HowardH said:
mini brake would be totally unnecessary. I have been using my TS55 for coming up on ten years without even a sniff of a chance to get hurt. If someone did, they were doing something outside of it's operational intent and it would be Darwinism at work.
This is exactly what many tablesaw owners say about the SawStop: totally unnecessary. We all know saws, including circular saws, cause injuries. I would keep an open mind about TTS buying SawStop and expanding SS.
There are many ways they can expand (of course, no one knows what TTS had in mind when it decided to buy out SS, but I believe it was a well-thought out financial or strategic decision). They can expand the sales and market of SS alone. Or, they can also expand the SS technology to other tools under the Festool brand name. Or, they can expand the SS technology to other non-Festool brands.
Knowing that the SS patents will eventually expire (in 5 years? So far no one has the official answer to that question. TTS should know it now, of course), TTS must have something up in the sleeve before it wanted to put down the money. Could it be aiming at something else that SS owns and that something is not known publicly yet? SS R&D dept. has been around for a decade and it could surprise us with things we don't know.
Things should be clearer in 2018, and if I were to prioritize, I would like to have my Kapex equipped with the SS feature, then the bandsaw. Drill press? Nah. Since I don't use a jointer anymore, or it would be the third machine I wanted the SS technology. Tablesaw? Mine is already a SawStop.
Before we rule out anything, such as a SS cannot be done on (fill-in-the-name-of=the-tool, because it is too small, too big, too fast, too slow, too expensive, too cheap...) (who would have thought 20 years ago that a tablesaw blade could be stopped in time in a hobby shop?), we should take note of this quote “For an idea that does not first seem insane, there is no hope.”
This insane quote is by Albert Einstein, if you want to know.