Job and Knock
Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2016
- Messages
- 159
OK, then, lets's see you cut a 5.1 metre length of skirting board by running it across an MFT/3. Getting that cut right first time is pretty much critical for skirtings and architraves and cornices (crown) and TBH the MFT/3 route is just so slooooow. Anyway, let's see how well you feel after you've humped your "small" MFT/3 up 5 flights of stairs to where you are working in a building without a lift (and incidentally humped it back down to the van at the end of the afternoon - every day for a week or ten). An MFT/3 is, incidentally, no more capable of being used to safely cut down an 8 x 4ft sheet of 22mm plywood into rips than a Unisaw is (in otherwords it's not) - a TS55, a rail, some lengths of 3 x 2 CLS (softwood) and a couple of trestles are a far better option for that (we do a lot of 8 and 10ft plywood rips). There are very good reasons why a mitre saw is preferable to an MFT/3 for some thingsSpiff said:...a mitre saw gets used mostly for cutting floorboards and fitting skirting and architrave. The table can do all those things and with better accuracy arguably. Plus it can handle panels and wider stock.
Good job, too. If you did you'd be bust in a month!grbmds said:For contractor or production work, I'd say you wouldn't want to rely on the MFT completely.
There is a case for installers or bench joiners needing different kit to furniture makers or hobbyists. Withoiut an SCMS, rail saw and portable rip saw (deWalt DW745) I'd be lost. I can do without a lot, but those three are essential to my everyday work. Everyone is different, though