Wooden Skye said:
Closing this thread I don't think is necessary, but if questions come up, I think we should give [member=57769]TylerC[/member] the opportunity and time to get the answers, not speculate. I just want to say that Tyler is getting slammed for doing his job and presenting announcements to this group. Tyler in my opinion you are doing a good job, keep it up.
So the general rule of thumb was to add 5 or 6 mm to compensate for the rail, what is the new recommendation? 5 mm is equal to .19 inches.
Sorry, but I totally disagree.
1. Festool's rep tells us that the change to imperial only is being made and that only imperial will be offered.
Festool's right as a company.
2. FOG'ers complain about not being allowed to have a choice.
Do you get a choice for everything you buy?
3. Festool's rep says choice can't be allowed because there are too many changes to the tools and it would be too expensive to offer a choice.
Again Festool's choice, but I agree with you that alternatives could be presented to customers at very minimal cost.
4. Then festool's rep shows us pictures and makes statements that tell us only the scales on the routers are being changed and not lead screws on the micrometer adjustments.
There were also pictures of the track saw, but if no changes to micro adjust that should be done would be an issue.
5. Festoolers are now frustrated by a bad choice and possible misinformation from Festool's rep.
I don't like the change either, but Tyler should be given the time to get the right answers, even if that takes time so no misinformation is given.
At least two FOG'ers blame other FOG'ers for Festool's rep botching the information roll out and saying he is doing his job when really we are confused due to his statements. If Festool's rep didn't know what Festool is actually doing, then perhaps he should have waited until he understood what Festool was doing. I don't see why we should be blamed for reacting to information then having the information changed on us and then rereacting.
I agree this could have and should have been handled better, for example, after it was announced, a senior member of management or engineering should have chimed in to provide the right answers. I would guess management went to Tyler and said please announce on the FOG not grasping that the forum would react they way it did.