DIY cnc

I've experienced #1 many times... with my Domino machines, my first 3D printer (which i outgrew quickly), home automation stuff and so on. #2 is the primary reason I want to stay away from the OneFinity/Shapeoko/Altmill, while they look like great machines, I get the feeling that you outgrow them pretty fast. I think i'm going to shelve the idea until i can come up with a solid use case other than "I want to get into it", thanks for all the feedback!
If you" want to get into it ", buy a used Shapeoko 3 or 4 to learn the ins and outs. I think the expectations of this level of machine is what turns people away - expecting them to cut like a large CNC, but you are limited to 1/8" or 1/4" passes at slow speeds and they get frustrated quickly.

And the Shapeoko 3 or 4 ( not the pro ) are belt driven, so they are much more forgiving when you crash the machine. You can still do a lot with them once dialed in if you use them within their limitations.
 
Note that, unless I'm wrong, even with Bench Pilot, you're not getting true Z-axis manipulation while cutting with the Shaper Origin. That doesn't matter for a lot of things, like engraving, inlays, cutting out sheet goods, even most joints. My first CNC project was a staircase newell topper, which my design was a hexagon (which are the best-agons), that was pyramidal, and built of two contrasting woods. I do not think that is still today possible on a Shaper Origin.

img_4040-jpg.365332


572333f27d59a1a746c24fc831dc6f70a65afb08.jpeg
Beautiful project nicely done! I can’t imagine how it could be done on the Shaper. Even with your CNC I expect you had a lot of Z steps to sand out they turned out great.
 
Even with your CNC I expect you had a lot of Z steps to sand out they turned out great.
Actually not much sanding. The ebony wedges were made separately on the CNC, then glued into a roughly machined on the CNC body:
6WedgesGlued.jpg

And then a finishing pass with a 1" core box bit:
FinishedHex.jpga

If you look closely, you can see where the core box bit cut into the sacrificial MDF platten.

Then the CNC machined center hex plug was glued in.
 
I feel so old school reading all you guys and your cnc’s
Things are just getting started here.

At some point, software like Fusion 360 will be at the point where you won't even have to define your own toolpaths. You just design the object you want in the software, specify the material and tolerances, load up the blank in the machine and press Go. And it seems like 3D printing is even closer to this state.
 
Things are just getting started here.

At some point, software like Fusion 360 will be at the point where you won't even have to define your own toolpaths. You just design the object you want in the software, specify the material and tolerances, load up the blank in the machine and press Go. And it seems like 3D printing is even closer to this state.
A lot of heated (ignorant) responses I see on social media think that's exactly what CNC is right now, tap the icon of the desired object, and off it goes pumping it out the end fully finished!
 
There are a couple of companies which are pushing AI features --- that said, when working with wood, selection, grain, grain-orientation relative to part/toolpath, finishing, all play a major role in the process, same as power or hand-tool woodworking.

For folks who are wondering what they are missing out on from CNC, you can do most of the CNC process on a computer with trial software:

Some folks prefer one way, others another --- both are valid (and some folks switch back and forth depending on mood/task).

All the above leaves out is: clamping selected stock in place, setting zero relative to it, loading the file, monitoring it while it cuts, post-processing the parts after they come off the machine (cutting tabs, &c.)
 
This is what I found most surprising and irritating about the Shaper Origin. It took many, many passes and a lot more grunt to push the router through the walnut than I expected.
Ok this is interesting to me! I thought at one point of getting a Shaper for inlay work in mainly hardwoods (which are often harder than Walnut), but having used CNC machines for years the physics of the Shaper always baffled me as everyone seems to rave about how capable, powerful and fast it is, but given the size and power I just couldn't see it.

Especially when I'm using trimmers with templates and guide rings and they can be a real struggle at times.
 
Saw this Thos. Moser video, which briefly shows use of a 5-axis CNC:


But, they still have over 150 jigs.

A side note is that they keep the humidity at 43% as the mid-point for expansion/contraction when the piece is in its final home.
 
Saw this Thos. Moser video, which briefly shows use of a 5-axis CNC:


But, they still have over 150 jigs.

A side note is that they keep the humidity at 43% as the mid-point for expansion/contraction when the piece is in its final home.

I got to see those CNCs when I toured Thos. Moser in October. They've added a third CNC since this video and put it at one end of chair shop near to where they do the radio frequency lamination. Really interesting stuff.

The CNC is something I've been debating in my mind a bit lately: "Is it REALLY 'woodworking'?" I recently saw a YouTube video about a woodworker making coffee scoops on his CNC. The scoops were perfectly nice looking but he's routing them out on the CNC, doing a little sanding, adding finish and selling them (evidently, he sells quite a few). They're nice, but I see that more as manufacturing than "woodworking" - or am I off?

I thought similarly while touring Thos. Moser. Like the video shows, they make some of the parts on the CNC, but they also hand-fit/assemble and hand-finish the rest of the process, so the CNC is only a component of their craft, not the majority. And as I toured the facility, everything else is being done by hand - and that bent lamination part: there was a point, after we saw the laminating, that I saw how it all goes together and was just floored by it. CNC aside, they produce some beautiful pieces. One of which is that 1972 Rocker. In person, that chair is utterly stunning. Sadly, I don't feel it translates well in pictures, but in-person, it's amazing.
 
I see that more as manufacturing than "woodworking" - or am I off?
A debate that will never end.

I've read that Mira Nakashima has decided to not adopt CNC and similar practices, but they do use power tools, and did even when George was alive. And, it wasn't all that long ago that people debated whether using power tools at all was real woodworking or not. Or, that line in the movie "Shane," where he helps the land owner chop up a stump, and the wife asks: "Joe, why don't you just hitch up the team?" And his response: "...this stump could say it beat us."



My personal view is that anything that helps the final product be better or made less expensively without sacrificing quality is a good thing. If CNC usage means more people can have solid wood dressers or chairs instead of Ikea particle board crap, that's a good thing. Those who care about the input of human labor should instead care more about the value of bespoke designs.
 
The CNC is something I've been debating in my mind a bit lately: "Is it REALLY 'woodworking'?"
IMO hell yes it is! CNC's are just another tool in the arsenal so far as I'm concerned.

I do a lot of very detailed work with CNC's, and the CNC machining component of the project generally is the smallest portion compared to the rest of the processes required.

For example, I machine the pockets on my charcuterie boards on the CNC, but until I got the mini Mirka sanders I was spending many hours hand sanding and finishing the pockets. The machining took probably 30 minutes, but the rest of the steps in making a board could take 12 hours easily from rough sawn timber to finished product.

And then there's also the high degree of design and creating tootlpaths required based on wood grain directions and milling considerations. Unless you're just cutting out geometric blocks, one project could take days to finesse the final design.
 
Back
Top