JimH2 said:
The abatement is a nice way to on all existing businesses and taxpayers who have to absorb the difference.
I don’t really love commercial tax abatements, but in this case, I’m not sure the abatement is really costing the Lebanon any money.
“Whitehead said, based on conservative estimates, that the investment will annually add $450,000 to the property tax levy, $6,000 to the personal property tax levy and $140,000 in income tax levy, estimating that about 20 percent of new employees will be county residents.
In return for the company’s investment in the city, the council approved a six-year non-traditional real property abatement that is projected to save the company $390,000 over the life of the abatement.”
Judging from this quote, the potential extra property taxes per year on the expansion are $450,000. The real estate abatement is for six years, and is estimated to save Festool $390,000 over yhe lifetime of the abatement. $390,000 divided by 6 is $65,000 , so the real estate abatement is about a 15% discount per year for just six years. I doubt the abatement is actually costing Lebanon or its residents any money, even if some extra infrastructure costs such as storm runoff, sewer improvements, or road work, has to be done for the expansion. At worst the costs would probably be revenue neutral, and I would still guess it would be revenue positive for Lebanon, given the amount of the additional property taxes. The abatement just gives Festool a bit of a tax break while they get the expansion up and running.