very large diameter, short hose. (Ex: my Ridgid came with a 65mm, 2m hose.) This is an ideal configuration for cleanup of random trash on the floor: it’s mostly large, coarse material, not fine particulate, so it won’t spray a ton back in the air or clog the filter. It’s meant for wet and dry work that would wreck a dust bag. It’s expected that you’ll attach tube extensions and a head to the short hose so you can use it comfortably at standing height while sweeping up the floor, so a long hose would just mean worse airflow and more hassle. The enormous diameter of the hose makes it cumbersome to maneuver, but ensures it can pick up objects in a wide radius without obstruction.

In comparison, the CT series come with a HEPA filter, a fleece bag that acts as a secondary filter, and a thin, long hose (27mm, 3.5m) that’s very flexible and has a mesh cover to both protect the hose and ensure that it slips and slides off of both itself and obstacles in the environment rather than catching on them. (Necessary inclusion for the pedantic: the CT 48 comes with a 36mm hose, and the 36 AC comes with a special hose for the Planex.) This is a configuration that assumes you want to use this machine connected to a power tool, where the hose needs to move around freely, stay out of your way, and be as light as possible. It assumes that you prioritize maximum filtration, because you’re working with fine dust with major safety concerns, and can’t just expel it back into the air. It assumes that the filter is very expensive (US$100, compared to $13 for the Ridgid’s standard filter) and so you want a secondary filter (the bag) to ensure that you don’t have to replace the primary one regularly, even though this is going to impede airflow even further.

This is what I meant earlier when I said it’s sports car vs. pickup truck: these are both “vehicles to get from one place to another”, but they assume the driver intends to use them very, very differently, so they’ve prioritized completely different tradeoffs in design.

In this case, however, you can actually turn the CT into a pretty effective shop vac, but it requires changing out the accessories. Specifically, you want the industrial cleaning set (454770), which includes a 50mm x 2.5m hose and extensions and accessories to go with it. To maximize airflow, you would also want to remove the bag and swap the HEPA filter for the one micron filter element (496170), which will have much better airflow and still capture most environmental dust, but not the really fine particles. You may also want to add the Large Industrial Floor Nozzle (452910) and aluminum extension tube (447599).

The thing is that by the time you’ve done all of this, you’ve basically spent at least another $200 (and about $500 if you bought the nice metal accessories) to turn your $800-$1000 dust extractor into a $100 shop vac from Home Depot. A quieter, better built one (as AvE would say, “made in Jcherrrrmany”), but otherwise pretty ordinary shop vac.

This really just doesn’t make a lot of sense if you’re in a workshop and can just have a second machine. It might make sense for jobsite workers who can’t afford the space to take a second vacuum, but even then, it’s a hassle to switch the filters and accessories around every time you want to flip from dust extraction to site cleanup, and time is money.

The only way I can see this being useful is for people who really can’t take more than one vacuum with them, have to obey rigid workplace safety laws regarding dust filtration, and have an enormous mess to clean up when they’re done, such that the time spent switching over the accessories is paid off in the time saved during cleanup.
 
Righto....thanks Cypren.  That makes perfect sense.  So I will reverse my expectation that what is clearly a "Porsche" for dangerous and very fine tool dust collection at source, shouldn't be confused with a "Mac truck" for dealing with anything on the floor.

One assumes that once the Porsche has done its job, there shouldn't be any fine particles in the environment anyway (not much at least) and therefore its entirely sensible to use a regular shop vac for "hoovering" rather than DX as such.

So I'll keep my Henry for general cleanup and leave the festool for "tool at source" work.

Er.....does anyone want to buy a 27mm hose and a lifetime bag....hardly used :-)
 
And while I'm on....I'm about to replace my 14 year old Dewalt SCMS.  You guessed it....the Kapex 120 is calling me!  Before I take out a small additional mortgage....is there anything I should know about that sucker?
 
It's really awesome to see a reference to AvE! That guy is fantastic, been watching him for years.
He would also say it was Skookum.
 
Random Orbital Bob said:
And while I'm on....I'm about to replace my 14 year old Dewalt SCMS.  You guessed it....the Kapex 120 is calling me!  Before I take out a small additional mortgage....is there anything I should know about that sucker?

Easy: Get a 5m 36mm hose, cut 1-1,5m off of the hose (buy a set of tool end and vac end too) and make this one for the KS 120  [big grin] Use the other better half for shop clean up and air hungry tools. Oh, and maybe buy another hold down clamp, for the other side. Need no more. [wink]
 
Crazyraceguy said:
It's really awesome to see a reference to AvE! That guy is fantastic, been watching him for years.
He would also say it was Skookum.

Another avid AvE viewer here, I can hear the scookum superlatives if he ever was to examine a CT’s suction by any means..
 
Back
Top